Media ionic strength impacts embryonic responses to engineered nanoparticle exposure

Nanotoxicology

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 691-699

  Truong, Lisa ^a,b   Zaikova, Tatiana ^b,c   Richman, Erik K ^b,c   Hutchison, James E ^b,c   Tanguay, Robert L ^a,b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Safer Nanomaterials and Nanomanufacturing Initiative   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Danio rerio; Ion concentration; Nanomaterialbiological interactions; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

GOLD NANOPARTICLE;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; IN VIVO STUDY; IONIC STRENGTH; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ZEBRA FISH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CHORION; CULTURE MEDIA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GOLD; METAL NANOPARTICLES; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84867529651     PISSN: 17435390     EISSN: 17435404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2011.604440     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bar-Ilan O, Albrecht RM, Fako VE, Furgeson DY. 2009. Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Small 5:1897-1910.
2. Bowman TV, Zon LI. 2010. Swimming into the Future of Drug Discovery: In Vivo Chemical Screens in Zebrafish. ACS Chemical Biology 5:159-161.
3. Elimelech M, Omelia CR. 1990. Effect of Electrolyte Type on the Electrophoretic Mobility of Polystyrene Latex Colloids. Colloids and Surfaces 44:165-178.
4. Furgeson D, Fako V. 2009. Zebrafish as a correlative and predictive model for assessing biomaterial nanotoxicity. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 61:478-486.
5. Harper SL, Dahl JA, Maddux BLS, Tanguay RL, Hutchison JE. 2008. Proactively designing nanomaterials to enhance performance and minimise hazard. International Journal of Nanotechnology 5:124-142.
6. Harper SL, Carriere J, Miller J, Hutchison JE, Maddux BLS, Tanguay RL. In press. Systematic Evaluation of Nanomaterials Toxicity: Utility of Standarized Materials and Rapid Assays. In press
7. Jin X, Li M, Wang J, Marambio-Jones C, Peng F, Huang X, et al. 2010. High-Throughput Screening of Silver Nanoparticle Stability and Bacterial Inactivation in Aquatic Media: Influence of Specific Ions. Environmental Science & Technology 44:7321-7328.
8. Jiang W, Kim BYS, Rutka JT, Chan WCW. 2008. Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nature Nanotechnology. 3: 145-150.
9. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. 1995. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203:253-310.
10. Lee KJ, Nallathamby PD, Browning LM, Osgood CJ, Xu XH. 2007. In vivo imaging of transport and biocompatibility of single silver nanoparticles in early development of zebrafish embryos. ACS Nano 1:133-43.
11. Liu J, Aruguete DM, Murayama M, Hochella MF. 2009. Influence of Size and Aggregation on the Reactivity of an Environmentally and Industrially Relevant Manomaterial (PbS). Environmental Science & Technology 43:8178-8183.
12. Li X, Lenhart JJ, Walker HW. 2010. Dissolution-Accompanied Aggregation Kinetics of Silver Nanoparticles. Langmuir 26:16690-16698.
13. Liu W, Wu Y, Wang C, Li H, Wang T, Liao C, et al. 2010. Impact of silver nanoparticles on human cells: Effect of particle size. Nanotoxicology 4:319-330.
14. Lawrence C. 2007. The husbandry of zebrafish (Danio rerio): A review. Aquaculture 269:1-20.
15. Murdock RC, Braydich-Stolle L, Schrand AM, Schlager JJ, Hussain SM. 2008. Characterization of nanomaterial dispersion in solution prior to In vitro exposure using dynamic light scattering technique. Toxicological Sciences 101:239-253.
16. Olenin AY, Krutyakov YA, Kudrinskii AA, Lisichkin GV. 2008. Formation of surface layers on silver nanoparticles in aqueous and waterorganic media. Colloid Journal 70:71-76.
17. Pan Y, Neuss S, Leifert A, Fischler M, Wen F, Simon U, et al. 2007. Size-Dependent Cytotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles. Small 3: 1941-1949.
18. Paigen K. 2003. One hundred years of mouse genetics: An intellectual history. I. The classical period (1902-1980). Genetics, 163:1-7.
19. Parng C. 2005. In vivo zebrafish assays for toxicity testing. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel, 8:100-6.
20. Rubinstein AL. 2003. Zebrafish: From disease modeling to drug discovery. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 6:218-23.
21. Ryman-Rasmussen JP, Riviere JE, Monteiro-Riviere NA. 2007. Surface coatings determine cytotoxicity and irritation potential of quantum dot nanoparticles in epidermal keratinocytes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 127:143-153.
22. Sawant MS, Zhang S, Li L. 2001. Effect of salinity on development of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Current Science 81:1347-1350.
23. Saleh N, Kim H-J, Phenrat T, Matyjaszewski K, Tilton RD, Lowry GV. 2008. Ionic Strength and Composition Affect the Mobility of Surface-Modified Fe0 Nanoparticles in Water- Saturated Sand Columns. Environmental Science & Technology, 42:3349-3355.
24. Sayes CM, Warheit DB. 2009. Characterization of nanomaterials for toxicity assessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 1:660-670.
25. Tolaymat TM, El Badawy AM, Genaidy A, Scheckel KG, Luxton TP, Suidan M. 2008. An evidence-based environmental perspective of manufactured silver nanoparticle in syntheses and applications: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed scientific papers. Science of the Total Environment, 408:999-1006.
26. Truong L, et al. (n.d). Surface Functionalities of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) Impact Gene Expression in the Developing Zebrafish. Submitted
27. Truong L, Moody I, Stankus D, Nason J, Lonergan M, Tanguay R. 2010. Differential stability of lead sulfide nanoparticles influences biological responses in embryonic zebrafish. Archives of Toxicology 1-12.
28. Usenko CY, Harper SL, Tanguay RL. 2007. In vivo evaluation of carbon fullerene toxicity using embryonic zebrafish. Carbon N Y 45: 1891-1898.
29. Uliano E, Cataldi M, Carella F, Migliaccio O, Iaccarino D, Agnisola C. 2010. Effects of acute changes in salinity and temperature on routine metabolism and nitrogen excretion in gambusia (Gambusia affinis) and zebrafish (Danio rerio). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 157:283-290.
30. Woehrle GH, Brown LO, Hutchison JE. 2005. Thiol-functionalized, 1.5- nm gold nanoparticles through ligand exchange reactions: Scope and mechanism of ligand exchange. Journal of the American Chemical Society 127:2172-2183.
31. Westerfield M. 2000. The Zebrafish Book, ed. U.o.O.Press.
32. Eugene, OR. Waters KM, Masiello LM, Zangar RC, Karin NJ, Quesenberry RD, Bandyopadhyay S, et al. 2009. Macrophage Responses to Silica Nanoparticles are Highly Conserved Across Particle Sizes. Toxicological Sciences 107:553-569.
33. Xie B, Xu Z, Guo W, Li Q. 2008. Impact of Natural Organic Matter on the Physicochemical Properties of Aqueous C60 Nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology 42:2853-2859.
34. Yang LX, Ho NY, Alshut R, Legradi J, Weiss C, Reischl M, et al. 2009. Zebrafish embryos as models for embryotoxic and teratological effects of chemicals. Reproductive Toxicology 28:245-253.
35. Ying E, Hwang H-M. 2010. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles with different coatings and different sizes in A3 human T lymphocytes. Science of the Total Environment 408:4475-4481.