Science and technology output indicators in the islamic republic of iran: A case study on the relevance between patents and scientific products of iranian inventors

Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1033-1052

  Arani, Mohamad Alaee ^a   Naghshineh, Nader ^b   Taheri, Sayyed Mahdi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASHAN   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^c Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy   (Iran)

Author keywords

Europe Patent Office; Iranian inventors; Japan Patent Office; Patents; Scientific productivity; United State Patent and Trademark Office; World Intellectual Property Organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867732370     PISSN: 22518223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bacchiocchi E., ad F. Montobbio F. 2004. EPO vs. USPTO citation lags. CESPRI working paper, n. 161 (working paper). ftp://ftp.unibocconi.it/pub/RePEc/ cri/papers/WP161Montobbio.pdf (accessed 20
2. Balconi, M., Stefano Breschi, and Francesco Lissoni. 2004. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy 33 (1): 127-145.
3. Bernardes, A. T., R. M. Ruiz, L. C. Ribeiro, and E. M. Albuquerque. 2006. Modelling economic growth fuelled by science and technology. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar.
4. Branstetter, L. 2004. Is the academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? Evidence from patent citations. http://www.rieti.go.jp/ jp/columns/a01-0119.pdf (accessed 19 April 2010).
5. Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, and F. Montobbio. 2005. The scinetific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from italian data. http://eco.uninsubria.it/webdocenti/fmontobbio/papers/EINT2007.pdf (accessed 19 April 2010).
6. Durack, Katherine T .2001. Research opportunities in the us patent record. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15. http://jbt.sagepub. com/ (accessed 29 April 2010).
7. Eisenschitz, T. S., A. M. Lazard, and C. J. Willey. 1986. Patent groups and their relationship with journal literature. Journal of Information Science 12 (53). http://jis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1- 2/53 (accessed 29 April 2010).
8. European Commission. 1997. Second European Report on S&T Indicators. Bruxelles: European Commission.
9. Karki, M. M. 1997. Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Information 19 (4): 269- 272.
10. Kowalski, T. J., A. Maschio, and Samuel H. Megerditchian. 2003. Dominating global intellectual property: Overview of patentability in the USA, Europe and Japan. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 9 (4): 305-331.
11. Kurtossy, J. 2004. Innovation indicators derived from patent data. Periodica Polytechnica Ser. Soc. Man. Sci. 12 (1): 91-101.
12. Leydesdorrf, loet. 2001. The challenge of Scientometrics; the development, measurement, and selforganization of scientific communication. Boca Raton: Universal publisher.
13. Li, Xin, Yiling Lin, Hsinchun Chen, and Mihail C. Roco. 2007. Worldwide nanotechnology development: A comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976-2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 (6): 977-1002. (Pubitemid 47476846)
14. Lo, S.-C. 2004. A study of the productivity of genetic engineering research from 1991 to 2002 using the patentometrics approach. In International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, Roorkee IND, 2004-03-02, 230-246. Roorkee: Central Library, Indian Institute ofTechnology.
15. Lo, S.-C. 2007. Linkage between public science and technology development of genetic engineering: Preliminary study on patents granted to Japan, Korea and Taiwan. In International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, Nancy FRA, 2006. 36-45. Nancy FRA: COLLNET Meeting.
16. Meyer, M. S. 2001. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51 (1): 163-183. (Pubitemid 33690685)
17. OECD. 1994. Patent manual. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/62/2095942.pdf (accessed 29 April 2010).
18. OECD. 2002. Frascati manual: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD pub. OECD. 2007. Compendium of patent statistics. Paris: OECD pub.
19. Okubo, Y. 1997. Bibliometrics indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and examples. Paris: OECD pub.
20. Oppenheim, C. 2000. Do patent citations count? In The web of knowledge. B. Cromin and H. B. Atkins (eds), 405-432. Medford: Information Today, Inc.
21. Schaaper. M. 2006. Measuring research and experimental development. In Central Asian seminarworkshop on science, technology and innovation indicators: Trends and challenges, Almaty, Kazakhstan. 27-29 November. Montreal: Unesco Institute for Statistics. [Workshop ppt file] http://www.docstoc.com/docs/ 72243947/Measuring-R-D-expenditure-Expenditure-on-R-D#(accessed 30 April 2010).
22. WIPO. 2007. WIPO patent report: Statistics on worldwide patent activities. World Intellectual Property Organization. http://www.wipo.int/ export/sites/www/freepublications/en/patents/931/wipo-pub-931.pdf (accessed 30 April 2010).