Paradigmatic shifts for exascale supercomputing

Journal of Supercomputing

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 1023-1044

  Davis, Neal E ^a,b   Robey, Robert W ^a   Ferenbaugh, Charles R ^a   Nicholaeff, David ^a,c   Trujillo, Dennis P ^a,d  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell based adaptive mesh refinement; Exascale computing; GPGPU; Heterogeneous architecture; Molecular dynamics

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; ADVANCED APPLICATIONS; APPLICATION DEVELOPERS; CELL-BASED; COMPUTING HARDWARE; DOMINANT DESIGN; DYNAMIC MEMORY ALLOCATION; EXASCALE COMPUTING; FINITE DIFFERENCE CALCULATIONS; GPGPU; HETEROGENEOUS ARCHITECTURES; HETEROGENEOUS DEVICES; HIGH QUALITY; LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY; MEMORY ACCESS; NUMERICAL CALCULATION; PROOF OF CONCEPT; REGULAR GRIDS; SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS; UNSTRUCTURED MESHES; VECTORIZATION;

HARDWARE; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROGRAM PROCESSORS;

SUPERCOMPUTERS;

EID: 84867678300     PISSN: 09208542     EISSN: 15730484     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-012-0789-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bergen BK, Daniels MG, Weber PM (2010) A hybrid programming model for compressible gas dynamics using OpenCL. In: 2010 39th international conference on parallel processing workshops. doi: 10.1109/ICPPW.2010.60
2. Bhatele A (2010) Automating topology aware mapping for supercomputers. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
3. Boillat J, Burkhart H, Decker K, Kropf P (1991) Parallel computing in the 1990's: attacking the software problem. Phys Rep 207(3-5):141-165
4. Bowers KJ, Albright J, Bergen B, Yin L, Barker J, Kerbyson DJ (2008) 0.374 Pflop/s trillion-particle kinetic modeling of laser plasma interaction on Roadrunner. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing, SC '08. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 63:1-63:11
5. Bowers KJ, Albright BJ, Yin L, Bergen B, Twan T (2008) Ultrahigh performance three-dimensional electromagnetic relativistic kinetic plasma simulation. Phys Plasmas 15(5):055703. doi: 10.1063/1.2840133 (Pubitemid 351776716)
6. Casaglia G (1976) Distributed computing systems: a biased review. Euromicro Newsl 2(4):5-18
7. Chen S, Gibbons B, Nath S (2011) Rethinking database algorithms for phase change memory. In: Proceedings of the 5th biennial conference on innovative data systems research (CIDR'11)
8. Davis SF (1987) A simplified TVD finite difference scheme via artificial viscosity. SIAM J Sci Comput 8(1):1-18. doi: 10.1137/0908002
9. DeVito Z, Joubert N, Palacios F, Oakley S, Medina M, Barrientos M, Elsen E, Ham F, Aiken A, Duraisamy K, Darve E, Alonso J, Hanrahan P (2011) Liszt: a domain specific language for building portable mesh-based PDE solvers. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing
10. Dongarra J (2009) An overview of HPC and challenges for the future. In: HPC Asia 2009. http://www.nchc.org.tw/en/news/index.php?NEWS-ID=49. Accessed 29 July 2011
11. Feng W, Cameron K (2007) The Green500 list: encouraging sustainable supercomputing. Computer 40(12):50-55
12. Ferenbaugh C (in review) A comparison of GPU strategies for unstructured mesh physics. Concurr Comput Pract Exp
13. Gropp W, Lusk E, Doss N, Skjellum A (1996) A high-performance, portable implementation of the MPI message passing interface standard. Parallel Comput 22(6):789-828 (Pubitemid 126364517)
14. Harvey M, Fabritiis GD (2011) Swan: a tool for porting CUDA programs to OpenCL. Comput Phys Commun 182(4):1093-1099
15. Kato S, Lakshmanan K, Kumar A, Kelkar M, Ishikawa Y, Rajkumar R (2011) RGEM: a responsive GPGPU execution model for runtime engines. In: 2011 IEEE 32nd real-time systems symposium (RTSS), pp 57-66
