How to Evaluate Teaching American History Projects

The Teaching American History Project: Lessons for History Educators and Historians

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 265-282

  Lai, Emily ^a   Kearney, Julie ^a   Yarbrough, Donald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867512867     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203878200-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Alkin, M. C. (2004). Context-adapted utilization: A personal journey. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 293-303). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Alkin M. C., Christie, C. A., and Rose, M. (2006). Communicating evaluation. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, and M. M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 384-403). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. American Evaluation Association (AEA). (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp
4. Bickman, L. (2000). Summing up program theory. In P. J. Rogers, T. A. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, and T. A. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities [Special issue]. New Directions for Evaluation, 87(3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Brown, A., and Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Caracelli, V. J., and Greene, J. C. (1997). Craft ing mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene and V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms [Special issue]. New Directions for Evaluation, 74(2).
7. Chen, H-T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Chen, H-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Davidson, E. J. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., and Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112.
12. Donaldson, S. I. (2003). Theory-driven program evaluation in the new millennium. In S. I. Donaldson and M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 109-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Donaldson, S. I. (2007). Program theory-driven evaluation science: Strategies and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. DuFour, R. (2004, March 1). The best staffdevelopment is in the workplace, not in the workshop. Journal of StaffDevelopment, 25(2), 63-64.
15. Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
16. Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., and Worthen, B. R. (Eds.). (2004). Program evaluation (3rd ed.). Boston:Pearson Education.
17. Gaynor, A. K. (1998). Analyzing problems in schools and school systems: A theoretical approach.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (JCSEE). (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (JCSEE). (in press). The program evaluation standards (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. W. W. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, Michigan, W. W.
21. Kellog Foundation. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf
22. Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., and Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Oosterhof, A. (1999). Developing and using classroom assessments. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
25. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Project Management Institute. (2000). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. New York: Author.
27. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., and Lipsey, M. W. (1998). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental design.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2001). The metaevaluation imperative. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 183-209.
33. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2004). The 21st-century CIPP model: Origins, development, and use. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 245-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Verzuh, E. (1999). The fast forward MBA in project management. New York: Wiley.
35. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Weiss, C. H. (2000). Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? In P. J. Rogers, T. A. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, and T. A. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities. New Direction for Evaluation, 87(3).
37. Wilson, S. M., and Wineburg, S. (1988). Peer at history from different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in the Teaching of American History. Teachers College Record, 89, 525-539.
38. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.