An OxiTop® protocol for screening plant material for its biochemical methane potential (BMP)

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1416-1423

  Pabon Pereira C P ^a,b   Castanares G ^b   Van Lier, J B ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ADOLFO IBÁÑEZ   (Chile)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anaerobic biodegradability; BMP test; Energy crops; NaOH pellets; Pretreatments

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; BMP TEST; ENERGY CROPS; HEADSPACES; PLANT MATERIAL; PLANT SAMPLES; PRE-TREATMENTS; PRETREATMENT METHODS; SCREENING PLANTS; TEST CONDITION;

AGRICULTURE; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIODEGRADATION; BOTTLES; CARBON DIOXIDE; GRINDING (COMMINUTION); METHANE;

PELLETIZING;

CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANE; SODIUM HYDROXIDE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIODEGRADATION; ENERGY CROP; GUIDELINE; METHANE; PH;

ABSORPTION; ANAEROBIC CAPACITY; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CHEMICAL REACTION; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; PH; PLANT PRODUCT; PLANT STRUCTURES; PRESSURE; SCREENING;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; METHANE; PLANTS;

EID: 84867627231     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.305     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Angelidaki, I. & Sanders, W. 2004 Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Reviews in Environmental Science Biotechnology 3 (2), 117-129. (Pubitemid 46640406)
2. Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J. L., Guwy, A. J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P. & van Lier, J. B. 2009 Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Science and Technology 59 (5), 927-934.
3. APHA 1998 Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
4. Broesder, J. T., Gunter, S. A., Krysl, L. J. & Judkins, M. B. 1992 Digestion of ruminal masticate dried by three different methods. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37, 323-331.
5. Chynoweth, D. P. & Jerger, D. E. 1985 Anaerobic digestion of woody biomass. Developments in Industrial Microbiology 26, 235-245.
6. Hansen, T. L., Jansen, J. I. C., Davidsson, A. & Christensen, T. H. 2007 Effects of pretreatments technologies on quantity and quality of source-sorted municipal organic waste for biogas recovery. Waste Management 27, 398-405. (Pubitemid 46073723)
7. Hills, D. & Nakano, K. 1984 Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of tomato solid wastes. Agricultural Wastes 10, 285-295. (Pubitemid 14628654)
8. NEN 7434 1998. NEN. Nederlands Normalisatie-instituut. Postbus 5059 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands.
9. Owen,W. F., Stuckey, D. C., Healy, J. B., Young, L. Y. & McCarty, P. L. 1979 Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research 13, 485-492.
10. Pabón Pereira, C. P., Zeeman, G., Zhao, J., Ekmekci, B. & van Lier, J. B. 2009 Implications of reactor type and conditions on first-order hydrolysis rate assessment of maize silage. Water Science and Technology 60 (7), 1829-1836.
11. Palmowski, L. M. & Muller, J. A. 2000 Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology 41 (3), 155-162. (Pubitemid 30246462)
12. Parissi, Z. M., Khazaal, K., Nastis, A. S. & Tsiouvaras, C. N. 2001 Assessment of the effect of drying methods on the chemical composition and in vitro gas production of two woody. Seminar of the Sub-Network on Nutrition of the FAOCIHEAM Inter-Regional Cooperative Research and Development Network on Sheep and Goats, Hammamet, Tunisia, 8-10 Nov 2001.
13. Pommier, S., Manas, A. & Lefebvre, X. 2010 Analysis of the outcome of shredding pretreatments on the anaerobic biodegradability of paper and cardboard materials. Bioresource Technology 101, 463-468.
14. Reid, I. D. 1989 Solid-state fermentations for biological delignification. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 11, 786-803. (Pubitemid 20048718)
15. Rudrum, D. 2005 Innovations in Composting Pig Manure. Wageningen University, Wageningen, p. 170.
16. Sanders, W. T. M., Geerink, M., Zeeman, G. & Lettinga, G. 2000 Anaerobic hydrolysis kinetics of particulate substrates. Water Science and Technology 3 (41), 17-24. (Pubitemid 30246446)
17. Sharma, S., Mishra, I. M. & Sharma, M. P. 1988 Effect of particle size on biogas generation from biomass residues. Biomass 17, 251-263. (Pubitemid 19132737)
18. Soest, P. J. van, Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Sciences 74, 3583-3597.
19. Souto, T., Aquino, S., Silva, S. & Chernicharo, C. 2009 Infl uence of incubation conditions on the specific methanogenic activity test. Biodegradation 21 (3), 411-424.
20. Thomashow, M. F. 1998 Role of cold-responsive genes in plant freezing tolerance. Plant Physiology 118 (1), 1-7. (Pubitemid 128652963)
21. Tong, X., Smith, L. H. & Mc. Carty, P. L. 1990 Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. Biomass 21, 239-255. (Pubitemid 20693324)