|
Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 333-338
|
Utility of random cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage in a low-risk population
|
Author keywords
colposcopy; endocervical curettage; random biopsy
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER PATIENT;
CANCER SURGERY;
CAUTERIZATION;
CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA 3;
CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA 3+;
COLPOSCOPY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CURETTAGE;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD;
ENDOCERVICAL CURETTAGE;
FEMALE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
LOOP ELECTROCAUTERY EXCISION PROCEDURE;
LOW RISK POPULATION;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW;
PREVALENCE;
RISK FACTOR;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TUMOR VOLUME;
UTERINE CERVIX;
UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY;
UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;
UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;
UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;
UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
BIOPSY;
CALIFORNIA;
CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
CURETTAGE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 84867583326
PISSN: 10892591
EISSN: 15260976
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182480c18 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (43)
|
References (6)
|