Genetics of germ cell development

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 781-794

  Lesch, Bluma J ^a   Page, David C ^a  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA BINDING PROTEIN;

CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GAMETOGENESIS; GENETIC REGULATION; GERM CELL; GERM LINE; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SEX DETERMINATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; MALE; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; OOCYTES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPERMATOCYTES;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84867743258     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg3294     Document Type: Review

References (164)

1. Richardson, B. E. & Lehmann, R. Mechanisms guiding primordial germ cell migration: strategies from different organisms. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 37-49 (2010).
2. Von Stetina, J. R. & Orr-Weaver, T. L. Developmental control of oocyte maturation and egg activation in metazoan models. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a005553 (2011).
3. Yanowitz, J. Meiosis: making a break for it. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 744-751 (2010).
4. Hermo, L., Pelletier, R. M., Cyr, D. G. & Smith, C. E. Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 2: changes in spermatid organelles associated with development of spermatozoa. Microsc. Res. Tech. 73, 279-319 (2010).
5. Extavour, C. G. & Akam, M. Mechanisms of germ cell specification across the metazoans: epigenesis and preformation. Development 130, 5869-5884 (2003).
6. Updike, D. & Strome, S. P granule assembly and function in Caenorhabditis elegans germ cells. J. Androl. 31, 53-60 (2010).
7. Strome, S. & Wood, W. B. Immunofluorescence visualization of germ-line-specific cytoplasmic granules in embryos, larvae, and adults of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1558-1562 (1982).
8. Gallo, C. M., Wang, J. T., Motegi, F. & Seydoux, G. Cytoplasmic partitioning of P granule components is not required to specify the germline in C. elegans. Science 330, 1685-1689 (2010).
9. Illmensee, K. & Mahowald, A. P. Transplantation of posterior polar plasm in Drosophila. Induction of germ cells at the anterior pole of the egg. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 1016-1020 (1974).
10. Lehmann, R. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. Abdominal segmentation, pole cell formation, and embryonic polarity require the localized activity of oskar, a maternal gene in Drosophila. Cell 47, 141-152 (1986).
11. Ephrussi, A. & Lehmann, R. Induction of germ cell formation by oskar. Nature 358, 387-392 (1992).
12. Thomson, T. & Lasko, P. Drosophila tudor is essential for polar granule assembly and pole cell specification, but not for posterior patterning. Genesis 40, 164-170 (2004).
13. Wang, C., Dickinson, L. K. & Lehmann, R. Genetics of nanos localization in Drosophila. Dev. Dyn. 199, 103-115 (1994).
14. Lehmann, R. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. The maternal gene nanos has a central role in posterior pattern formation of the Drosophila embryo. Development 112, 679-691 (1991).
15. Barbee, S. A. & Evans, T. C. The Sm proteins regulate germ cell specification during early C. elegans embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 291, 132-143 (2006).
16. Gonsalvez, G. B., Rajendra, T. K., Wen, Y., Praveen, K. & Matera, A. G. Sm proteins specify germ cell fate by facilitating oskar mRNA localization. Development 137, 2341-2351 (2010).
17. Gonsalvez, G. B., Rajendra, T. K., Tian, L. & Matera, A. G. The Sm-protein methyltransferase, dart5, is essential for germ-cell specification and maintenance. Curr. Biol. 16, 1077-1089 (2006).
18. Ohinata, Y. et al. Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 436, 207-213 (2005).
19. Yamaji, M. et al. Critical function of Prdm14 for the establishment of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature Genet. 40, 1016-1022 (2008).
20. Saitou, M., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature 418, 293-300 (2002).
21. Tanaka, S. S. & Matsui, Y. Developmentally regulated expression of mil-1 and mil-2, mouse interferon-induced transmembrane protein like genes, during formation and differentiation of primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev. 119, S261-S267 (2002).
