Taxonomy-Based glyph design-With a case study on visualizing workflows of biological experiments

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2603-2612

  Maguire, Eamonn ^a   Rocca Serra, Philippe ^a   Sansone, Susanna Assunta ^a   Davies, Jim ^a   Chen, Min ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bioinformatics visualization; design methodologies; Glyph based techniques; taxonomies

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; GLYPH-BASED TECHNIQUES; SYSTEMATIC PROCESS; VISUAL CHANNELS; VISUAL SEARCH; WORK-FLOWS;

BIOINFORMATICS; EXPERIMENTS; TAXONOMIES; VISUALIZATION;

DESIGN;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; SEMANTICS; WORKFLOW;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEMANTICS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84867635081     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.271     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arrayexpress. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/.
2. Gene expression omnibus (geo). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.
3. Graphviz. http://graphviz.org/.
4. R. Abdullah and R. Hümber. Pictograms, Icons & Signs: A guide to Information Graphics. Thames&Hudson, 2006.
5. M. Bar. Visual objects in context. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 5(8):617-629, 2004. (Pubitemid 39013593)
6. P. Barker and J. Fraser. Sign design guide: a guide to inclusive signage. JMU and Sign Design Society, 2000.
7. J. Bertin. Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. University of Wisconsin press, 1983.
8. R. Borgo, A. Abdul-Rahman, F. Mohamed, P. W. Grant, I. Reppa, L. Floridi, and M. Chen. An empirical study on using visual embellishments in visualization. to appear in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2012.
9. R. Bourqui and M. Westenberg. Visualizing temporal dynamics at the genomic and metabolic level. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Information Visualisation, pages 317-322, 2009.
10. B. Burns, B. E. Shepp, D. McDonough, and W. K. Wiener-Ehrlich. The relation between stimulus analyzability and perceived dimensional structure. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, pages 77-115, 1978.
11. Y. Cai, M. L. Wilson, and J. Peccoud. Genocad for igem: a grammatical approach to the design of standard-compliant constructs. Nucleic Acids Res, 38(8):2637-44,May 2010.
12. M. Chen and H. Jänicke. An information-theoretic framework for visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):1206-1215, 2010.
13. M. Chuah and S. Eick. Information rich glyphs for software management data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18:24-29, 1998. (Pubitemid 128580382)
14. T. Czauderna, C. Klukas, and F. Schreiber. Editing, validating and translating of sbgn maps. Bioinformatics, 26(18):2340-2341, 2010.
15. J. Duncan and G. Humphreys. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological review, 96(3):433-491, 1989.
16. J. Franks and J. Bransford. Abstraction of visual patterns. Journal of experimental psychology, 90(1):65-139, 1971.
17. M. Green. Toward a perceptual science of multidimensional data visualization: Bertin and beyond. ERGO/GERO Human Factors Science, 1998.
18. S. Handelt and S. Imai. The free classification of analyzable and unanalyzable stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 12(1):108-224, 1972.
19. C. G. Healey and J. T. Enns. Attention and visual memory attention and visual memory in visualization and computer graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(7):1170-1188, 2011.
20. J. Heer, S. K. Card, and J. A. Landay. prefuse: A toolkit for interactive information visualization. In Proc. ACM CHI, pages 421-430, 2005. (Pubitemid 41809079)
21. K. Hemenway. Psychological issues in the use of icons in command menus. In Proc. ACM CHI, pages 20-23, 1982.
22. B. H. Junker, C. Klukas, and F. Schreiber. Vanted: A system for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
23. A. Karve and M. Gleicher. Glyph-based overviews of large datasets in structural bioinformatics. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Information Visualization, Supplements, pages 1-6, 2007.
24. R. Kinchla and J. Wolfe. The order of visual processing: "top-down," "bottom-up", or "middle-out". Perception & psychophysics, 25(3), 1979.
25. G. Kindlmann and C.-F.Westin. Diffusion tensor visualization with glyph packing. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):1329-1335, 2006. (Pubitemid 44955672)
26. D. Krantz and A. Tversky. Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12(1), 1975.
27. R. Krishnapuram and K. Kummamuru. Automatic taxonomy generation: Issues and possibilities. In Proc. IFSA 2003, LNCS, pages 184-195, 2003.
