An alternate method of deriving priorities and related inferences for group decision making in analytic hierarchy process

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 5-6, 2011, Pages 279-287

  Basak, Indrani ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggregated priority weight; Dependence of judgements; Equality of two priority vectors; Maximum likelihood estimate; Rank order

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867489555     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mcda.484     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arbel, A., 1989. Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation. European Journal of Operational Research 43: 317-326.
2. Basak, I., 1989. Estimation of the multi-criteria worths of the alternatives in a hierarchical structure of comparisons. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 18: 3719-3738.
3. Basak, I., 1991. Inference in pairwise comparison experiments based on ratio scales. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 35: 80-91.
4. Basak, I., 1998. Probabilistic judgments specified partially in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 108: 153-164.
5. Bozoki, S., Fulop, J., Ronyai, L., 2010. On optimal completions of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 52: 318-333.
6. Bryson, N., Joseph, A., 2000. Generating consensus priority interval vectors for group decision-making in the AHP. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 9: 127-137.
7. Crawford, G., Williams, C., 1985. A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29: 387-405.
8. Genest, C., Rivest, LP., 1994. A statistical look at Saaty’s method of estimating pairwise preferences expressed on a ratio scale. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 38: 477-496.
9. Hahn, ED., 2003. Decision making with uncertain judgments: a stochastic formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Sciences 34: 443-466.
10. Haines, LM., 1998. A statistical approach to the Analytic Hierarchy Process with interval judgments. (I). Distributions on feasible regions. European Journal of Operational Research 110: 112-125.
11. Jensen, RE., 1984. An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 28: 317-332.
12. de Jong, P., 1984. A statistical approach to Saaty’s scaling method for priorities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 28: 467-478.
13. Lin, CC., 2007. A revised framework for deriving priority values from pairwise comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research 176: 1145-1150.
14. Nedashkovskaya, NI., 2010. Multiple-criteria decision making under incomplete expert judgements using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Dempster-Shafer theory. Journal of the Mykholaiv Petro Mogyla State University: Computer Technologies Series 143: 6-14.
15. Ramanathan, R., 1997. Stochastic decision making using multiplicative AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 97: 543-549.
16. Saaty, TL., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
17. Saaty, TL., Vargas, LG., 1987. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 32: 107-117.
18. Stam, A., Duarte Silva, AP., 2003. On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 145: 92-108.
19. Sugihara, K., Ishii, H., Tanaka, H., 2004. Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 158: 745-754.