22. Tam, P. P. & Zhou, S. X. The allocation of epiblast cells to ectodermal and germ-line lineages is influenced by the position of the cells in the gastrulating mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 178, 124-132 (1996).
23. Ohinata, Y. et al. A signaling principle for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Cell 137, 571-584 (2009).
24. de Sousa Lopes, S. M. et al. BMP signaling mediated by ALK2 in the visceral endoderm is necessary for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 18, 1838-1849 (2004).
25. Ying, Y., Liu, X. M., Marble, A., Lawson, K. A. & Zhao, G. Q. Requirement of Bmp8b for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 1053-1063 (2000).
26. Ying, Y. & Zhao, G. Q. Cooperation of endoderm-derived BMP2 and extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 in primordial germ cell generation in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 232, 484-492 (2001).
27. Yamaguchi, S., Kimura, H., Tada, M., Nakatsuji, N. & Tada, T. Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development. Gene Expr. Patterns 5, 639-646 (2005).
28. Yabuta, Y., Kurimoto, K., Ohinata, Y., Seki, Y. & Saitou, M. Gene expression dynamics during germline specification in mice identified by quantitative single-cell gene expression profiling. Biol. Reprod. 75, 705-716 (2006).
29. Rosner, M. H. et al. A POU-domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature 345, 686-692 (1990).
30. Bortvin, A., Goodheart, M., Liao, M. & Page, D. C. Dppa3/Pgc7/stella is a maternal factor and is not required for germ cell specification in mice. BMC Dev. Biol. 4, 2 (2004).
31. West, J. A. et al. A role for Lin28 in primordial germ-cell development and germ-cell malignancy. Nature 460, 909-913 (2009).
32. Okamura, D., Tokitake, Y., Niwa, H. & Matsui, Y. Requirement of Oct3/4 function for germ cell specification. Dev. Biol. 317, 576-584 (2008).
33. Molyneaux, K. A., Stallock, J., Schaible, K. & Wylie, C. Time-lapse analysis of living mouse germ cell migration. Dev. Biol. 240, 488-498 (2001).
34. Jaglarz, M. K. & Howard, K. R. Primordial germ cell migration in Drosophila melanogaster is controlled by somatic tissue. Development 120, 83-89 (1994).
35. Seydoux, G. et al. Repression of gene expression in the embryonic germ lineage of C. elegans. Nature 382, 713-716 (1996).
36. Mello, C. C. et al. The PIE-1 protein and germline specification in C. elegans embryos. Nature 382, 710-712 (1996).
37. Batchelder, C. et al. Transcriptional repression by the Caenorhabditis elegans germ-line protein PIE-1. Genes Dev. 13, 202-212 (1999).
38. Zhang, F., Barboric, M., Blackwell, T. K. & Peterlin, B. M. A model of repression: CTD analogs and PIE-1 inhibit transcriptional elongation by P-TEFb. Genes Dev. 17, 748-758 (2003).
39. Ghosh, D. & Seydoux, G. Inhibition of transcription by the Caenorhabditis elegans germline protein PIE-1: genetic evidence for distinct mechanisms targeting initiation and elongation. Genetics 178, 235-243 (2008).
40. Nakamura, A., Amikura, R., Mukai, M., Kobayashi, S. & Lasko, P. F. Requirement for a noncoding RNA in Drosophila polar granules for germ cell establishment. Science 274, 2075-2079 (1996).
41. Deshpande, G., Calhoun, G. & Schedl, P. Overlapping mechanisms function to establish transcriptional quiescence in the embryonic Drosophila germline. Development 131, 1247-1257 (2004).
42. Martinho, R. G., Kunwar, P. S., Casanova, J. & Lehmann, R. A noncoding RNA is required for the repression of RNApolII-dependent transcription in primordial germ cells. Curr. Biol. 14, 159-165 (2004).
