Analysis of the relationship between manufacturing strategy, practices and operational performance;Análise das relações entre estratégia de produção, práticas e desempenho operacional

Producao

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 502-516

  da Silva, Eliciane Maria ^a   Santos, Fernando César Almada ^b   de Castro, Mário ^b  

^a METHODIST UNIVERSITY OF PIRACICABA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Best practices; Furniture sector; Manufacturing strategy; Operational performance; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867838763     PISSN: 01036513     EISSN: 19805411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-65132012005000009     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. ADAM, E. E.; SWAMIDASS, P. M. Assessing operations management from strategic perspective. Journal of Management, v. 15, n. 2, p. 181-203, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500204
2. ANGELL, L. C.; KLASSEN, R. D. Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, v. 17, n. 5, p. 575-598, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00006-6
3. BEAMON, B. M. Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 3-4, p. 275-292, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714
4. BEAUMONT, N. Best practice in Australian manufacturing sites. Technovation, v. 25, n. 11, p. 1291-1297, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.09.004
5. BOLLEN, K. A. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
6. BOSELIE, P.; PAAUWE, J.; JANSEN, P. Human resource management and performance: lessons from the Netherlands. International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 12, n. 7, p. 1107-1125, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190110068331
7. BOYER, K. K. Longitudinal linkages between intended and realized operations strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 18, n. 4, p. 356-373, 1998. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/01443579810199739
8. CAMP, R. C. Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press, 1999.
9. CENTRO GESTOR DE INOVAÇÃO MOVELEIRO - AGIM. Cenário Moveleiro. Disponível em:. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2007.
10. CUA, K. O.; McKONE, K. E.; SCHROEDER, R. G. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, v. 19, n. 6, p. 675-694, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00066-3
11. DAVIES, A. J.; KOCHHAR, A. K. A framework for the selection of best practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 20, n. 10, p. 1203-1217, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343744
12. DAVIES, A. J.; KOCHHAR, A. K. Manufacturing best practice and performance studies: a critique. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 22, n. 3, p. 289-305, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417597
13. DÍAZ, M. S.; GIL, M. J. A.; MACHUCA, J. A. D. Performance measurement systems, competitive priorities, and advanced manufacturing technology Some evidence from the aeronautical sector. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25, n. 8, p. 781-799, 2005. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/01443570510608600
14. FINE, C. H.; HAX, A. C. Manufacturing strategy: a methodology and an illustration. Interfaces, v. 15, n. 6, p. 28-46, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.15.6.28
15. FLYNN, B. B. et al. World-class manufacturing project: overview and selected results. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 17, n. 7, p. 671-685, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579710175592
16. FORTUIN, L. Performance indicators: why, where and how? European Journal of Operational Research, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1-9, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90449-3
17. FOWLER, F. J. Survey research methods. Newbury: Sage, 2002.
18. FREITAS, H. et al. O método de pesquisa survey. RAUSPRevista de Administração, v. 35, n. 3, p. 105-112, 2000.
19. FYNES, B.; VOSS, A. C.; BÚRCA, S. The Impact Of Supply chain relationship dynamics on manufacturing performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 6-19, 2005. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/01443570510572213
20. GARVIN, D. A. Managing quality: the strategic and competitive edge. New York: The Free Press, 1988.
21. GARVIN, D. A. Manufacturing strategic planning. California Management Review, v. 35, n. 4, p. 85-106, 1993.
22. GERWIN, D. A Agenda for research on the flexibility of manufacturing processes. International Journal & Production Management, v. 7, n. 1, p. 38-49, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb054784
23. GILLEY, M. K.; RASHEED, A. Making more by doing less: an analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management, v. 26, n. 4, p. 763-790, 2000.
24. HAIR JUNIOR, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2005a.
25. HAIR JUNOIR, J. F. et al. Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005b.
26. HATCHER, L. A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Carey: SAS Institute, 1994.
27. HAYES, R. H. et al. Operations, Strategy and Technology, Pursuing the Competitive Edge. New York: John Willey & Sons, 2004.
28. HAYES, R. H.; WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. Restoring our competitive edge: competing through manufacturing. New York: John e Wiley, 1984.
29. HILL, T. Manufacturing strategy: text and cases. Richard D. Irwin, 1993.
30. HÖRTE, S. A.; LINDBERG, L.; TUNÄLV, C. Manufacturing strategies in Sweden. International Journal of Production Research, v. 25, n. 11, p. 1573-1586, 1987.
31. INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS E MARKETING INDUSTRIAL - IEMI. Relatório Setorial da Indústria de Móveis no Brasil. São Paulo: IEMI, 2006. v. 1.
32. KAPLAN, D. Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 2000.
33. KETOKIVI, M.; SCHROEDER, R. G. Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: a routine-based view. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 24, n. 2, p. 171-191, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570410514876
34. KLINE, R. B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford, 2005.
