Introduction to assessment in the health professions

Assessment in Health Professions Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-20

  Downing, Steven M ^a   Yudkowsk, Rachel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867615749     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880135     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2000). ACGME Outcome Project. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/assHome.asp/
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education & American Board of Medical Specialties. (2000). Toolbox of assessment methods. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/toolbox.asp/
3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington DC:American Educational Research Association.
4. Anderson, M.B., & Kassebaum, D.G. (Eds.). (1993). Proceedings of the AAMC's consensus conference on the use of standardized patients in the teaching and evaluation of clinical skills. Academic Medicine, 68, 437-483.
5. Barrows, H.S., & Abrahamson, S. (1964). The programmed patient: A technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. Journal of Medical Education, 39, 802-805.
6. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives . New York: Longmans Green.
7. Downing, S.M. (2002). Assessment of knowledge with written test forms. In G.R. Norman, C.P.M. Van der Vleuten, & D.I. Newble (Eds.), International handbook for research in medical education (pp. 647-672). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Downing, S.M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37, 830-837.
9. Gordon, M.S. (1999). Developments in the use of simulators and multimedia computer systems in medical education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 32-36.
10. Haladyna, T.M. (1999, April). When should we use a multiple-choice format? A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
11. Harden, R., Stevenson, M., Downie, W., & Wilson, M. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examinations. British Medical Journal, 1, 447-451.
12. Harris, I.B., & Simpson, D. (2005). Christine McGuire: At the heart of the maverick measurement maven. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10, 65-80.
13. Howell, D.C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury-Wadsworth Group.
14. Miller, G. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65, S63-S67.
15. National Board of Medical Examiners. (2006). USMLE Bulletin of Information. Federation of State Medical Boards and National Board of Medical Examiners. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.usmle.org/bulletin/2006/2006bulletin.pdf/
16. Popham, W.J., & Husek, T.R. (1969). Implications of criterion-referenced measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 367-375.
17. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
18. Sireci, S.G., & Zenisky, A.L. (2006). Innovative item formats in computerbased testing: In pursuit of improved construct representation. In S.M. Downing & T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 329-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Voltaire. (1962). Philosophical dictionary (P. Gay, Trans.). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
20. Wallace, P. (1997). Following the threads of an innovation: The history of standardized patients in medical education. CADUCEUS, 13 (2), 5-28.
21. Welch, C. (2006). Item and prompt development in performance testing. In S.M. Downing & T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 303-328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. William, R.G., Klaman, D.A., & McGaghie, W.C. (2003). Cognitive, social, and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 15(4), 270-292.