43. Hanyu-Nakamura, K., Sonobe-Nojima, H., Tanigawa, A., Lasko, P. & Nakamura, A. Drosophila Pgc protein inhibits P-TEFb recruitment to chromatin in primordial germ cells. Nature 451, 730-733 (2008).
44. Seki, Y. et al. Cellular dynamics associated with the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in migrating primordial germ cells in mice. Development 134, 2627-2638 (2007).
45. Schaner, C. E., Deshpande, G., Schedl, P. D. & Kelly, W. G. A conserved chromatin architecture marks and maintains the restricted germ cell lineage in worms and flies. Dev. Cell. 5, 747-757 (2003).
46. Bender, L. B., Cao, R., Zhang, Y. & Strome, S. The MES-2/MES-3/MES-6 complex and regulation of histone H3 methylation in C. elegans. Curr. Biol.14, 1639-1643 (2004).
47. Korf, I., Fan, Y. & Strome, S. The Polycomb group in Caenorhabditis elegans and maternal control of germline development. Development 125, 2469-2478 (1998).
48. Holdeman, R., Nehrt, S. & Strome, S. MES-2, a maternal protein essential for viability of the germline in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to a Drosophila Polycomb group protein. Development 125, 2457-2467 (1998).
49. Katz, D. J., Edwards, T. M., Reinke, V. & Kelly, W. G. A. C. elegans LSD1 demethylase contributes to germline immortality by reprogramming epigenetic memory. Cell 137, 308-320 (2009).
50. Rudolph, T. et al. Heterochromatin formation in Drosophila is initiated through active removal of H3K4 methylation by the LSD1 homolog SU(VAR)3-3. Mol. Cell. 26, 103-115 (2007).
51. Kurimoto, K. et al. Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by Blimp1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Genes Dev. 22, 1617-1635 (2008).
52. Ancelin, K. et al. Blimp1 associates with Prmt5 and directs histone arginine methylation in mouse germ cells. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 623-630 (2006).
53. Hirsh, D., Oppenheim, D. & Klass, M. Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 49, 200-219 (1976).
54. Austin, J. & Kimble, J. glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 51, 589-599 (1987).
55. Henderson, S. T. Gao, D., Lambie, E. J. & Kimble, J. lag-2 may encode a signaling ligand for the GLP-1 and LIN-12 receptors of C. elegans. Development 120, 2913-2924 (1994).
56. Berry, L. W., Westlund, B. & Schedl, T. Germ-line tumor formation caused by activation of glp-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans member of the Notch family of receptors. Development 124, 925-936 (1997).
57. Crittenden, S. L. et al. A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 417, 660-663 (2002).
58. Eckmann, C. R., Crittenden, S. L., Suh, N. & Kimble, J. GLD-3 and control of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 168, 147-160 (2004).
59. Hansen, D., Wilson-Berry, L., Dang, T. & Schedl, T. Control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the C. elegans germline through regulation of GLD-1 protein accumulation. Development 131, 93-104 (2004).
60. Eckmann, C. R., Kraemer, B., Wickens, M. & Kimble, J. GLD-3, a bicaudal-C homolog that inhibits FBF to control germline sex determination in C. elegans. Dev. Cell. 3, 697-710 (2002).
61. Kraemer, B. et al. NANOS-3 and FBF proteins physically interact to control the sperm-oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 9, 1009-1018 (1999).
62. Ellis, R. E. Sex determination in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 83, 41-64 (2008).
63. Kimble, J. & Crittenden, S. L. Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 405-433 (2007).
64. Chen, P. J., Singal, A., Kimble, J. & Ellis, R. E. A novel member of the tob family of proteins controls sexual fate in Caenorhabditis elegans germ cells. Dev. Biol. 217, 77-90 (2000).
65. Chen, P. & Ellis, R. E. TRA-1A regulates transcription of fog-3, which controls germ cell fate in C. elegans. Development 127, 3119-3129 (2000).
66. Barton, M. K. & Kimble, J. fog-1, a regulatory gene required for specification of spermatogenesis in the germ line of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 125, 29-39 (1990).
