-
1
-
-
25144437863
-
An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment
-
Bauer K. An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib magazine. 2005;11(9):1.
-
(2005)
D-Lib magazine.
, vol.11
, Issue.9
, pp. 1
-
-
Bauer, K.1
-
2
-
-
38949137710
-
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses
-
Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338-42.
-
(2008)
FASEB J.
, vol.22
, Issue.2
, pp. 338-342
-
-
Falagas, M.E.1
Pitsouni, E.I.2
Malietzis, G.A.3
Pappas, G.4
-
3
-
-
38949115002
-
Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines
-
Kousha K, Thelwall M. Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics. 2008;74(2):273-94.
-
(2008)
Scientometrics.
, vol.74
, Issue.2
, pp. 273-294
-
-
Kousha, K.1
Thelwall, M.2
-
5
-
-
33746910186
-
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
-
Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;3:7.
-
(2006)
Biomed Digit Libr.
, vol.3
, pp. 7
-
-
Bakkalbasi, N.1
Bauer, K.2
Glover, J.3
Wang, L.4
-
6
-
-
77956614648
-
A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university
-
Vieira ES, Gomes JANF. A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics. 2009;81(2):587-600.
-
(2009)
Scientometrics.
, vol.81
, Issue.2
, pp. 587-600
-
-
Vieira, E.S.1
Gomes, J.A.N.F.2
-
7
-
-
84902080577
-
Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google's Scholar service
-
Pauly D, Stergiou KI. Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google's Scholar service. Ethics Sci Environ Polit. 2005;2005:33-5.
-
(2005)
Ethics Sci Environ Polit.
, vol.2005
, pp. 33-35
-
-
Pauly, D.1
Stergiou, K.I.2
-
8
-
-
34147132743
-
Life and times of the impact factor: Retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views
-
Chew M, Villanueva EV, Van Der Weyden MB. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. J R Soc Med. 2007;100(3):142-50.
-
(2007)
J R Soc Med.
, vol.100
, Issue.3
, pp. 142-150
-
-
Chew, M.1
Villanueva, E.V.2
van der Weyden, M.B.3
-
9
-
-
80054780299
-
The expansion of a measure: What is a scientific journal impact factor and how important is it for academic Brazilian dermatologists
-
Bagatin E, Gontijo B. The expansion of a measure: what is a scientific journal impact factor and how important is it for academic Brazilian dermatologists. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50(11):1432-4.
-
(2011)
Int J Dermatol.
, vol.50
, Issue.11
, pp. 1432-1434
-
-
Bagatin, E.1
Gontijo, B.2
-
10
-
-
0033560754
-
Impact factors: Use and abuse in biomedical research
-
Coleman R. Impact factors: use and abuse in biomedical research. Anat Rec. 1999;257(2):54-7.
-
(1999)
Anat Rec.
, vol.257
, Issue.2
, pp. 54-57
-
-
Coleman, R.1
-
11
-
-
29944438252
-
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
-
Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90-3.
-
(2006)
JAMA.
, vol.295
, Issue.1
, pp. 90-93
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
12
-
-
38949142376
-
Which h-index?-A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
-
Bar-Ilan J. Which h-index?-A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics. 2008;74(2):257-71.
-
(2008)
Scientometrics.
, vol.74
, Issue.2
, pp. 257-271
-
-
Bar-Ilan, J.1
-
13
-
-
0015493305
-
Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation
-
Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060):471-9.
-
(1972)
Science.
, vol.178
, Issue.4060
, pp. 471-479
-
-
Garfield, E.1
|