Adaptation of surround inhibition in the human motor system

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 222, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 211-217

  Kassavetis, P ^a   Saifee, T A ^a   Sadnicka, A ^a   Parees I ^a   Kojovic, M ^a   Rothwell, J C ^a   Edwards, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Muscle vibration; Surround inhibition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VIBRATION;

EID: 84867748080     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3207-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beck S, Hallett M (2010) Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty. Clin Neurophysiol 121(1):98-103
2. Beck S, Hallett M (2011) Surround inhibition in the motor system. Exp Brain Res 210(2):165-172
3. Beck S, Richardson SP et al (2008) Short intracortical and surround inhibition are selectively reduced during movement initiation in focal hand dystonia. J Neurosci 28(41):10363-10369
4. Brown MC, Enberg I et al (1967a) The use of vibration as a selective repetitive stimulus for Ia afferent fibres. J Physiol 191(1):31P-32P
5. Brown MC, Engberg I et al (1967b) The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat. J Physiol 192(3):773-800
6. Burke D, Hagbarth KE et al (1976) Responses of human musclespindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles. J Physiol Lond 261(3):673-693
7. Cheng PW, Novick LR (1992) Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychol Rev 99:365-382
8. Cheng S, Sabes PN (2007) Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics. J Neurophysiol 97:3057-3069
9. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A et al (2004) The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans. Clin Neurophysiol 115(2):255-266
10. Eldred E, Granit R et al (1953) Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance. J Physiol 122(3):498-523
11. Elliott D, Roy EA (1981) Interlimb transfer after adaptation to visual displacement: patterns predicted from the functional closeness of limb neural control centres. Perception 10:383-389
12. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429-433
13. Fish J, Soechting JF (1992) Synergistic finger movements in a skilled motor task. Exp Brain Res 91(2):327-334
14. Galea JM, Vazquez A et al (2011) Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex 21(8):1761-1770
15. Hadipour-Niktarash A, Lee CK, Desmond JE, Shadmehr R (2007) Impairment of retention but not acquisition of a visuomotor skill through time-dependent disruption of primary motor cortex. J Neurosci 27:13413-13419
16. Harris CS (1965) Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychol Rev 72:419-444
17. Kaneko K, Kawai S et al (1996) The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101(6):478-482
18. Kording KP, Beierholm U et al (2007) Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2(9):e943
19. Marsden CD, Meadows JC et al (1969) Observations on the reflex response to muscle vibration in man and its voluntary control. Brain 92(4):829-846
20. Miall RC, Weir DJ et al (1993) Is the cerebellum a smith predictor. J Mot Behav 25(3):203-216
21. Proske U, Gandevia SC (2009) The kinaesthetic senses. J Physiol 587(Pt 17):4139-4146
22. Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47(2):177-190
23. Roll JP, Vedel JP et al (1989) Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res 76(1):213-222
24. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC (2003) Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans. J Physiol 551(Pt 2):649-660
25. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC (2004) The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 561(Pt 1):307-320
26. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC (2006) Spatial attention affects sensorimotor reorganisation in human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 170(1):97-108
27. Rosenkranz K, Butler K et al (2009) Regaining motor control in musician's dystonia by restoring sensorimotor organization. J Neurosci 29(46):14627-14636
28. Schieber MH (1991) Individuated finger movements of rhesus monkeys: a means of quantifying the independence of the digits. J Neurophysiol 65(6):1381-1391
29. Sohn YH, Hallett M (2004) Surround inhibition in human motor system. Exp Brain Res 158(4):397-404
30. Stefan K, Kunesch E et al (2000) Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 123(Pt 3):572-584
31. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ (2007) Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98:54-62
32. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1996) How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res 111:253-261
33. Wei K, Kording K (2009) Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101(2):655-664
34. Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J et al (2011) Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(12):739-751