67. Ellis, R. E. & Kimble, J. The fog-3 gene and regulation of cell fate in the germ line of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139, 561-577 (1995).
68. Thompson, B. E. et al. Dose-dependent control of proliferation and sperm specification by FOG-1/CPEB. Development 132, 3471-3481 (2005).
69. Hodgkin, J. Sex determination in the nematode C. elegans: analysis of tra-3 suppressors and characterization of fem genes. Genetics 114, 15-52 (1986).
70. Starostina, N. G. et al. A CUL-2 ubiquitin ligase containing three FEM proteins degrades TRA-1 to regulate C. elegans sex determination. Dev. Cell. 13, 127-139 (2007).
71. Otori, M., Karashima, T. & Yamamoto, M. The Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of deleted in azoospermia is involved in the sperm/oocyte switch. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17, 3147-3155 (2006).
72. Zhang, B. et al. A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line. Nature 390, 477-484 (1997).
73. Williamson, A. & Lehmann, R. Germ cell development in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 365-391 (1996).
74. Su, T. T., Campbell, S. D. & O'Farrell, P. H. The cell cycle program in germ cells of the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 196, 160-170 (1998).
75. Zalokar, M. Autoradiographic study of protein and RNA formation during early development of Drosophila eggs. Dev. Biol. 49, 425-437 (1976).
76. Hashiyama, K., Hayashi, Y. & Kobayashi, S. Drosophila Sex lethal gene initiates female development in germline progenitors. Science 333, 885-888 (2011).
77. Casper, A. L. & Van Doren, M. The establishment of sexual identity in the Drosophila germline. Development 136, 3821-3830 (2009).
78. Pauli, D., Oliver, B. & Mahowald, A. P. The role of the ovarian tumor locus in Drosophila melanogaster germ line sex determination. Development 119, 123-134 (1993).
79. Lu, J. & Oliver, B. Drosophila OVO regulates ovarian tumor transcription by binding unusually near the transcription start site. Development 128, 1671-1686 (2001).
80. Wawersik, M. et al. Somatic control of germline sexual development is mediated by the JAK/STAT pathway. Nature 436, 563-567 (2005).
81. King, F. J. & Lin, H. Somatic signaling mediated by fs(1)Yb is essential for germline stem cell maintenance during Drosophila oogenesis. Development 126, 1833-1844 (1999).
82. Demerec, M. Biology of Drosophila, (John Wiley & Sons, 1950).
83. Wang, Z. & Lin, H. Nanos maintains germline stem cell self-renewal by preventing differentiation. Science 303, 2016-2019 (2004).
84. Gilboa, L. & Lehmann, R. Repression of primordial germ cell differentiation parallels germ line stem cell maintenance. Curr. Biol. 14, 981-986 (2004).
85. Xie, T. & Spradling, A. C. decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Cell 94, 251-260 (1998).
86. Song, X. et al. Bmp signals from niche cells directly repress transcription of a differentiation-promoting gene, bag of marbles, in germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development 131, 1353-1364 (2004).
87. Kiger, A. A., Jones, D. L., Schulz, C., Rogers, M. B. & Fuller, M. T. Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue. Science 294, 2542-2545 (2001).
88. Lavoie, C. A., Ohlstein, B. & McKearin, D. M. Localization and function of Bam protein require the benign gonial cell neoplasm gene product. Dev. Biol. 212, 405-413 (1999).
89. Gonczy, P., Matunis, E. & DiNardo, S. bag-of-marbles and benign gonial cell neoplasm act in the germline to restrict proliferation during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development 124, 4361-4371 (1997).
90. Li, Y., Minor, N. T., Park, J. K., McKearin, D. M. & Maines, J. Z. Bam and Bgcn antagonize Nanos-dependent germ-line stem cell maintenance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9304-9309 (2009).
