Acute and mid-term outcomes of transvenous implant of a new left ventricular quadripolar lead versus bipolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results from a single-center prospective database

Cardiology Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 470-478

  Arias, Miguel A ^a   Pachón, Marta ^a   Puchol, Alberto ^a   Jiménez López, Jesús ^a   Rodríguez Padial, Luis ^a  

^a HOSPITAL VIRGEN DE LA SALUD   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cardiac pacing; Cardiac resynchronization; Coronary sinus; Heart failure; Left ventricular lead

Indexed keywords

VASOACTIVE AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR LEAD; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEVICE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION DISTURBANCE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR; IMPLANTATION; ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; PHRENIC NERVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUADRIPOLAR LEAD; RADIATION DOSE;

AGED; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEVICES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPAIN; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84867539562     PISSN: 18975593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2012.0087     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Landolina M, Gasparini M, Lunati M et al. Long-term complications related to biventricular defibrillator implantation: Rate of surgical revisions and impact on survival: insights from the Italian Clinical Service Database. Circulation, 2011; 123: 2526-2535.
2. Knight BP, Desai A, Coman J, Faddis M, Yong P. Long-term retention of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44: 72-77.
3. Biffi M, Moschini C, Bertini M et al. Phrenic stimulation: A challenge for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2009; 2: 402-410.
4. Dickstein K, Bogale N, Priori S et al. The European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey. Eur Heart J, 2009; 30: 2450-2460.
5. Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, Molfetta AD, Santini L, Romeo F. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: Early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm, 2011; 8: 31-37.
6. Mehta PA, Shetty AK, Squirrel M, Bostock J, Rinaldi CA. Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: Follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2012; 33: 43-49.
7. Shetty AK, Duckett SG, Bostock J et al. Initial single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2011; 34: 484-489.
8. Sperzel J, Danschel W, Gutleben KJ et al. First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead. Europace, 2012; 14: 365-372.
9. Shetty AK, Duckett SG, Bostock J, Rosenthal E, Rinaldi CA. Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace, 2011; 13: 992-996.
10. Burri H, Gerritse B, Davenport L, Demas M, Sticherling C. Fluctuation of left ventricular thresholds and required safety margin for left ventricular pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace, 2009; 11: 931-936.
11. Singh JP, Klein HU, Huang DT et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation, 2011; 123: 1159-1166.