Mining millions of reviews: A technique to rank products based on importance of reviews

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Zhang, Kunpeng ^a   Cheng, Yu ^a   Liao, Wei Keng ^a   Choudhary, Alok ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED MINING; CUSTOMER REVIEW; INFORMED DECISION; ONLINE SHOPPING; POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS; PRODUCT DURABILITY; PRODUCT QUALITY; PRODUCT REVIEWS; PURCHASING DECISIONS; RANKING MODEL;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

SALES;

EID: 84867724826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2378104.2378116     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Baccianella, S.; Esuli, A.; and Sebastiani, F. 2009. Multifacet rating of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 31th European Conference on IR Research on Advances in Information Series, 461-472.
2. ConsumerReports. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/index.htm.
3. Correlation, S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spearman's-rank-correlation- coefficient.
4. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C.; Kossinets, G.; Kleinberg, J.; and Lee, L. 2009. How opinions are received by online communities: A case study on amazon.com helpfulness votes. In 18th International World Wide Web Conference, 141-150.
5. Ghose, A., and P., I. G. 2007. Designing novel review ranking systems: Predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, 303-310.
6. Hofmann, T. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In UAI, Stockholem.
7. Hu, M., and Liu, B. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discivery and Data Mining, 168-177.
8. Jeffrey, R., and Ratnaparkhi, A. 1997. A maximum entropy approach to identifying sentence boundaries. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing.
9. Kim, S.; Pantel, P.; Chklovski, T.; and Pennacchiotti, M. 2006. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 423-430.
10. Liu, J.; Cao, Y.; Lin, C.-Y.; Huang, Y.; and Zhou, M. 2007. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. In EMNLP-CoNLL(Poster), 334-342.
11. Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; An, A.; and Yu, X. 2008. Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 443-452.
12. Lu, Y.; Zhai, C.; and Sundaresan, N. 2009. Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In 18th International World Wide Web Conference, 131-140.
13. McGlohon, M.; Glance, N.; and Reiter, Z. 2010. Star quality: Aggregating reviews to rank products and merchants. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 114-121.
14. Nobata, C.; Sekine, S.; and Isahara, H. 2003. Evaluation of features for sentence extraction on different types of corpora. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering, 29-36.
15. Pang, B., and Lee, L. 2004. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In ACL, 271.
16. Pang, B.; Lee, L.; and Vaithyanathan, S. 2002. Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
17. Ratnaparkhi, A. 1996. A maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference.
18. Tsur, O., and Rappoport, A. 2009. Revrank: A fully unsupervised algorithm for selecting the most helpful book reviews. In Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
19. Tsur, O.; Davidov, D.; and Rappoport, A. 2010. Icwsm-a great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In PProceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
20. Turpin, A., and Scholer, F. 2006. User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in information Retrieval, 11-18.
21. Vapnik, V. 1995. The nature of statistical learning theory. In Springer.
22. WordNet. 2010. http://wordnet.princeton.edu.
23. Zhang, R., and Trani, T. 2008. An entropy-based model for discovering the usefulness of online product reviews. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 759-762.
24. Zhang, Z., and Varadarajan, B. 2006. Utility scoring of product reviews. In CIKM, 51-57.
25. Zhang, K.; Narayanan, R.; and Choudhary, A. 2010. Voice of the customers: Mining online customer reviews for product feature-based ranking. In 3rdWorkshop on Online Social Networks.