Breast cancer diagnosis based on a kernel orthogonal transform

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1865-1870

  Xu, Yong ^a   Zhu, Qi ^a   Wang, Jinghua ^b  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Breast cancer diagnosis; Kernel method; Machine learning; Pattern recognition

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DATA SETS; KERNEL METHODS; MACHINE LEARNING METHODS; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE; ORTHOGONAL TRANSFORMS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; WISCONSIN;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL TESTS;

DISEASES;

EID: 84867725440     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-011-0547-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. http://www. who. int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/.
2. Ki{dotless}yan T, Yi{dotless}ldi{dotless}ri{dotless}m T (2003) Breast cancer diagnosis using statistical neural networks, XII. In: TAINN symposium proceedings, E(8).
3. West D, Mangiameli P, Rampal R, West V (2005) Ensemble strategies for a medical diagnosis decision support system: a breast cancer diagnosis. Eur J Oper Res 162: 532-551.
4. Xu Y, Yang JY, Yang J (2004) A reformative kernel fisher discriminant analysis. Pattern Recogn 37: 1299-1302.
5. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 74-108.
6. Quinlan JR (1996) Improved use of continuous attributes in C4. 5. J Artific Intell Res 4: 77-90.
7. Abonyi J, Szeifert F (2003) Supervised fuzzy clustering for the identification of fuzzy classifiers. Pattern Recognit Lett 24: 2195-2207.
8. Nauck D, Kruse R (1999) Obtaining interpretable fuzzy classification rules from medical data. Artif Intell Med 16: 149-169.
9. Hamilton HJ, Shan N, Cercone N (1996) RIAC: a rule induction algorithm based on approximate classification, Technical Report CS 96-06, University of Regina.
10. Ster B, Dobnikar A (1996) Neural networks in medical diagnosis: comparison with other methods. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering applications of neural networks, pp 427-430.
11. Bennet KP, Blue JA (1997) A support vector machine approach to decision trees. Math Report, No. 97-100, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
12. Akay MF (2009) Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl 36: 3240-3247.
13. Wang J, You J, Li Q, Xu Y (2011) orthogonal discriminant vectors for face recognition across pose, Pattern Recognition (in press).
14. Schölkopf B et al (1999) Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(5): 1000-1017.