Goal-oriented space-time adaptivity in the finite element Galerkin method for the computation of nonstationary incompressible flow

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 70, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1139-1166

  Besier, Michael ^a   Rannacher, Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Goal oriented adaptivity; Nonstationary incompressible flow; Space time finite elements

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVITY; DUAL PROBLEM; FINITE ELEMENT; GOAL-ORIENTED; GOAL-ORIENTED ADAPTIVITY; LOCAL ERROR; MESH ADAPTATION; NONSTATIONARY; POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATION; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; SENSITIVITY FACTORS; SPACE TIME FINITE ELEMENT; SPATIAL MESH; TEMPORAL DISCRETIZATION; TEST EXAMPLES; TIME STEP; WEIGHTED RESIDUAL METHOD;

GALERKIN METHODS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 84867471977     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2735     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Verfürth R.A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques. In Wiley-Teubner Series Advances in Numerical Mathematics. Wiley-Teubner: New York Stuttgart, 1996.
2. Eriksson K, Estep D, Hansbo P, Johnson C.Introduction to Adaptive Methods for Differential Equations. In Acta Numerica 1995, Vol. 4, Iserles A (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1995.
3. Babuška I, Strouboulis T. The Finite Element Method and Its Reliability. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 2001.
4. Bangerth W, Rannacher R. Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations. Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel Boston Berlin, 2003.
5. Kay DA, Gresho PM, Griffiths DF, Silvester DJ.Adaptive time-stepping for incompressible flow part II: Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2010; 32(1):111-128.
6. John V, Rang J.Adaptive time step control for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2010; 199(9-12):514-524.
7. Bänsch E.An adaptive finite-element strategy for the three-dimensional time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 1991; 36(1):3-28.
8. Schmich M.Adaptive finite element methods for computing nonstationary incompressible flows. PhD Thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 2009.
9. Schmich M, Vexler B.Adaptivity with dynamic meshes for space-time finite element discretizations of parabolic equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2008; 30(1):369-393.
10. Mittal S, Ratner A, Hastreiter D, Tezduyar TE.Space-time finite element computation of incompressible flows with emphasis on flows involving oscillating cylinders. International Video Journal of Engineering Research 1991; 1(1):83-96.
11. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE.Notes on the stabilized space-time finite-element formulation of unsteady incompressible flows. Computer Physics Communications 1992; 73(1-3):93-112.
12. Behr M, Tezduyar TE.Finite element solution strategies for large-scale flow simulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 112(1-4):3-24.
13. N'dri D, Garon A, Fortin A.Incompressible Navier-Stokes computations with stable and stabilized space-time formulations: a comparative study. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 18(7):495-512.
14. Hoffman J.Efficient computation of mean drag for the subcritical flow past a circular cylinder using general Galerkin G2. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2008; 59(11):1241-1258.
15. Temam R. Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. AMS Chelsea Publishing: Providence, Rhode Island, 2001.
16. Heywood JG, Rannacher R, Turek S.Artificial boundaries and flux and pressure conditions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1996; 22(5):325-352.
17. Ciarlet PG. The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, 1sted. North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam NewYork Oxford, 1987.
18. Carey GF, Oden JT. Finite Elements. Volume III. Computational Aspects. The Texas Finite Element Series, Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, 1984.
19. Eriksson K, Estep D, Hansbo P, Johnson C. Computational Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1996.
20. Hood P, Taylor C.Navier-Stokes equations using mixed interpolation. In Finite Element Methods in Flow Problems. O J T, Zienkiewicz OC, Gallagher RH, Taylor C (eds). University of Alabama: Huntsville, 1974. pp. 121-132.
21. Becker R, Braack M.A modification of the least-squares stabilization for the Stokes equations. Calcolo 2001; 38(4):173-199.
22. Becker R, Braack M.A two-level stabilization scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations. In Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications. ENUMATH 2003. Feistauer M, Dolejší V, Knobloch P, Najzar K (eds). Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 2004.
23. Franca LP, Frey SL.Stabilized finite element methods: II. The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 99(2-3):209-233.
24. Braack M, Burman E, John V, Lube G.Stabilized finite element methods for the generalized Oseen equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196(4-6):853-866.
25. Becker R, Rannacher R.An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods. In Acta Numerica 2001, Vol. 10, Iserles A (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2001. pp. 1-102.
26. Wloka J. Partielle Differentialgleichungen. B. G.Teubner: Stuttgart, 1982.
27. Griewank A.Achieving logarithmic growth of temporal and spatial complexity in reverse automatic differentiation. Optimization Methods and Software 1992; 1(1):35-54.
28. Berggren M, Glowinski R, Lions JL.A computational approach to controllability issues for flow-related models. (I): Pointwise control of the viscous Burgers equation. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1996; 7(3):237-252.
29. Walther A, Griewank A.Advantages of binomial checkpointing for memory-reduced adjoint calculations. In Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications. ENUMATH 2003, Feistauer M, Dolejší V, Knobloch P, Najzar K (eds). Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 2004; 834-843.
30. Meidner D.Adaptive space-time finite element methods for optimization problems governed by nonlinear parabolic systems. PhD Thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 2007.
31. Carstensen C, Verfürth R.Edge residuals dominate a posteriori error estimates for low order finite element methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1999; 36(5):1571-1587.
32. Becker R, Rannacher R.A feed-back approach to error control in finite element methods: basic analysis and examples. East West Journal of Numerical Mathematics 1996; 4: 237-264.
33. Braack M, Ern A.A posteriori control of modeling errors and discretization errors. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 2003; 1(2):221-238.
34. Richter T.Funktionalorientierte Gitteroptimierung bei der Finite-Elemente-Approximation elliptischer Differentialgleichungen. Diploma thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 2001.
35. Richter T.Parallel multigrid method for adaptive finite elements with application to 3D flow problems. PhD Thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 2005.
36. Schäfer M, Turek S.Benchmark computations of laminar flow around a cylinder. In Flow Simulation with High-Performance Computer II, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 52, Hirschel EH (ed.). Vieweg: Braunschweig Wiesbaden, 1996. pp. 547-566.
37. Besier M, Wollner W.On the pressure approximation in nonstationary incompressible flow simulations on dynamically varying spatial meshes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2011. DOI: 10.1002/fld.2625.
38. John V.Reference values for drag and lift of a two-dimensional time-dependent flow around a cylinder. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2004; 44(7):777-788.