Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 536-542

  Sigmundsson, Freyr G ^a   Kang, Xiao P ^a   Jönsson, Bo ^a   Strömqvist, Björn ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE DURATION; DRUG USE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYMPTOM; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTRIES; SPINAL STENOSIS;

EID: 84867849979     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733915     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aalto T J, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L et al. Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2006; 31: E648 -E663.
2. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suomlainen O. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1997; 22 (19): 2278-82.
3. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal H J, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleås F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative or surgical management ? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 2000; 25 (11): 1424-36.
4. Aliashkevich A F, Kristof R A, Schramm J, Brechtelsbaner D. Does additional discectomy and the degree of dural sac compression influence the outcome of decompressive surgery for spinal stenosis ? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141: 1273-80.
5. Athiviraham A, Wali Z A, Yen D. Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of spinal stenosis. Spine J 2011; 11: 613-7.
6. Barz T, Melloh M, Staub L P, Lord S J, Lange J, Röder C P et al. Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2010; 35 (8): 892-7.
7. Bederman S S, Coyte P C, Kreder H J, Mahomed N N, McIsaac W J, Wright J G. Who's in the driver's seat? The influence of patient and physician enthusiasm on regional variation in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery: A population-based study. Spine 2011; 36 (6): 481-9.
8. Boden S D, Davis D O, Dina T S, Patronas N J, Wiesel S W. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72: 403-8.
9. Chao T, Pham K, Steward O, Gupta R. Chronic nerve compression injury induces a phenotypic switch of neurons within the dorsal root ganglia. J Comp Neurol 2008; 506 (2): 180-93.
10. Gupta R, Rowshan K, Chao T, Mozaffar T, Steward O. Chronic nerve compression induces local demyelination and remyelination in a rat model of carpal tunnel syndrome. Exp Neurol 2004; 187 (2): 500-8.
11. Haig A J, Geisser M E, Tong H C, Yamakawa K S, Quint D J, Hoff J T, et al. Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar spinal stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89 (2): 358-66.
12. Hara N, Oka H, Yamazaki T, Takeshita K, Murakami M, Hoshi K, et al. Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (11): 1849-54.
13. Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Miettinen H. The predictive value of preoperative myelography in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1994; 19: 1335-8.
14. Jansson K A, Nemeth G, Granath F, Jönsson B, Blomqvist P. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91: 210-6.
15. Johnsson K E, Rosen I, Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 1992; (279): 82-6.
16. Jönsson B, Annertz M, Sjöberg C, Strömqvist B. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by and independent observer. Spine 1997; 22 (24): 2938-44.
17. Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, Kusakabe T, et al. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 2012; 37 (3): 207-13.
18. Katz J N, Lipson S J, Brick G W, Grobler L J, Weinstein J N, Fossel A H, et al. Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1995; 10: 1155- 60.
19. Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis ? A randomized controlled trail. Spine 2007; 32: 1-8.
20. Meyerding H W. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1932; 54: 371-7.
21. Ng L C, Tafazal S, Sell P. The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 199-206.
22. Ogikubo O, Forsberg L, Hansson T. The relationship between the crosssectional area of the cauda equina and preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2008; 32 (13): 1423-8.
23. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, Bagge U. Effects of experimental graded compression on blood flow in spinal nerve roots. A vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res 1989; 7 (6): 817-23.
24. Radkliff K, Rihn J, Hilibrand A, DiIoro T, Tosteson T, Lurie J, et al. Does duration of symptoms in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis affect outcomes? Analysis of the Spine Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 2011. E-pub ahead of print\
25. Sandén B, Försth P, Michaëlsson K. Smokers show less improvement than nonsmokers two years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A study of 4555 patients from the Swedish spine register. Spine 2011; 36: 1059-64.
26. Sigmundsson F G, Kang X P, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis. A prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (2): 204-10.
27. Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Lehto S M, Kröger H, Viinamäki H. Depression is associated with a poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: A two-year prospective follow-up study. Spine 2011; 36: 677-82.
28. Sirvanci M, Bhatia M, Ganiyusufoglu K A, Duran C, Tezer M, Ozturk C, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 679-85.
29. Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B. The Swedish Spine Register: development, design and utility. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: S294-S304.
30. Turner J A, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the litterature. Spine 1992; 17 (1): 1-8.
31. Weinstein J N, Lurie J D, Olson P, Bronner K K, Fisher E S, Morgan T S. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine 2006; 31 (23): 2707-14.
32. Weinstein J N, Tosteson T D, Lurie J D, Tosteson A N, Blood E, Hanscom B, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 794-810.
33. Yukawa Y, Lenke L G, Tenhula J, Bridwell K H, Riew K D, Blanke K, et al. A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84; 1954-9.
34. Zeifang F, Schiltenwolf M, Abel R, Morandi B. Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008; 9: 89.