Validating digital evidence for legal argument

Proceedings of the 6th Australian Digital Forensics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 41-58

  Boddington, Richard ^a   Hobbs, Valerie ^a   Mann, Graham ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Digital evidence; Legal argument; Validation of evidence; Weight of evidence

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL DOMAIN; DIGITAL EVIDENCE; LEGAL ARGUMENT; LEGAL CASE; ROADMAP; VALIDATION OF EVIDENCE; WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE;

ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES;

EID: 84867718303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Ahmad A. (2002) The forensic chain of evidence model: Improving the process of evidence collection in incident handling procedures. The 6th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
2. Akester, P. (2004) Internet law: authenticity of works: authorship and authenticity in cyberspace. Computer Law & Security Report, 20, 436-444.
3. Anderson, T., & Twining, W (1991) Analysis of evidence: How to do things with facts based on Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof, Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press.
4. Ashcroft, J. (2001) Electronic crime scene investigation: A guide for first responders. Washington, U.S. Department of Justice.
5. Ashley, K., & Rissland, E. (1985) Toward modelling legal argument. University of Massachusetts.
6. Berk, R. A. (1983) An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386 - 398.
7. Caloyannides, M. A. (2001) Computer forensics and privacy, Norwood, Minnesota, Artech House.
8. Carrier, B. (2005a) File system forensic analysis, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Addison-Wesley
9. Carrier, B., & Spafford, E. H. (2003) Getting physical with the digital investigation process. International Journal of Digital Evidence.
10. Carrier, B. D., & Spaford, Eugene. H. (2005b) Automated digital evidence target definition using outlier analysis and existing evidence. Digital Forensic Research Workshop. New Orleans.
11. Cohen, F. (2006) Challenges to digital forensic evidence. New Haven, Fred Cohen & Associates.
12. Daum, M., & Lucks, Stefan. (2005) Attacking hash functions by poisoned messages: The Story of Alice and her boss. Bochum, CITS Research Group, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
13. Diaconis, P., & Mosteller, F. (1989) Methods for studying coincidences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 853 - 861.
14. Edwards, K. (2005) Ten things about DNA contamination that lawyers should know. Criminal Law Journal, 29, 71 - 93. (Pubitemid 40594878)
15. Egan, M., & Mather, Tim (2004) The executive guide to information security: Threats challenges and solutions, Indianapolis, Addison-Wesley: Symantec Press.
16. Etter, B. (2001a) Computer crime. 4th National Outlook Symposium on Crime in Australia - New Crimes or New Responses. Canberra, Australian Institute of Criminology.
17. Etter, B. (2001b) The forensic challenges of e-crime. Australasian Centre for Policing Research, 3, 1-8.
18. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E (1991) Social cognition New York, McGraw-Hill.
19. Flusche, K. J. (2001) Computer forensic case study: Espionage, Part 1 Just finding the file is not enough! Information Security Journal, 10, 1 - 10.
20. Huygen, P. E. M. (2002) Use of Bayesian Belief Networks in legal reasoning. 17th BILETA Annual Conference.
21. Janes, S. (2000) The role of technology in computer forensic investigations. Information Security Technical Report, 5, 43 - 50. (Pubitemid 43231475)
22. Koehler, J. J., & Thompson, William. C. (2006) Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches. American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association.
23. Lenstraand, A., & De Weger, Benne. (2005) On the possibility of constructing meaningful hash collisions for public keys. Australasian Conference on Information Security and Privacy 2005. Brisbane, Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, and Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
24. Losavio, M., Adams. J., & Rogers, M. (2006) Gap Analysis: Judicial experience and perception of electronic evidence. Journal of Digital Forensic Practice, 1, 13 - 17.
25. Mattord, H. J., & Whitman, M. E. (2004) Management of information security, Boston, Thomson learning.
26. Mercuri, R. (2005) Challenges in forensic computing. Communications of the ACM 48, 17 - 21 (Pubitemid 43906404)
27. Mohay, G. M. (2003) Computer and intrusion forensics, Boston, Artech House Inc.
28. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980) Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
29. Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z (1983) The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.
30. Ó Ciardhuain, S. (2004) An extended model of cybercrime investigations. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 3.
31. Palmer, G. L. (2001) A road map for digital forensic research. First Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS). Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome Research Site, Digital Forensic Research Workshop.
32. Palmer, G. L. (2002) Forensic analysis in the digital world. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1.
33. Pe, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969) The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation, Notre Dame, Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press.
34. Pollitt, M. M. (2001) Report on digital evidence. 13th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium Lyon, France, INTERPOL.
35. Pospesel, H., & Rodes (Jnr), Robert. E. (1997) Premises and conclusions: Symbolic logic for legal analysis, New Jersey, Pfrentice-Hall, Inc.
36. Rowlingson, R. (2004) A ten step process for forensic readiness. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 2.
37. Safterein, R. (2000) Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science, Pearson.
38. Saks, M. J., & Koehler Jonathan. J (2005) The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309, 892 - 895. (Pubitemid 41099917)
39. Schneier, B. (2000) Secrets and lies: digital security in a networked world, New York, Wiley Computer Publishing.
40. Schneier, B. (2004) Opinion: Cryptanalysis of MD5 and SHA: Time for a new standard: Crypto researchers report weaknesses in common hash functions. Computerworld.
41. Silverstone, H., & Sheetz, Michael (2007) Forensic accounting and fraud investigation for non-experts, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
42. Slade, R. (2004) Software forensics: Collecting evidence from the scene of a digital crime, New York, McGraw Hill.
43. Sommer, P. (1998) Intrusion detection systems as evidence: Recent advances in intrusion detection. London School of Economics & Political Science.
44. Sommer, P. (2000) Digital footprints: Accessing computer evidence. Criminal Law Review, 61 - 78
45. Spenceley, C. (2003) Evidentiary treatment of computer-produced material: a reliability based evaluation. Sydney, University of Sydney.
46. Tapper, C. (2004) Cross & Tapper on evidence, London, LexisNexis Butterworths.
47. Thompson, D. E., & Berwick, Desmond. R. (1998) Minimum provisions for the investigation of computer based offences. Payneham, South Australia, National Police Research Unit.
48. Tillers, P. (2005) Picturing factual inference in legal settings. Gerechtigkeitswissenschaft: Kolloquium aus Anlass des 70: Geburtstages von Lothar Philipps. Berlin.
49. Tobin, W. A., & THOMPSON, WILLIAM. C (2006) Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence. Champion Magazine.
50. Unamed (2000) The virtual horizon: meeting the law enforcement challenges: developing an Australasian law enforcement strategy for dealing with electronic crime: scoping paper. Police Commissioners' Conference - Electronic Crime Working Party 2000. Adelaide., Australasian Centre for Policing Research.
51. Wall C., & Paroff, Jason. (2004) Cracking the computer forensics mystery. UtahBar Journal, 17.
52. Whitcomb, C. M. (2002) An historical perspective of digital evidence: A forensic scientist's view. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 1.
53. Whitman, M. E., AND Mattord, H. J. (2005) Principles of information security, Boston, Massachusetts, Thomson Learning.
54. Yasinsac, A., Erbacher, R. F., Marks, D. G., Pollitt, M. M., & Sommer, P. M. (2003) Computer forensics education. IEEE Security & Privacy, 1, 15 - 23.