16. Kato S, McThrow M, Maltzahn C, Brandt S (in press) Gdev: first-class GPU resource management in the operating system. In: 2012 USENIX annual technical conference (USENIX ATC'12)
17. Khaleel MA (2010) 2010 exascale workshop panel report meeting. Technical report PNNL-19515, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Department of Energy, Washington, DC
18. Klimovitski A (2001) Using SSE and SSE2: misconceptions and reality. In: Intel developer update magazine, March 2001, pp 1-8
19. Kogge P, Bergman K, Borkar S, Campbell D, Carlson W, Dally W, Denneau M, Franzon P, Harrod W, Hill K, Hiller J, Karp S, Keckler S, Klein D, Lucas R, Richards M, Scarpelli A, Scott S, Snavely A, Sterling T, Williams RS, Yelick K (2008) Exascale computing study: Technology challenges in achieving exascale systems. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.165.6676. Accessed 23 March 2012
20. Los Alamos National Laboratory (2011) Flag 3.2 alpha 5 radiation-hydrodynamics code (LA-CC 11-065)
21. Message Passing Interface Forum (1994) MPI: a message-passing interface standard. Int J Supercomput Appl High Perform Comput 8(3-4):159-416
22. Mills A, Wood L (1981) Cray-1: a powerful delivery system for engineering software. Adv Eng Softw 3(2):62-66 (Pubitemid 11518549)
23. Nicholaeff D, Davis N, Trujillo D Robey, R (in review) A cell-based adaptive mesh refinement implemented with general-purpose graphics processing units. SIAM J Sci Comput
24. Oyanagi Y (2002) Future of supercomputing. J Comput Appl Math 149(1):147-153 (Pubitemid 35404890)
25. Pao K (2011) Co-design and you: why should mathematicians care about exascale computing. In: 2011 DOE applied mathematics program meeting
26. Papadrakakis M, Stavroulakis G, Karatarakis A (2011) A new era in scientific computing: domain decomposition methods in hybrid CPU-GPU architectures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(13-16):1490-1508
27. Robey RN, Nicholaeff D Robey, RW (in review) Hash-based algorithms for discretized data. SIAM J Sci Comput
28. Simon H, Zacharia T, Stevens R (2007) Modeling and simulation at the exascale for energy and the environment. Technical report, Department of Energy, Washington, DC
29. Snir M, Gropp W, Kogge P (2011) Exascale research: preparing for the post-Moore era. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/25469. Accessed 25 July 2011
30. Sottile M, Rasmussen C, Weseloh W, Robey R, Quinlan D, Overbey, J (in press) ForOpenCL: transformations exploiting array syntax in Fortran for accelerator programming. Int J Comp Sci Eng
31. Sottile MJ, Rasmussen CE, Weseloh WN, Robey RW, Quinlan J, Overbey J (2011) ForOpenCL: transformations exploiting array syntax in fortran for accelerator programming. CoRR abs/1107.2157
32. Tendler J, Dodson JS, Fields S, Le H, Sinharoy B (2002) POWER4 system microarchitecture. IBM J Res Dev 46(1):5-25 (Pubitemid 34690339)
33. Wolfe M (2008) How we should program GPGPUs. Linux Journal, November 2008. http://www.linuxjournal.com/magazine/how-we-should-program-gpgpus. Accessed 29 July 2011
34. Yang XJ, Liao XK, Lu K, Hu QF, Song JQ, Su JS (2011) The TianHe-1A supercomputer: its hardware and software. J Comput Sci Technol 26(3):344-351
35. Young J (2011) Supercomputers let up on speed. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 2011. http://chronicle.com/article/In-University- Supercomputing/126979/. Accessed 20 July 2011
36. Zhang C, Yuan X, Srinivasan A (2010) Processor affinity and MPI performance on SMP-CMP clusters. In: 2010 IEEE international symposium on parallel distributed processing, workshops and PhD forum (IPDPSW), pp 1-8. doi: 10.1109/IPDPSW.2010.5470774