Learning representations for animated motion sequence and implied motion recognition

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7552 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2012, Pages 288-295

  Layher, Georg ^a   Giese, Martin A ^b   Neumann, Heiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION SEQUENCES; COMPUTATIONAL CAPACITY; CORTICAL AREAS; CORTICAL MODELS; FEEDBACK CONNECTION; INTERMEDIATE LEVEL; KEYPOSES; LEARNING PROCESS; MOTION INFORMATION; MOTION INPUT; MOTION PATTERN; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTION RECOGNITION; MOTION REPRESENTATION; MOTION SEQUENCES; NETWORK SIMULATION; NEURAL REPRESENTATIONS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

MOTION ESTIMATION; NEURAL NETWORKS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84867674857     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33269-2_37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Baker, C.I., Keysers, C., Jellema, T., Wicker, B., Perrett, D.I.: Neuronal representation of disappearing and hidden objects in temporal cortex of the macaque. Exp. Brain Res. 140, 375-381 (2001)
2. Barraclough, N.E., Xiao, D., Oram, M.W., Perrett, D.I.: The sensitivity of primate STS neurons to walking sequences and to the degree of articulation in static images. Progress in Brain Res. 154, 135-148 (2006)
3. Bayerl, P., Neumann, H.: Disambiguating visual motion through contextual feedback modulation. Neural Computation 16, 2041-2066 (2004)
4. Carpenter, G.A., Grossberg, S. (eds.): Pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)
5. Casile, A., Giese, M.A.: Roles of Motion and Form in Biological Motion Recognition. In: Kaynak, O., Alpaydin, E., Oja, E., Xu, L. (eds.) ICANN 2003 and ICONIP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2714, pp. 854-862. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
6. Escobar, M.-J., Masson, G.S., Vieville, T., Kornprobst, P.: Action recognition using a bio-inspired feedforward spiking network. Intl. J. of Computer Vision 83, 284-301 (2009)
7. Földiak, P.: Learning invariances from transformation sequences. Neural Computation 3, 194-200 (1991)
8. Giese, M.A., Poggio, T.: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 179-192 (2003)
9. Hansen, T., Neumann, H.: A recurrent model of contour integration in primary visual cortex. J. of Vision 8(8), 1-25 (2008)
10. Jellema, T., Perrett, D.I.: Cells in monkey STS responsive to articulated body motions and consequent static posture: a case of implied motion? Neuropsychologia 41, 1728-1737 (2003)
11. Jhuang, H., Serre, T., Wolf, L., Poggio, T.: A biologically inspired system for action recognition. In: Proc. IEEE 11th Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, ICCV 2007, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, October 14-20 (2007)
12. Kourtzi, Z., Kanwisher, N.: Activation of human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. J. of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 48-55 (2000)
13. Oja, E.: A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. J. of Math. Biology 15, 267-273 (1982)
14. Oram, M.W., Perrett, D.I.: Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. J. of Neurophysiology 76(1), 109-129 (1996)
15. Schindler, K., Van Gool, L.: Action snippets: How many frames does human action recognition require? In: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2008, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, June 22-24 (2008)
16. Singer, J.M., Sheinberg, D.L.: Temporal cortex neurons encode articulated actions as slow sequences of integrated poses. J. of Neuroscience 30(8), 3133-3145 (2010)