91. Bastock, R. & St Johnston, D. Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Biol. 18, R1082-R1087 (2008).
92. Fuller, M. T. Genetic control of cell proliferation and differentiation in Drosophila spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 433-444 (1998).
93. Huynh, J. R. & St Johnston, D. The role of BicD, Egl, Orb and the microtubules in the restriction of meiosis to the Drosophila oocyte. Development 127, 2785-2794 (2000).
94. Tam, P. P. & Snow, M. H. Proliferation and migration of primordial germ cells during compensatory growth in mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 64, 133-147 (1981).
95. Hajkova, P. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev. 117, 15-23 (2002).
96. Tanaka, S. S. et al. The mouse homolog of Drosophila Vasa is required for the development of male germ cells. Genes Dev. 14, 841-853 (2000).
97. Seligman, J. & Page, D. C. The Dazh gene is expressed in male and female embryonic gonads before germ cell sex differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 245, 878-882 (1998).
98. Enders, G. C. & May, J. J. Developmentally regulated expression of a mouse germ cell nuclear antigen examined from embryonic day 11 to adult in male and female mice. Dev. Biol. 163, 331-340 (1994).
99. Gill, M. E., Hu, Y. C., Lin, Y. & Page, D. C. Licensing of gametogenesis, dependent on RNA binding protein DAZL, as a gateway to sexual differentiation of fetal germ cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7443-7448 (2011).
100. Lin, Y., Gill, M. E., Koubova, J. & Page, D. C. Germ cell-intrinsic and-extrinsic factors govern meiotic initiation in mouse embryos. Science 322, 1685-1687 (2008).
101. Hilscher, B. et al. Kinetics of gametogenesis. I. Comparative histological and autoradiographic studies of oocytes and transitional prospermatogonia during oogenesis and prespermatogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 154, 443-470 (1974).
102. Baltus, A. E. et al. In germ cells of mouse embryonic ovaries, the decision to enter meiosis precedes premeiotic DNA replication. Nature Genet. 38, 1430-1434 (2006).
103. Anderson, E. L. et al. Stra8 and its inducer, retinoic acid, regulate meiotic initiation in both spermatogenesis and oogenesis in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14976-14980 (2008).
104. Menke, D. B., Koubova, J. & Page, D. C. Sexual differentiation of germ cells in XX mouse gonads occurs in an anterior-to-posterior wave. Dev. Biol. 262, 303-312 (2003).
105. Koubova, J. et al. Retinoic acid regulates sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2474-2479 (2006).
106. Bowles, J. et al. Retinoid signaling determines germ cell fate in mice. Science 312, 596-600 (2006).
107. Tsuda, M. et al. Conserved role of nanos proteins in germ cell development. Science 301, 1239-1241 (2003).
108. Suzuki, A. & Saga, Y. Nanos2 suppresses meiosis and promotes male germ cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 22, 430-435 (2008).
109. Jameson, S. A. et al. Temporal transcriptional profiling of somatic and germ cells reveals biased lineage priming of sexual fate in the fetal mouse gonad. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002575 (2012).
110. + RNA in mouse oocytes. Dev. Biol. 98, 400-408 (1983).
111. L'Hernault, S. W. Spermatogenesis. in WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology (2006).
112. Wolf, N., Hirsh, D. & McIntosh, J. R. Spermatogenesis in males of the free-living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 63, 155-169 (1978).
113. Ooi, S. L., Priess, J. R. & Henikoff, S. Histone H3.3 variant dynamics in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2, e97 (2006).
114. Miller, M. A. et al. A sperm cytoskeletal protein that signals oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation. Science 291, 2144-2147 (2001).
115. Arico, J. K., Katz, D. J., van der Vlag, J. & Kelly, W. G. Epigenetic patterns maintained in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos can be established by gene activity in the parental germ cells. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001391 (2011).
116. Karashima, T., Sugimoto, A. & Yamamoto, M. Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of the human azoospermia factor DAZ is required for oogenesis but not for spermatogenesis. Development 127, 1069-1079 (2000).
