The effect of reduced-fat labelling on chocolate expectations

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 101-105

  Norton, J E ^a   Fryer, P J ^a   Parkinson, J A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chocolate; Consumption amount; Expectations; Liking; Sensory attributes; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 84867616557     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Carlsmith J.M., Aronson E. Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963, 66:151-156.
2. Deliza R., MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11(2):103-128.
3. Di Monaco R., Ollila S., Tuorila H. Effect of price on pleasantness ratings and use intentions for a chocolate bar in the presence and absence of a health claim. Journal of Sensory Studies 2005, 20(1):1-16.
4. Egger G., Swinburn B. An " ecological" approach to the obesity pandemic. BMJ 1997, 315(7106):477-480.
5. Kähkönen, P. (2000). Consumer acceptance of reduced- fat foods - The effects of product information. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki.
6. Kähkönen P., Hakanpää P., Tuorilla H. The effect of information related to fat content and taste on consumer responses to a reduced-fat frankfurter and a reduced-fat chocolate bar. Journal of Sensory Studies 1999, 14(1):35-46.
7. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Rita H. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7(2):87-94.
8. Kramer F.M., Rock K., Engell D. Effects of time of day and appropriateness on food intake and hedonic ratings at morning and midday. Appetite 1992, 18(1):1-13.
9. Levin I.P., Gaeth G.J. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 1988, 15(3):374-378.
10. Light A., Heymann H., Holt D.L. Hedonic responses to dairy products: Effects of fat levels, label information, and risk perception. Food Technology 1992, 47(7):54-57.
11. Lloyd H.M., Paisley C.M., Mela D.J. Barriers to the adoption of reduced-fat diets in a UK population. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1995, 95(3):316-322.
12. Mela D.J. Determinants of food choice: Relationships with obesity and weight control. Obesity 2001, 9(11S):249S-255S.
13. Morrot G., Brochet F., Dubourdieu D. The color of odors. Brain and Language 2001, 79(2):309-320.
14. NHS. (2006). Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet: England, 2006: The Information Centre.
15. Norton J.E., Fryer P.J. Investigation of changes in formulation and processing parameters on the physical properties of cocoa butter emulsions. Journal of Food Engineering 2012, 113(2):329-336.
16. Norton J.E., Fryer P.J., Parkinson J., Cox P.W. Development and characterisation of tempered cocoa butter emulsions containing up to 60% water. Journal of Food Engineering 2009, 95:172-178.
17. Pelchat M.L. Food cravings in young and elderly adults. Appetite 1997, 28(2):103-113.
18. Prentice A.M., Jebb S.A. Obesity in Britain: Gluttony or sloth?. BMJ 1995, 311(7002):437-439.
19. Provencher V., Polivy J., Herman C.P. Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more!. Appetite 2009, 52(2):340-344.
20. Rozin P., Levine E., Stoess C. Chocolate craving and liking. Appetite 1991, 17(3):199-212.
21. Shide D.J., Rolls B.J. Information about the fat content of preloads influences energy intake in healthy women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1995, 95(9):993-998.
22. Solheim R., Lawless H.T. Consumer purchase probability affected by attitude towards low-fat foods, liking, private body consciousness and information on fat and price. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7(2):137-143.
23. Stroebele N., De Castro J.M. Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition 2004, 20(9):821-838.
24. Stubenitsky K., Aaron J.I., Catt S.L., Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10(4-5):367-376.
25. Tolman E.C. The determiners of behaviors at a choice point. Psychology Review 1938, 45:1-45.
26. Torres-Moreno M., Tarrega A., Torrescasana E., Blanch C. Influence of label information of dark chocolate acceptability. Appetite 2012, 58:665-671.
27. Tuorila H., Kramer F.M., Engell D. The choice of fat-free vs. regular-fat fudge: The effects of liking for the alternative and the restraint status. Appetite 2001, 37(1):27-32.
28. van Strien T., Frijters J.E.R., Bergers G.P.A., Defares P.B. The Dutch eating behavior questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1986, 5(2):295-315.
29. Wansink B., Chandon P. Can " low-fat" nutrition labels lead to obesity?. Journal of Marketing Research 2006, 43:607-617.
30. Wansink B., van Ittersum K., Painter J.E. How descriptive food names bias sensory perceptions in restaurants. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(5):393-400.
31. Yeomans M.R., Lartamo S., Procter E.L., Lee M.D., Gray R.W. The actual, but not labelled, fat content of a soup preload alters short-term appetite in healthy men. Physiology and Behavior 2001, 73:533-540.
32. Zellner D.A., Garriga-Trillo A., Centeno S., Wadsworth E. Chocolate craving and the menstrual cycle. Appetite 2004, 42(1):119-121.