Mer brukermedvirkning?

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 132, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 1882-1884

  Rise, Marit By ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 84867674883     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 08077096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0620     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Andreassen T. The consumerism of «voice» in Norwegian health policy and its dynamics in the transformation of health services. Public Money & Management 2009; 29: 117-22.
2. Pasienten først! Ledelse og organisering i sykehus. NOU 1997: 2.
3. Lov om pasientrettigheter (pasientrettighetsloven), 1999: 63
4. Lov om helseforetak (helseforetaksloven), 2001: 93
5. Haukelien H, Møller G, Vike H. Brukermedvirkning i helse- og omsorgssektoren. TF-rapport 284/2011. Bø: Telemarksforskning, 2011.
6. Solbjør M, Steinsbekk A. Brukermedvirkning i sykehusavdelinger-helsepersonellets erfaringer. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2011; 131: 130-1.
7. May CR, Mair F, Finch T et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 29.
8. Forster DA, Newton M, McLachlan H et al. Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help? BMC Public Health 2011; 11 (suppl 5): S8.
9. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL et al. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85: 53-62.
10. Rise MB, Solbjør M, Lara M et al. Same description, different values. How service users and providers define patient and public involvement in health care. Health Expectations. E-publisert 12.8.2011.
11. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Smith C et al. Consumers' views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches. Health Expect 2001; 4: 151-61.
12. Tempfer CB, Nowak P. Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2011; 123: 408-14.
13. Learmonth M, Martin GP, Warwick P. Ordinary and effective: the Catch-22 in managing the public voice in health care? Health Expect 2009; 12: 106-15.
14. Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient-focused interventions. A review of the evidence. London: The Health Foundation, 2006.
15. Daykin N, Sanidas M, Tritter J et al. Developing user involvement in a UK cancer network: professionals' and users' perspectives. Crit Public Health 2004; 14: 277-94.
16. Joosten EAG, Defuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH et al. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77: 219-26.
17. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73: 526-35.
18. Coulter A. Engaging patients in health care. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011.
19. Rutter D, Maley C, Weaver T et al. Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Soc Sc Med 2004; 58