Examining the effect of task stage and topic knowledge on searcher interaction with a "digital bookstore"

IIiX 2012 - Proceedings 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium: Behaviors, Interactions, Interfaces, Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 4-11

  Pharo, Nils ^a   Nordlie, Ragnar ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Information seeking; Interactive information retrieval; Relevance judgments

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SEEKING; INTERACTIVE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERACTIVE TRACKS; RELEVANCE JUDGMENT; WORK TASK;

METADATA;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84867469498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2362724.2362730     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Borlund, P. Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Abo Akademis Forlag, 2000.
2. Case, D. Looking for Information, Second Edition: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2006.
3. Ellis, D., Cox, D., and Hall, K. A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation 49, 4 (1993), 356-369.
4. Ellis, D. and Haugan, M. Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation 53, 4 (1997), 384-403.
5. Ellis, D. A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation 45, 3 (1989), 171-212.
6. Hölscher, C. and Strube, G. Searching on the Web (poster). Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '99, (1999), 305-306.
7. Hölscher, C. and Strube, G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks 33, 1-6 (2000), 337-346.
8. Ingwersen, P. and Järvelin, K. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer, 2005.
9. Järvelin, K. and Kekäläinen, J. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '00, (2000), 41-48.
10. Kuhlthau, C.C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42, 5 (1991), 361-371.
11. Kuhlthau, C.C. Seeking Meaning. Libraries Unlimited, 2003.
12. Malik, S., Tombros, A., and Larsen, B. The Interactive Track at INEX 2006. In N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas and A. Trotman, eds., Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, 387-399.
13. Marchionini, G., Dwiggins, S., Katz, A., and Lin, X. Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Library & information science research 15, 1 (1993), 35-69.
14. Marchionini, G., Lin, X., and Dwiggins, S. Effects of search and subject expertise on information seeking in a hypertext environment. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. ASIS, Silver Springs, MD, 1990, 129-142.
15. Marchionini, G. Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40, (1989), 54-66.
16. Marchionini, G. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
17. Mizzaro, S. Relevance: The whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, 9 (1997), 810-832.
18. Pharo, N., Beckers, T., Nordlie, R., and Fuhr, N. Overview of the INEX 2010 Interactive Track. In S. Geva, J. Kamps, R. Schenkel and A. Trotman, eds., Comparative Evaluation of Focused Retrieval. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, 227-235.
19. Pharo, N. and Järvelin, K. The SST method: a tool for analysing Web information search processes. Information Processing & Management 40, 4 (2004), 633-654.
20. Pharo, N. and Nordlie, R. Context Matters: An Analysis of Assessments of XML Documents. In F. Crestani and I. Ruthven, eds., Context: Nature, Impact, and Role. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2005, 1911-1912.
21. Robertson, S.E. and Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M. On the evaluation of IR systems. Information Processing & Management 28, 4 (1992), 457-466.
22. Saracevic, T. Relevance reconsidered '96. In CoLIS 2: second international conference on conceptions of library science: integration in perspective: (Copenhagen, October 13-16, 1996). Copenhagen, 1996, 201-218.
23. Serola, S. and Vakkari, P. The anticipated and assessed contribution of information types in references retrieved for preparing a research proposal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56, 4 (2005), 373-381.
24. Taylor, A., Cool, C, Belkin, N., and Amadio, W. Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion. Information Processing & Management 43, 4 (2007), 1071-1084.
25. Vakkari, P. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation 57, 1 (2001), 44-60.
26. White, R.W., Dumais, S.T., and Teevan, J. Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior. Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM '09, (2009), 132.
27. Wildemuth, B.M. The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55, 3 (2004), 246-258.
28. Wilson, T.D. Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation 55, 3 (1999), 249-270.