28. N. Le Novere, M. Hucka, H. Mi, S. Moodie, and et al. The systems biology graphical notation. Nat Biotechnol, 27(8), 2009.
29. J. P. Lewis and R. Rosenholtz. VisualIDs: Automatic distinctive icons for desktop interfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23(3):416-423, 2004.
30. B. Love, J. Rouder, and E. Wisniewski. A structural account of global and local processing. Cognitive psychology, 38(2):291-607, 1999.
31. S. Luck and S. Hillyard. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3):291-308, 1994. (Pubitemid 24130284)
32. E. Maguire. Taxonomy in biology and visualization. http: //isatab. sourceforge.net/docs/publications/Taxonomy.pdf, Jan 2012.
33. S. McDougall, O. De Bruijn, and M. Curry. Exploring the effects of icon characteristics on user performance: The role of icon concreteness, complexity, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(4), 2000.
34. P. Muter and D. Mayson. The role of graphics in item selection from menus. Behaviour and Information Technology, 5:89-95, 1986.
35. D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive psychology, 9(3):353-736, 1977.
36. D. A. Norman. The Design of Everyday Things. BasicBooks, 2002.
37. H. Ogata, S. Goto, K. Sato, W. Fujibuchi, H. Bono, and M. Kanehisa. Kegg: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. NAR, 27(1), 1999.
38. S. Palmer. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9(4):441-915, 1977.
39. D. Parkhurst, K. Law, and E. Niebur. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision research, 42(1), 2002.
40. J. K. Patel and C. B. Read. Handbook of the Normal Distribution. Marcel Dekker, 2nd edition, 1996.
41. J.W. Pellegrino, R. R. Rosinski, H. L. Chiesi, and A. Siegel. Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models. Memory and Cognition, 5:383-396, 1977. (Pubitemid 8161468)
42. F. Post, T. Walsum, F. Post, and D. Silver. Iconic techniques for feature visualization. Proc. IEEE Visualization, pages 288-295, 1995.
43. P. Quinlan. Visual feature integration theory: past, present, and future. Psychological bulletin, 129(5):643-716, 2003.
44. P. Quinlan and G. Humphreys. Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: an examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception & psychophysics, 41(5):455-527, 1987.
45. W. Ribarsky, E. Ayers, and J. Eble. Glyphmaker: creating customized visualizations of complex data. Computer, 27:57-64, 1994.
46. P. Rocca-Serra, E. Maguire, S.-A. Sansone, and et al. Isa software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics, 26(18), 2010.
47. Rohrer and et al. The shape of shakespeare: visualizing text using implicit surfaces. In Proc. IEEE Visualization, pages 121-129, 1998.
48. T. Ropinski, S. Oeltze, and B. Preim. Survey of glyph-based visualization techniques for spatial multivariate medical data. Computers & Graphics, 35(2):392 -401, 2011.
49. D. E. Rumelhart. A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays. Journal of Math. Psych., 7(2):191-218, 1970.
50. S.-A. Sansone, P. Rocca-Serra, D. Field, E. Maguire, and et al. Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet, 44(2):121-6, 2012.
51. R. Shepard. Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1(1):54-141, 1964.
52. H. Siirtola. The effect of data-relatedness in interactive glyphs. In Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Information Visualization, 2002.
53. G. Sperling. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11):1-29, 1960.
54. K. T. Spoehr and S. W. Lehmkuhle. Visual Information Processing. W. H. Freeman & Company, 1982.
55. A. Treisman. Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 22(1), 1977.
56. A. Treisman and S. Gormican. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol Rev, 95(1):15-48, Jan 1988.
57. Q. Wang, P. Cavanagh, and M. Green. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Percept Psychophys, 56(5):495-500, Nov 1994.
58. M. O. Ward. Multivariate data glyphs: Principles and practice. In Handbook of Data Visualization, pages 179-198. 2008.
59. C. Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
60. S. Wiedenbeck. The use of icons and labels in an end user application program: an empirical study of learning and retention. Behavior and Information Technology, 18(2):68-82, 1999.
61. L. Williams. The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Acta psychologica, 27:355-415, 1967.
62. C. Wittenbrink, A. Pang, and S. Lodha. Glyphs for visualizing uncertainty in vector field. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2:266-279, 1996. (Pubitemid 126781407)
63. J. Wolfe, K. Cave, and S. Franzel. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 15(3):419-452, 1989.