A prospective intervention study of colonoscopy reporting among patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 718-722

  Beaulieu, Daphnée ^a   Martel, Myriam ^a   Barkun, Alan ^a,b  

^a MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audit; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Endoscopy; Quality; Reporting; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SAFETY; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84867483754     PISSN: 08357900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/623402     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: Report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:757-66. (Pubitemid 46629071)
2. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308. (Pubitemid 34664769)
3. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63(4 Suppl):S16-28.
4. Beaulieu D, Barkun A, Martel M. A quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened for colorectal neoplasia (CRN). Can J of Gastroenterol 2010;24 (Suppl A):A62 (Abst).