A systematic review of definitions and classification systems of adjacent segment pathology

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 22, 2012, Pages

  Kraemer, Paul ^a   Fehlings, Michael G ^b   Hashimoto, Robin ^c   Lee, Michael J ^d   Anderson, Paul A ^e   Chapman, Jens R ^f   Raich, Annie ^c   Norvell, Daniel C ^c  

^a INDIANA SPINE GROUP   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Spectrum Research Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

adjacent segment degeneration; adjacent segment disease; adjacent segment pathology; cervical spine; disc degeneration; junctional stenosis; lumbar spine; revision spine surgery; spinal stenosis; spine surgery

Indexed keywords

ADJACENT SEGMENT PATHOLOGY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY; MYELOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSSIFICATION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE;

EID: 84867746650     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d7dd6     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, et al. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1441-5; discussion 1446-7. (Pubitemid 41760293)
2. Deyo RA, Martin BI, Kreuter W, et al. Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1979-86.
3. Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 443: 139-46. (Pubitemid 44324944)
4. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 2010; 303: 1259-65.
5. Medical News Today. Medicare to gain 7,000 new baby boomers per day in 2011. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/212585.php. Accessed April 27, 2012.
6. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1497-1503. (Pubitemid 38886539)
7. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 519-28. (Pubitemid 29211592)
8. Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Spine J 2011; 11: 11-20.
9. Hilibrand AS, Rand N. Degenerative lumbar stenosis: Diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7: 239-49.
10. Chapman JR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC, et al, eds. Spine Classifications and Severity Measures. Dubendorf, Switzerland: AO Publishing; 2009.
11. Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD. Development of adjacent-level ossifi cation in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 558-63. (Pubitemid 40315006)