Vascular complications in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery after fibrinolysis with tenecteplase: Registry of 199 patients;Complicações vasculares em pacientes submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea precoce por via femoral após fibrinólise com tenecteplase: Registro de 199 pacientes

Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Gomes Junior, Manuel Pereira Marques ^a   Falcão, Felipe José de Andrade ^a   Alves, Cláudia Maria Rodrigues ^a   de Sousa, José Marconi Almeida ^a   Herrmann, João Lourenço ^a   Moreno, Antonio Celio Camargo ^a   de Oliveira, Carlos Alexandre Lemes ^a   de Matos, Livia Nascimento ^b   Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira ^c   Carvalho, Antonio Carlos ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Serviço de Atendimento Móvel de Urgências SAMU   (Brazil)

^c Rede Estadual de Educação de São Paulo REESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Fibrinolysis; Hemorrhage; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

TENECTEPLASE;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; DRUG SAFETY; EARLY INTERVENTION; FEMORAL ARTERY; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INGUINAL HEMATOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA; SIDE EFFECT; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84867488014     PISSN: 01041843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343(8893):311-22.
2. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003; 361(9351):13-20.
3. Matte BS, Bergoli LCC, Balvedi JA, Zago AC. Perfil da intervenção coronária percutânea no infarto agudo do miocárdio com supradesnivelamento do segmento ST no Brasil de 2006 a 2010: Registro CENIC. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2011; 19(2):131-7.
4. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e574-e651.
5. Ndrepepa G, Schuster T, Hadamitzky M, Byrne R, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, et al. Validation of the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition of bleeding in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2012;125(11):1424-31.
6. Steg PG, Huber K, Andreotti F, Arnesen H, Atar D, Badimon L, et al. Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(15):1854-64.
7. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bahtt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2736-47.
8. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Lundqvist CB, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep 11. [Epub ahead of print]
9. White HD. Systems of care: need for hub-hand-spoke systems for both primary and systematic percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis. Circulation. 2008;118(3):219-22.
10. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomized trials. Lancet. 2006;367(9510):579-88.
11. Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) Investigators. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2006;367(9510): 569-78.
12. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, Ducas J, Heffernan M, Cohen EA, et al.; TRANSFER-MI Trial Investigators. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(26):2705-18.
13. Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, Mielecki W, Savonitto S, Murena E, et al. Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab Reteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):559-68.
14. Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Pena G, Blanco J, Alonso-Briales J, Lopez-Mesa J, et al. Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(8):949-60.
15. Verheugt FWA, Steinhubl SR, Hamon M, Darius H, Steg PG, Valgimigli M, et al. Incidence, prognostic impact and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and non-access site bleeding in PCI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):191-7.
16. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Coll Cardiol. 2006;114(8):774-82.
17. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009;157(1):132-40.
18. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimski P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomized, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-20.
19. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai B, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (the RIFLE-STEACS study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 27. [Epub ahead of print]
20. Bertrand OF, Bélise P, Joyal D, Costerousse O, Rao SV, Jolly SS, et al. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2012; 163(4):632-48.
21. Zanatta LG, Cardoso CO, Mota FM, Conti EP, Diehl D, Rodrigues APR, et al. Preditores e incidência de complicações vasculares após a realização de intervenções coronárias percutâneas: achados do Registro IC-FUC. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2008;16(3):301-6.
22. Rao SV, Mehran R. Evaluating the bite of the BARC. Circulation. 2012;125(11):1344-6.