Q.U.i.P.S.-a quality model for investigating risk exposure in e-health systems

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 1023-1027

  Croll, Peter R ^a   Croll, Jasmine ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Medical Informatics; Quality; Software Design

Indexed keywords

EHEALTH; IMAGE QUALITY; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE DESIGN; HEALTH RISKS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

CRITICAL ATTRIBUTES; E-HEALTH SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIORITIZATION; QUALITY MODELING; TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEALTH RECORDS; QUALITY; RISK EXPOSURE; SYSTEM DEVELOPERS;

HEALTH RISKS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIVACY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TELEHEALTH; TRUST; USABILITY;

EID: 84867706682     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-1023     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bates DW and Gawande AA. Patient Safety: Improving Safety with Information Technology, New England Journal of Medicine, June 2003 Vol 348 (25), 2526-2534.
2. th edition, Addison Wesley, 2001.
3. Win KT, Croll P, Cooper J. Setting a Safety Standard for Electronic Medical Records, Proc. HIC2002, Melbourne, Australia, August 2002, ISBN 0 9585370 97
4. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human, Building a Safer Health System, Nat. Acad. Press, 2000.
5. Institute of Medicine, Doing what counts for patient safety; Federal Actions to reduce medical error and their impact, Report: Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force.http://www.quic.gov/report/mederr2.htm, 2000.
6. Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Briant R, Schug S, Scott A, Johnson S, Bingley W. Adverse events in New Zealand Public hospitals: Principal findings from a National Survey, Dec. 2001, Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
7. Pfleager SL, Hatton L and Howell CC, Solid Software, Software Quality Institute Series, Prentice Hall PTR, 2002
8. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with VDTs-Part 11: Guidance on usability, 1998.
9. Kushniruk A, Patel V, Cimino J. Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces, AMIA Annual Fall Symposium: JAMIA; p. 218-222, 1997.
10. Laerum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A. Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey, British Medical Journal, Dec 8, 2001 v323 I 7325 pl233 (5)
11. Rindfleisch T, Privacy, Information Technology, and Health Care, Comms of the ACM, v40, 1 8 p.92-100, 1997
12. National Academy of Sciences, For the Record: Protecting Electronic Health Information, CSTB Pub. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1997
13. Maguire M. Methods to support human-centred design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, p587-634. 2001
14. Dumas J, and Redish C. A practical guide to usability testing Ablex Publishing, New Jersey, 1993.
15. Succi MJ and Zhiping DW. Theory of User Acceptance of Information Technologies; Examination of Health Care Professionals, Proc. HICSS 1999.
16. Croll J, Roe K, Simpson. An Evaluation of the Implementation of CHIME in the Illawarra, Proceedings, HIC2003. 11™ National Health Informatics Conference, Sydney, August 2003.