A data mining ontology for algorithm selection and meta-mining

ECML PKDD 2009 - European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Third Generation Data Mining: Towards Service-Oriented Knowledge Discovery, SoKD 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 76-87

  Hilario, Melanie ^a   Kalousis, Alexandros ^a   Nguyen, Phong ^a   Woznica, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COST FUNCTIONS; DATA HANDLING; DATA MINING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ALGORITHM SELECTION; CANDIDATE MODELS; INDUCTIVE BIAS; LEARNING TASKS; OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY; PARAMETER SETTING; PERFORMANCE CRITERION; PERFORMANCE OF ALGORITHM;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84867653110     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. D. W. Aha. Generalizing from case studies: a case study. In D. Sleeman and P. Edwards, editors, Proc. of the 9th International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 1-10. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
2. S. Ali and K. Smith-Miles. A meta-learning approach to automatic kernel selection for support vector machines. Neurocomputing, 70(1-3):173-186, 2006.
3. H. Bensusan and C. Giraud-Carrier. Discovering task neighbourhoods through landmark learning performances. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 325-330, 2000.
4. A. Bernstein, F. Provost, and S. Hill. Toward intelligent assistance for a data mining process: An ontology-based approach for cost-sensitive classification. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(4):503-518, 2005.
5. C. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006.
6. P. B. Brazdil and R. J. Henery. Analysis of results. In Michie et al. [19], chapter 10, pages 175-212.
7. P. Brezany, I. Janciak, and A. Min Tjoa. Ontology-based construction of grid data mining workflows. In H. O. Nigro, S. E. Gonzalez Cisaro, and D. H. Xodo, editors, Data Mining with Ontologies: Implementations, Findings and Frameworks. IGI Global, 2008.
8. M. Cannataro and C. Comito. A data mining ontology for grid programming. In Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Semantics in Peer-to-Peer and Grid Computing, in conjunction with WWW2003, pages 113-134, 2003.
9. R. Caruana and A. Niculescu-Mizil. An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.
10. Christian Kopf Charles, Charles Taylor, and Jorg Keller. Meta-analysis: From data characterisation for meta-learning to meta-regression. In Proceedings of the PKDD-00 Workshop on Data Mining, Decision Support, Meta-Learning and ILP, 2000.
11. S. J. Cunningham. Dataset cataloging metadata for machine learning applications and research. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on AI and Statistics 1997, Fort Lauerdale, FL, 1997.
12. J. Demsar. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1-30, 2006.
13. W. Duch and K. Grudzinski. Meta-learning: Searching in the model space. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP), Shanghai 2001, pages 235-240, 2001.
14. A. Feelders and W. Verkooijen. On the statistical comparison of inductive learning methods, chapter 26, pages 271-279. Springer, 1996.
15. G. H. John and P. Langley. Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. In P. Besnard and S. Hanks, editors, Procs. Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 338-345. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
16. A. Kalousis and M. Hilario. Model selection via meta-learning. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 10(4), 2001.
17. J. U. Kietz, F. Serban, A. Bernstein, and S. Fischer. Towards cooperative planning of data mining workflows. In Submitted to the ECML/PKDD-2009 Workshop on Third Generation Data Mining: Service Oriented Knowledge Discovery, 2009.
18. T. Lim, W. Loh, and Y. Shih. A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity, and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms. Machine Learning, 40:35-75, 2000.
19. D. Michie, D. J. Spiegelhalter, and C. C. Taylor, editors. Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Ellis-Horwood, 1994.
20. P. Panov, S. Dzeroski, and L. Soldatova. Ontodm: An ontology of data mining. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pages 752-760, 2008.
21. B. Pfahringer, H. Bensusan, and C. Giraud-Carrier. Meta-learning by landmarking various learning algorithms. In Proc. Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML'2000, pages 743-750, San Francisco, California, June 2000. Morgan Kaufmann.
22. L. Rendell and E. Cho. Empirical learning as a function of concept character. Machine Learning, 5:267-298, 1990.
23. J. Rice. The algorithm selection problem. Advances in Computing, 15:65-118, 1976.
24. K. A. Smith-Miles. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(1), 2008.
25. Joaquin Vanschoren, Hendrik Blockeel, Bernhard Pfahringer, and Geoff Holmes. Experiment databases: Creating a new platform for meta-learning research. In Planning to Learn Workshop, ICML/COLT/UAI-2008, pages 10-15, Helsinki, July 2008.
26. D. Wolpert. The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 8(7):1381-1390, 1996.
27. Monika Zakova, Petr Kfemen, F. Železný, and N. Lavrac. Using ontologi-cal reasoning and planning for data mining workflow composition. In SoKD: ECML/PKDD 2008 workshop on Third Generation Data Mining: Towards Service-oriented Knowledge Discovery, 2008.
28. Monika Zakova, Petr Kfemen, Filip Železný, and Nada Lavrac. Planning to learn with a knowledge discovery ontology. In Planning to Learn Workshop (PlanLeam 2008) at ICML 2008, 2008.