117. Francis, R., Maine, E. & Schedl, T. Analysis of the multiple roles of gld-1 in germline development: interactions with the sex determination cascade and the glp-1 signaling pathway. Genetics 139, 607-630 (1995).
118. McNally, K. L. & McNally, F. J. Fertilization initiates the transition from anaphase I to metaphase II during female meiosis in C. elegans. Dev. Biol. 282, 218-230 (2005).
119. Goldstein, B. & Hird, S. N. Specification of the anteroposterior axis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 122, 1467-1474 (1996).
120. Eberhart, C. G., Maines, J. Z. & Wasserman, S. A. Meiotic cell cycle requirement for a fly homologue of human Deleted in Azoospermia. Nature 381, 783-785 (1996).
121. Gonzalez-Reyes, A., Elliott, H. & St Johnston, D. Polarization of both major body axes in Drosophila by gurken-torpedo signalling. Nature 375, 654-658 (1995).
122. Bonnefoy, E., Orsi, G. A., Couble, P. & Loppin, B. The essential role of Drosophila HIRA for de novo assembly of paternal chromatin at fertilization. PLoS Genet. 3, 1991-2006 (2007).
123. Adenot, P. G., Mercier, Y., Renard, J. P. & Thompson, E. M. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development 124, 4615-4625 (1997).
124. Tsukamoto, S. et al. Autophagy is essential for preimplantation development of mouse embryos. Science 321, 117-120 (2008).
125. Roest, H. P. et al. The ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme HR6A is a maternal factor essential for early embryonic development in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5485-5495 (2004).
126. Lasko, P. Posttranscriptional regulation in Drosophila oocytes and early embryos. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2, 408-416 (2011).
127. Kershner, A. M. & Kimble, J. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA targets for Caenorhabditis elegans FBF, a conserved stem cell regulator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3936-3941 (2010).
128. Qiu, C. et al. Divergence of Pumilio/fem-3 mRNA binding factor (PUF) protein specificity through variations in an RNA-binding pocket. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 6949-6957 (2012).
129. Saxe, J. P. & Lin, H. Small noncoding RNAs in the germline. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a002717 (2011).
130. Banaszynski, L. A., Allis, C. D. & Lewis, P. W. Histone variants in metazoan development. Dev. Cell. 19, 662-674 (2010).
131. Hardy, R. W., Tokuyasu, K. T., Lindsley, D. L. & Garavito, M. The germinal proliferation center in the testis of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 69, 180-190 (1979).
132. Kimble, J. E. & White, J. G. On the control of germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 81, 208-219 (1981).
133. Yoshida, S., Sukeno, M. & Nabeshima, Y. A vasculature-associated niche for undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mouse testis. Science 317, 1722-1726 (2007).
134. Labosky, P. A., Barlow, D. P. & Hogan, B. L. Mouse embryonic germ (EG) cell lines: transmission through the germline and differences in the methylation imprint of insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r) gene compared with embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Development 120, 3197-3204 (1994).
135. Damjanov, I. The road from teratocarcinoma to human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 1, 273-276 (2005).
136. Nayernia, K. et al. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cells give rise to male gametes that can generate offspring mice. Dev. Cell. 11, 125-132 (2006).
137. Hubner, K. et al. Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 300, 1251-1256 (2003).
138. Hayashi, K., Ohta, H., Kurimoto, K., Aramaki, S. & Saitou, M. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 146, 519-532 (2011).
139. Geijsen, N. et al. Derivation of embryonic germ cells and male gametes from embryonic stem cells. Nature 427, 148-154 (2004).
140. Greer, E. L. et al. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 479, 365-371 (2011).
141. Seong, K. H., Li, D., Shimizu, H., Nakamura, R. & Ishii, S. Inheritance of stress-induced, ATF-2-dependent epigenetic change. Cell 145, 1049-1061 (2011).
