Retail pharmacy staff perceptions of design strengths and weaknesses of electronic prescribing

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1059-1065

  Odukoya, Olufunmilola ^a   Chui, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PERCEPTION; PHARMACIST; PHARMACIST ATTITUDE; PHARMACY; PHARMACY TECHNICIAN; POLICY; PRESCRIPTION; SIERRA LEONE; STANDARD;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL PHARMACY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NARRATION; PHARMACIES; PHARMACISTS; PHARMACISTS' AIDES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WISCONSIN;

EID: 84867679377     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000779     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lapane KL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, et al. A mixed method study of the merits of e-prescribing drug alerts in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:442e6.
2. Moniz TT, Seger AC, Keohane CA, et al. Addition of electronic prescription transmission to computerized prescriber order entry: effect on dispensing errors in community pharmacies. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011;68:158e63.
3. Webster L, Spiro RF. Health information technology: a new world for pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2010;50:e20e31, quiz e32e4.
4. Astrand B, Montelius E, Petersson G, et al. Assessment of ePrescription quality: an observational study at three mail-order pharmacies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:8.
5. Kaushal R, Kern LM, Barron Y, et al. Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:530e6.
6. Thomas CP, Kim M, McDonald A, et al. Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:375e81.
7. Lapane KL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, et al. E-prescribing and patient safety: results from a mixed method study. Am J Pharm Benefits 2011;3:24e33.
8. Surescripts. The National Progress Report on E-Prescribing and Interoperable Healthcare. About E-Prescribing Web Site. 2010. http://www.surescripts.com/aboute-prescribing/progress-reports/national-progress-reports.aspx (accessed 29 Sep 2011)
9. Chan J, Shojania KG, Easty AC, et al. Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:276e81.
10. Siska MH, Tribble DA. Opportunities and challenges related to technology in supporting optimal pharmacy practice models in hospitals and health systems. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011;68:1116e26.
11. Goldberg L, Lide B, Lowry S, et al. Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S187e97.
12. Rupp MT, Warholak TL. Evaluation of e-prescribing in chain community pharmacy: best-practice recommendations. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2008;48:364e70.
13. Warholak TL, Rupp MT. Analysis of community chain pharmacists' interventions on electronic prescriptions. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2009;49:59e64.
14. Trist E. The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems. Occasional Paper No. 2. In: Van de Ven A, Joyce W, eds. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior. Ontario, Canada: Wiley Interscience, 1981. http://www.sociotech.net/wiki/images/9/ 94/Evolution_of_socio_technical_systems.pdf (accessed 22 Jun 2012).
15. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health caredan interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:542e9.
16. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behav and Ion Techngy 2009;28:21e38.
17. Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Hundt AS, et al. Observing nurse interaction with infusion pump technologies. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, et al, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2005.
18. Lundgren-Laine H, Salantera S. Think-aloud technique and protocol analysis in clinical decision-making research. Qual Health Res 2010;20:565e75.
19. Fairbanks RJ, Caplan SH, Bishop PA, et al. Usability study of two common defibrillators reveals hazards. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:424e32.
20. Wu RC, Orr MS, Chignell M, et al. Usability of a mobile electronic medical record prototype: a verbal protocol analysis. Inform Health Soc Care 2008;33:139e49.
21. Phansalkar S, Hoffman JM, Hurdle JF, et al. Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection. J Eval Clin Pract 2009;15:266e75.
22. Pope C, May N. Qualitative Research in Healthcare. 3rd edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006.
23. Motulsky A, Winslade N, Tamblyn R, et al. The impact of electronic prescribing on the professionalization of community pharmacists: a qualitative study of pharmacists' perception. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2008;11:131e46.
24. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, et al. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:408e23.
25. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005;293:1197e203.
26. Karsh BT. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:388e94.