Assessment for active living: Harnessing the power of data-driven planning and action

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 5 SUPPL.4, 2012, Pages

  Bors, Philip A ^a   Brownson, Ross C ^b,c   Brennan, Laura K ^d  

^a IL   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d Transtria LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY LIVING; COMMUNITY PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL AUDIT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PLANNING; SAFETY; SCREENING; WALKING;

CITY PLANNING; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; DATA COLLECTION; EXERCISE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84867566693     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Community assessment guide book: North Carolina Community Health Assessment Process 2002 Raleigh NC
2. J. Wright, R. Williams, J.R. Wilkinson Development and importance of health needs assessment BMJ 316 7140 1998 1310 1313
3. E. Eng, K. Strazza-Moore, S.D. Rhodes Insiders and outsiders assess who is "the community." B.A. Israel, E. Eng, A.J. Schulz, E.A. Parker, Methods in community-based participatory research for health 2005 Jossey-Bass San Francisco CA
4. R.C. Brownson, E.A. Baker, T.L. Leet, K.N. Gillespie, W.R. True Evidence-based public health 2nd ed. 2011 Oxford University Press New York
5. R.C. Brownson, J.E. Fielding, C.M. Maylahn Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice Annu Rev Public Health 30 2009 175 201
6. N. Thompson, M. Kegler, D. Holtgrave Program evaluation R. Crosby, R. DiClemente, L. Salazar, Research methods in health promotion 2006 Jossey-Bass San Francisco CA 199 225
7. A.H. Mokdad The Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System: past, present, and future Annu Rev Public Health 30 2009 43 54
8. U.S. Dept of Commerce U.S. Census Bureau www.census.gov/ 2010
9. N.K. Denzin The research act in sociology 1970 Butterworth London, UK
10. A. Steckler, K.R. McLeroy, R.M. Goodman, S.T. Bird, L. McCormick Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction Health Educ Q 19 1 1992 1 8
11. J. Greene, L. Benjamin, L. Goodyear The merits of mixing methods in evaluation Evaluation 7 1 2001 25 44
12. Active Living by Design Active Living by Design: increasing physical activity and healthy eating through community design www.activelivingbydesign. org/
13. J.B. Bussel, L.C. Leviton, C.T. Orleans Active Living by Design: perspectives from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Am J Prev Med 37 6S2 2009 S309 S312
14. P. Bors, M. Dessauer, R. Bell, R. Wilkerson, J. Lee, S.L. Strunk The Active Living by Design national program: community initiatives and lessons learned Am J Prev Med 37 6S2 2009 S313 S321
15. L. Brennan, L. Linton, S. Strunk, J. Schilling, L. Leviton Active Living by Design: best practices from the field Am J Prev Med 37 6S2 2009
16. L.K. Brennan, R.C. Brownson, P. Hovmand Evaluation of Active Living by Design: implementation patterns across communities Am J Prev Med 43 5S4 2012 S351 S366
17. R.C. Brownson, L.K. Brennan, K.R. Evenson, L.C. Leviton Lessons from a mixed-methods approach to evaluating Active Living by Design Am J Prev Med 43 5S4 2012 S271 S280
18. P. Bors Capturing community change: Active Living by Design's progress reporting system Am J Prev Med 43 5S4 2012 S281 S289
19. K. Charmaz The grounded theory method: an implication and interpretation 1983 Little, Brown Boston MA
20. M.Q. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods 3rd ed. 2002 Sage Thousand Oaks CA
21. Atlas.ti - the knowledge workbench atlas.ti ver 5.5 www.atlasti.net/ index.html