142. Carone, B. R. et al. Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals. Cell 143, 1084-1096 (2010).
143. Ng, S. F. et al. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs β-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature 467, 963-966 (2010).
144. Kaati, G., Bygren, L. O. & Edvinsson, S. Cardiovascular and diabetes mortality determined by nutrition during parents' and grandparents' slow growth period. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 10, 682-688 (2002).
145. Pembrey, M. E. et al. Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 159-166 (2006).
146. Rassoulzadegan, M. et al. RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse. Nature 441, 469-474 (2006).
147. de Rooij, D. G. Spermatogonial stem cell renewal in the mouse. I. Normal situation. Cell Tissue Kinet. 6, 281-287 (1973).
148. Oakberg, E. F. Spermatogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse. Anat. Rec. 169, 515-531 (1971).
149. Zheng, K., Wu, X., Kaestner, K. H. & Wang, P. J. The pluripotency factor LIN28 marks undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse. BMC Dev. Biol. 9, 38 (2009).
150. Nakagawa, T., Nabeshima, Y. & Yoshida, S. Functional identification of the actual and potential stem cell compartments in mouse spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell. 12, 195-206 (2007).
151. Lok, D. & de Rooij, D. G. Spermatogonial multiplication in the Chinese hamster. III. Labelling indices of undifferentiated spermatogonia throughout the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Cell Tissue Kinet. 16, 31-40 (1983).
152. Nakagawa, T., Sharma, M., Nabeshima, Y., Braun, R. E. & Yoshida, S. Functional hierarchy and reversibility within the murine spermatogenic stem cell compartment. Science 328, 62-67 (2010).
153. Oatley, M. J., Kaucher, A. V., Racicot, K. E. & Oatley, J. M. Inhibitor of DNA binding 4 is expressed selectively by single spermatogonia in the male germline and regulates the self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells in mice. Biol. Reprod. 85, 347-356 (2011).
154. Matson, C. K. et al. The mammalian doublesex homolog DMRT1 is a transcriptional gatekeeper that controls the mitosis versus meiosis decision in male germ cells. Dev. Cell. 19, 612-624 (2010).
155. Ballow, D., Meistrich, M. L., Matzuk, M. & Rajkovic, A. Sohlh1 is essential for spermatogonial differentiation. Dev. Biol. 294, 161-167 (2006).
156. Pangas, S. A. et al. Oogenesis requires germ cell-specific transcriptional regulators Sohlh1 and Lhx8. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8090-8095 (2006).
157. Toyoda, S. et al. Sohlh2 affects differentiation of KIT positive oocytes and spermatogonia. Dev. Biol. 325, 238-248 (2009).
158. Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S. et al. MVH in piRNA processing and gene silencing of retrotransposons. Genes Dev. 24, 887-892 (2010).
159. Crittenden, S. L. et al. Regulation of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 1359-1362 (2003).
160. Sonoda, J. & Wharton, R. P. Recruitment of Nanos to hunchback mRNA by Pumilio. Genes Dev. 13, 2704-2712 (1999).
161. Kim, J. Y., Lee, Y. C. & Kim, C. Direct inhibition of Pumilo activity by Bam and Bgcn in Drosophila germ line stem cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 4741-4746 (2010).
162. Xu, E. Y., Chang, R., Salmon, N. A. & Reijo Pera, R. A. A gene trap mutation of a murine homolog of the Drosophila stem cell factor Pumilio results in smaller testes but does not affect litter size or fertility. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 912-921 (2007).
163. Chen, J. et al. Genome-wide analysis of translation reveals a critical role for deleted in azoospermia-like (Dazl) at the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Genes Dev. 25, 755-766 (2011).
164. Chuma, S. et al. Mouse Tudor Repeat-1 (MTR-1) is a novel component of chromatoid bodies/nuages in male germ cells and forms a complex with snRNPs. Mech. Dev. 120, 979-990 (2003).