35. KOTHA, S.; SWAMIDASS, P. M. Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, v. 18, n. 3, p. 257-277, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00025-X
36. LAUGEN, T. B.; BOER, N. A. H.; FRICK, J. Best manufacturing practices: what do the best performing companies do? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 131-150, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570510577001
37. LEONG, G. K.; SNYDER, D. L.; WARD, P. Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, v. 18, n. 2, p. 109-122, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(90)90058-H
38. LI, S. et al. Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices. Journal of Operations Management, v. 23, n. 6, p. 618-641, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.01.002
39. LI, S. et al. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, v. 34, n. 2, p. 107-124, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.002
40. MILLER, J. G.; ROTH, A. V. A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science, v. 40, n. 3, p. 285-304, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.3.285
41. MILLS, J.; PLATTS, K.; GREGORY, M. A framework for the design of manufacturing strategy process: a contingency approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 15, n. 4, p. 17-49, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083596
42. NARASIMHAN, R.; SWINK, M.; KIM, S. W. An exploratory study of manufacturing practiceand performance interrelationships: implications for capability progression. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25, n. 10, p. 1013-1033, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570510619509
43. PAIVA, E. L.; CARVALHO JUNIOR; J. M.; FENSTERSEIFER, J. E. Estratégia de produção e de operações: conceitos, melhores práticas e visão de futuro. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2004.
44. PINSONNEAULT, A.; KRAEMER, K. L. An assessment of the use of survey research in the management information systems (MIS) field between 1980 and 1990. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 10, n. 2, p. 75-106, 1993.
45. PIRES, S. R. I. Gestão estratégica da produção. Piracicaba: Unimep, 1995.
46. PUJARI, D. Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, v. 26, n. 1, p. 76-85, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006
47. SCHMENNER, R. W. Production/operations management, concepts and situations. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1981.
48. SCHROEDER, R. G. Operations management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
49. SCHROEDER, R. G.; BATES, K. A.; JUNTTILA, M. A. A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 2, p. 105-117, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.213
50. SEBRAE. Critérios para definição do porte das empresas. Sebrae, 2008. Disponível em: .
51. SILA, I. Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: an empirical study. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 83-109, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.003
52. SILA, I.; EBRAHIMPOUR, M. Critical linkages among TQM factors and business results. International Journal & Production Management, v. 25, n. 11, p. 1123-1155, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570510626925
53. SILVA, E. M. et al. Análise da relação entre a dimensão ambiental e as prioridades competitivas tradicionais de produção: um estudo em empresas com certificação ISO 14001. In: ANNUAL MEETING DA ANPAD - ENANPAD, 32., 2008. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, 2008.
54. SKINNER, W. Manufacturing: the missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, v. 47, n. 3, p. 136-145, 1969.
55. SKINNER, W. Manufacturing in the corporate strategy. New York: Wiley, 1978.
56. SOUSA, R.; VOSS, A. C. Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Business and Management, v. 26, n. 6, p. 697-713, 2008.
57. STONENRAKER, P. W.; LEONG, G. K. Operations strategy. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, 1994.
58. SWAMIDASS, P. M.; NEWELL, W. T. Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model. Management Science, v. 33, n. 4, p. 509-524, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.4.509
59. SWINK, M.; NARASIMHAN, R.; WANG, C. Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 148-164, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.006
60. SYNODINOS, N. E. The "art" of questionnaire construction: some important considerations for manufacturing studies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, v. 14, n. 3, p. 221-237, 2003. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/09576060310463172
61. UNGAN, M. Management support for the adoption of manufacturing best practices: key factors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 43, n. 18, p. 3803-3820, 2005.
62. VACHON, S.; KLASSEN, R. D. Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of the package printing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 6-7, p. 661-671, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2005.07.014
63. VICKERY, S. K.; DROGE, C.; MARKLAND, R. E. Dimensions of manufacturing: strength in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management, v. 15, n. 4, p. 317-330, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00012-0
64. VOSS, A. C. Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 15, n. 4, p. 5-16, 1995. http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/01443579510083587
65. WARD, P. T.; McCREERY, J. K.; RITZMAN, L. P. Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1035-1046, 1998. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb00886.x
66. WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. Manufacturing strategy: defining the missing link. Strategic Management Journal, v. 5, n. 1, p. 77-91, 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050106
67. WOMACK, J. P.; JONES, D. R.; ROOS, D. The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates, 1990.
68. YOUNDT, M. A. et al. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, v. 39, n. 4, p. 836-866, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256714