Getting research published internationally in English: An ethnographic account of a team of finance Spanish scholars' struggles;Publicar la investigación en inglés en el ámbito internacional: Una visión etnográfica sobre las dificultades de un grupo de investigadores Españoles en el campo de las Finanzas

Iberica

Volumn 24, Issue , 2012, Pages 139-155

  Dueñas, Pilar Mur ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

English for academic purposes (EAP); English for research publication purposes (ERPP); Intercultural rhetoric; Research article; Scholarly writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867609586     PISSN: 11397241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Belcher, D. (2007). "Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world". Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 1-22.
2. Bellés-Fortuño, B. & M. Querol-Julián (2010). "Evaluation in research article writing: A crosscultural study between Spanish and English medical discourse" in R. Lore ́s-Sanz, P. Mur- Dueñas & E. Lafuente-Milla ́n (eds.), 83-98.
3. Bornmann, L., C. Wymuth & H.D. Daniel (2010). "A content analysis of referees' comments: How do comments on manuscripts rejected by a highimpact journal and later published in either a lowor high-impact journal differ?" Scientometrics 83: 493-506.
4. Burgess, S. (2002). "Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical strategies" in J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse, 196-225. London: Longman.
5. Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003). "Shapers of published NNS research articles". Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 223-243.
6. Canagarajah, A.S. (1996). "'Nondiscursive'" requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and politics of knowledge production". Written Communication 13: 435-473.
7. Cargill, M. & P. O'Connor (2006). "Getting research published in English: Towards a curriculum design model for developing skills and enhancing outcomes". Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 53: 79-9.
8. Cargill, M. & S. Burgess (2008). "Introduction to the special issue: English for research publication purposes". Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 75-138.
9. Curry, M.J. & T. Lillis (2004). "Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands and rewards". TESOL Quarterly 38: 663-688.
10. Englander, K. (2006). "Revision of scientific manuscripts by nonnative English-speaking scientists in response to journal editors' criticism of the language". Journal of Applied Linguistics 3: 129-161.
11. Ferguson, G., C. Pérez-Llantada & R. Plo (2011). "English as an international language of communication: A study of attitudes". World Englishes 30: 41-59.
12. Fernández Polo, F. & M. Cal Varela (2009). "English for research purposes at the University of Santiago de Compostela: A survey". Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8: 152-164.
13. Flowerdew, J. (1999). "Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong". Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 243-264.
14. Flowerdew, J. (2000). "Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative- English-speaking scholars". TESOL Quarterly 34: 127-150.
15. Gosden, H. (2003). "'Why not give us the full story?': Functions of referees' comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers". Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 87-101.
16. Hewings, M. (2006). "English language standards in academic articles: Attitudes of peer reviewers". Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 53: 47-62.
17. Hyland, K. & G. Diani (eds.) (2009). Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
18. Kachru, B. (ed.) (1992). The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19. Kourilova, M. (1998). "Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientific papers written by non-native users of English". Endocrine Regulations 32: 107-114.
20. Li, Y. & J. Flowerdew (2007). "Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication". Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 100-117.
21. Lillis, T. (2008). "Ethnography as method, methodology, and 'deep theorizing': Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research". Written Communication 25: 353-388.
22. Lillis, T. & M.J. Curry (2006a). "Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interaction with literacy brokers in the production of English medium texts". Written Communication 23: 3-35.
23. Lillis, T. & M.J. Curry (2006b). "Reframing notions of competence in scholarly writing: From individual to networked activity". Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 53: 63-78.
24. Lillis, T. & M.J. Curry (2010). Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge.
25. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2006). "'I will argue that': First person pronouns as metadiscoursal devices in research article abstracts in English and Spanish". ESP Across Cultures 3: 23-40.
26. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2009a). "Different worlds, different audiences: A contrastive analysis of research article abstracts" in E. Suomela Salmi & F. Drevin (eds.), Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse, 187-197. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2009b). "(Non-) critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: A cross-cultural study of evaluation" in K. Hyland & G. Diani (eds.), 143-160.
28. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas & E. Lafuente-Millán (eds.) (2010). Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
29. Martín Martín, P. (2003). "A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences". English for Specific Purposes 22: 25-43.
30. Martín Martín, P. (2005). The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse: A Cross-cultural Genre-analytic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang.
31. Martín Martín, P. & S. Burgess (2004). "The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article abstracts". Text 24: 171-195.
32. Moreno, A.I. (2010). "Researching into English for research publication purposes from an applied intercultural perspective" in M.F. Ruiz-Garrido, J.C. Palmer-Silveira & I. Fortanet-Go ́mez (eds.), 57-71.
33. Moreno, A.I. & L. Suárez (2008). "A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews". Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 15-26.
34. Moreno, A.I. & L. Suárez (2009). "Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: Critical comments and rhetorical structure" in K. Hyland & G. Diani (eds.), 161-178.
35. Moreno, A. I. & L. Suárez (2010). "Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: "is giving reasons for critical comments" a universal politeness strategy?" in R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas & E. Lafuente-Millán (eds.), 137-160.
36. Mungra, P. & P. Webber (2010) "Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments". English for Specific Purposes 29: 43-53.
37. Mur Dueñas, P. (2007). "'I/we focus on...': A crosscultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles". Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6: 143-162.
38. Mur Dueñas, P. (2009). "Logical markers in L1 (Spanish and English) and L2 (English) Business research articles". English Text Construction 2: 246-264.
39. Mur Dueñas, P. (2010). "Attitude markers in business management research articles: A crosscultural corpus-driven approach". International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19: 50-72.
40. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010a). "The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published academic writing: issues of culture and language". Nordic Journal of English Studies 9: 41-68.
41. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010b). "Researching into English for research publication purposes from an applied intercultural perspective" in M. F. Ruiz- Garrido, J.C. Palmer-Silveira & I. Fortanet-Gómez (eds.), 25-41.
42. Pérez-Llantada, C., R. Plo & G. Ferguson (2010). "'You don't say what you know, only what you can': The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academic regarding research dissemination in English". English for Specific Purposes 30: 18-30.
43. Ruiz-Garrido, M.F., J.C. Palmer-Silveira & I. Fortanet-Gómez (eds.) (2010). English for Professional and Academic Purposes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
44. Sengupta, S. (2003). "Developing and evaluating a web-based resource for writing research articles". Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28: 489-504.
45. Shashok, K. (2001). "Author's editors: Facilitators of science information transfer". Learned Publishing 14: 113-121.
46. Shashok, K. (2008). "Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?" BMC Medical Research Methodology 8: 3-11.
47. Suárez, L. & A.I. Moreno (2008). "The rhetorical structure of literary academic book reviews: An English-Spanish cross-linguistic approach" in U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (eds.), Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, 147-168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.