Using reflection triggers while learning in an online course

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1030-1040

  Verpoorten, Dominique ^a   Westera, Wim ^a   Specht, Marcus ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROACHES TO LEARNING; CONTROL GROUPS; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; ONLINE COURSE;

TEACHING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84867578529     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01257.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., &, Mengelkamp, C., (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 4, 829-835.
2. Boud, D., Keogh, R., &, Walker, D., (1985). Reflection: turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
3. Brockbank, A., &, McGill, I., (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
4. Brown, K., &, Ryan, R., (2003). The benefits of being present: the role of mindfulness in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848.
5. Butler, D. L., &, Winne, P. H., (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
6. Cacioppo, J., &, Petty, R., (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1, 116-131.
7. Chi, M., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., &, Lavancher, C., (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 3, 439-477.
8. Chiazzese, G., Ottaviano, S., Merlo, G., Chiari, A., Allegra, M., &, Seta, L., (2006). Surfing hypertexts with a metacognition tool. Informatica, 30, 439-445.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
10. European Commission (2006). Proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key competences for lifelong learninga-COM(2005)548 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/keyrec-en.pdf.
11. Glahn, C., Specht, M., &, Koper, R., (2007). Smart indicators on learning interactions. In, E. Duval, R. Klamma, &, M. Wolpers, (Eds), EC-TEL 2007 LNCS 4753 (pp. 56-70). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
12. Hattie, J., (2008). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
13. Hoffman, B., &, Spatariu, A., (2008). The influence of self-efficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 4, 875-893.
14. Johnson, M., &, Sherlock, D., (2008). Personal transparency and self-analytic tools for online habits. In, R. Koper, K. Stefanov, &, D. Dicheva, (Eds), Stimulating Personal Development and Knowledge Sharing. Proceedings of the TENCompetence International Workshop, Sofia, Bulgaria, October 30-31, 2008 (pp. 30-38). Retrieved October 31, 2011, from http://dspace.learningnetworks.org/handle/1820/1961
15. Marzano, R. J., (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
16. Moon, J., (1999). Learning journals: a handbook for academics, students and professional development. London: Kogan Page.
17. Nielsen, J., (2010). Jakob Nielsen's Website. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://www.useit.com
18. Papadopoulos, P., Demetriadis, S., Stamelos, I., &, Tsoukalas, I., (2009). Prompting students' context-generating cognitive activity in ill-structured domains: does the prompting mode affect learning? Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 2, 193-210.
19. Schön, D., (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
20. Schraw, G., &, Dennison, R., (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
21. Sweller, J., (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
22. Taylor, P., &, Maor, D., (2000). Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey. In, A. Herrmann, &, M. Kulski, (Eds), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, February 2-4, 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/taylor.html
23. Thompson, C., (2009). Metacognitive Strategies of Teaching and Learning in Introductory Psychology Classes. Paper presented at the 3rd National Conference on Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at Liberal Arts Colleges.
24. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J., &, van Gog, T., (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a Web-based learning environment: effects on students' self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551-567.
25. Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., &, Specht, M., (2011). Infusing reflective practice in eLearning coursesa-can widgets help? International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 1, 93-109.
26. Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., &, Specht, M., (2011). Reflection amplifiers in online courses: a classification framework. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22, 2, 167-190.
27. Wang, M., Haertel, G., &, Walberg, H., (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 30-43.
28. Watkins, C., (2001). Learning about learning enhances performance. London: Institute of Education, University of London.