Development of a methodology for in situ assessment of topsoil dry bulk density

Soil and Tillage Research

Volumn 126, Issue , 2013, Pages 229-237

  Quraishi, Mohammed Z ^a   Mouazen, Abdul M ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bulk density; In situ measurement; Penetration resistance; Soil compaction

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; CORE SAMPLES; FORECASTING; LINEAR REGRESSION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; NEURAL NETWORKS; SOIL MECHANICS; SOILS;

BULK DENSITY; DETERMINATION COEFFICIENTS; IN-SITU MEASUREMENT; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; NON-LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; PENETRATION RESISTANCES; ROOT-MEAN-SQUARE ERROR OF PREDICTIONS; SOIL COMPACTION;

SOIL SURVEYS;

EID: 84867783814     PISSN: 01671987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2012.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adamchuk, V.I., Hummel, J.W., Morgan, M.T., Upadhyaya, S.K., On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 44 (2004), 71–91.
2. Andrade-Sánchez, P., Upadhyaya, S.K., Jenkins, B.M., Development, construction, and field evaluation of a soil compaction profile sensor. Transactions of The American Society of Agriculture and Biological Engineers 50 (2007), 719–725.
3. Aragón, A., García, M.G., Filgueira, R.R., Pachepsky, Y.A., Maximum compactibility of Argentine soils from the Proctor test; the relationship with organic carbon and water content. Soil & Tillage Research 56 (2000), 197–204.
4. Canarache, A., PENETR—a generalized semi-empirical model estimating soil resistance to penetration. Soil & Tillage Research 16 (1990), 51–70.
5. Curtis, R.O., Post, B.W., Estimating bulk density from organic-matter content in some Vermont forest soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal 28 (1964), 285–286.
6. Eijkelkamp, 2009. P1.52-1 Penetrologger. 2010.
7. Franzen, H., Lal, R., Ehlers, W., Tillage and mulching effects on physical properties of a tropical Alfisol. Soil & Tillage Research 28 (1994), 329–346.
8. Günaydin, O., Estimation of soil compaction parameters by using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks. Environmental Geology 57 (2009), 203–215.
9. Hodgson, J.M., Soil Survey Field Handbook: Describing and Sampling Soil Profiles. 1974, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Lawes Agricultural Trust, Harpenden.
10. Horn, R., van den Akker, J.J.H., Arvidsson, J., Subsoil Compaction: Distribution, Processes and Consequences. 2000, Deutsche Bibliothek, Germany.
11. Khalilmoghadam, B., Afyuni, M., Abbaspour, K.C., Jalalian, A., Dehghani, A.A., Schulin, R., Estimation of surface shear strength in Zagros region of Iran – a comparison of artificial neural networks and multiple-linear regression models. Geoderma 153 (2009), 29–36.
12. Kuang, B., Mahmood, H.S., Quraishi, M.Z., Hoogmoed, W.B., Mouazen, A.M., van Henten, E.J., Sensing soil properties in the laboratory, in situ, and on-line: a review. Advances in Agronomy, 2012, Academic Press, UK chapter 4, pp. 155–223.
13. Larson, W.E., Gupta, S.C., Useche, R.A., Compression of agricultural soils from eight soil orders. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44 (1980), 450–457.
14. Miao, Y., Mulla, D.J., Robert, P.C., Identifying important factors influencing corn yield and grain quality variability using artificial neural networks. Precision Agriculture 7 (2006), 117–135.
15. Mouazen, A.M., Ramon, H., Development of on-line measurement system of bulk density based on on-line measured draught, depth and soil moisture content. Soil & Tillage Research 86 (2006), 218–229.
16. Mouazen, A.M., Ramon, H., De Baerdemaeker, J., Modelling compaction from on-line measurement of soil properties and sensor draught. Precision Agriculture 4 (2003), 203–212.
17. Mulqueen, J., Stafford, J.V., Tanner, D.W., Evaluation of penetrometers for measuring soil strength. Journal of Terramechanics 14 (1977), 137–151.
18. Pachepsky, Y.A., Timlin, D., Varallyay, G., Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60 (1996), 727–733.
19. Quraishi, M. Z., Mouazen, A. M., 2010. Laboratory evaluation of the influence of bulk density, moisture content and organic matter content on penetration resistance in a sandy loam soil. Proceedings of the International Conference on AgEng2010, September 6-8, 2010, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
20. Saini, G.R., Organic matter as a measure of bulk density of soil. Nature 210 (1966), 1295–1296.
21. Schafer, R.L., Johnson, C.E., Koolen, A.J., Gupta, S.C., Horn, R., Future research needs in soil compaction. Transactions of The American Society of Agriculture and Biological Engineers 35 (1992), 1761–1770.
22. Sharifi, A., Godwin, R.J., O'Dogherty, M.J., Dresser, M.L., Evaluating the performance of a soil compaction sensor. Soil Use and Management 23 (2007), 171–177.
23. Sinha, S.K., Wang, M.C., Artificial neural network prediction models for soil compaction and permeability. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 26 (2008), 47–64.
24. Soane, B.D., The role of organic matter in soil compactibility. A review of some practical aspects. Soil & Tillage Research 16 (1990), 179–201.
25. Soane, B.D., van Ouwerkerk, C., Implications of soil compaction in crop production for the quality of the environment. Soil & Tillage Research 35 (1995), 5–22.
26. StatSoft, I., 2011. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), 10.
27. Stelluti, M., Maiorana, M., De Giorgio, D., Multivariate approach to evaluate the penetrometer resistance in different tillage systems. Soil & Tillage Research 46 (1998), 145–151.
28. Stock, O., Downes, N.K., Effects of additions of organic matter on the penetration resistance of glacial till for the entire water tension range. Soil & Tillage Research 99 (2008), 191–201.
29. Vaz, C.M.P., Manieri, J.M., de Maria, I.C., Tuller, M., Modeling and correction of soil penetration resistance for varying soil water content. Geoderma 166 (2011), 92–101.
30. Yasin, M., Grisso, R.D., Bashford, L.L., Jones, A.J., Mielke, L.N., Normalizing cone resistance values by covariance analysis. Transactions of The American Society of Agriculture and Biological Engineers 36 (1993), 1267–1270.