Can hybrid poplar plantations accelerate the restoration of forest understory attributes on abandoned fields?

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 287, Issue , 2013, Pages 77-89

  Boothroyd Roberts, Kathleen ^a   Gagnon, Daniel ^a,b,c   Truax, Benoit ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^c Eastern Townships Forest Research Trust   (Canada)

Author keywords

Afforestation; Farmland; Leaf litter; Nurse stand; Shade; Soil

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED FARMLAND; AFFORESTATION; CANOPY DEVELOPMENT; DELTOIDES; ECOLOGICAL EFFECT; FARMLAND; FOREST HABITATS; FOREST UNDERSTORY; HERBACEOUS SPECIES; HYBRID POPLAR; HYBRID POPLAR CLONES; LEAF LITTER; MULTI-FUNCTIONAL; NATIVE SPECIES; NATIVE TREES; P. BALSAMIFERA; P. NIGRA; POPULUS; QUEBEC , CANADA; SECOND-GROWTH FORESTS; SECONDARY FORESTS; SHADE; SHRUB SPECIES; SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTY; TREE SEEDLINGS; TREE SPECIES; UNDERSTORY VEGETATION; WOODLOTS;

CLONING; ECOSYSTEMS; FARMS; NURSING; REFORESTATION; RESTORATION; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS;

CONSERVATION;

AFFORESTATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; COLONIZATION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DECIDUOUS TREE; HABITAT RESTORATION; HERB; HYBRID; LEAF LITTER; PLANTATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SECONDARY FOREST; SEEDLING; SHADE TOLERANCE; SOIL MOISTURE; STAND STRUCTURE; TRANSPIRATION; UNDERSTORY; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

CLONES; CONSERVATION; FOREST LITTER; FORESTATION; MOISTURE; REFORESTATION; SHADES; SOIL;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

POPULUS; POPULUS BALSAMIFERA; POPULUS NIGRA;

EID: 84867366642     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Allen S.J., Hall R.L., Rosier P.T.W. Transpiration by two poplar varieties grown as coppice for biomass production. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19:493-501.
2. Alriksson A., Olsson M.T. Soil changes in different age classes of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on afforested farmland. Plant Soil 1995, 168-169:103-110.
3. Arevalo C.B.M., Bhatti J.S., Chang S.X., Sidders D. Land use change effects on ecosystem carbon balance: from agricultural to hybrid poplar plantation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 141:342-349.
4. Aubin I., Gachet S., Messier C., Bouchard A. How resilient are northern hardwood forests to human disturbance? An evaluation using a plant functional group approach. Ecoscience 2007, 14:259-271.
5. Aubin I., Messier C., Bouchard A. Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests?. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2461-2476.
6. Barrett L.I. Influence of forest litter on the germination and early survival of chestnut oak, Quercus montana, Willd. Ecology 1931, 12:476-484.
7. Bélanger L., Grenier M. Agriculture intensification and forest fragmentation in the St. Lawrence valley, Québec, Canada. Landsc. Ecol. 2002, 17:495-507.
8. Benjamin K., Domon G., Bouchard A. Vegetation composition and succession of abandoned farmland: Effects of ecological, historical and spatial factors. Landscape Ecology 2005, 20:627-647.
9. Binkley, D., 1995. The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns. In: Mead, D.J., Cornforth, I.S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Trees and Soils Workshop, Lincoln University 28 February - 2 March 1994. Lincoln University Press, Canterbury, pp. 1-33.
10. Bray R.H., Kurtz L.T. Determination of Total, Organic, and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils. Soil Science 1945, 59(1):39-46.
11. Brouillet, L., Coursol, F., Favreau, M., Anions, M., 2010+. VASCAN, the Database of Vascular Plants of Canada. (accessed 10.12.10). http://data.canadensys.net/vascan/.
12. Brunet J., Valtinat K., Mayr M.L., Felton A., Lindbladh M., Bruun H.H. Understory succession in post-agricultural oak forests: habitat fragmentation affects forest specialists and generalists differently. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:1863-1871.
13. Burton P.J., Bazzaz F.A. Tree seedling emergence on interactive temperature and moisture gradients and in patches of old-field vegetation. Am. J. Bot. 1991, 78:131-149.
14. Burton P.J., Bazzaz F.A. Ecophysiological responses of tree seedlings invading different patches of old-field vegetation. J. Ecol. 1995, 83:99-112.
15. Carnevale N.J., Montagnini F. Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 163:217-227.
16. Chazdon R.L. Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 2008, 320:1458-1460.
17. Chen C.R., Xu Z.H., Blumfield T.J., Hughes J.M. Soil microbial biomass during the early establishment of hoop pine plantation: seasonal variation and impacts of site preparation. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 186:213-225.
18. Coleman M.D., Isebrands J.G., Tolsted D.N., Tolbert V.R. Comparing soil carbon of short rotation poplar plantations with agricultural crops and woodlots in North Central United States. Environ. Manage. 2004, 33:S299-S308.
19. Davis M.A., Wrage K.J., Reich P.B. Competition between tree seedlings and herbaceous vegetation: support for a theory of resource supply and demand. J. Ecol. 1998, 86:652-661.
20. De Keersmaeker L., Martens L., Verheyen K., Hermy M., Schrijver A.D., Lust N. Impact of soil fertility and insolation on diversity of herbaceous woodland species colonizing afforestations in Muizen forest (Belgium). For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 188(1-3):291-304.
21. De Keersmaeker L., Vandekerkhove K., Verstraeten A., Baeten L., Verschelde P., Thomaes A., Hermy M., Verheyen K. Clear-felling effects on colonization rates of shade-tolerant forest herbs into a post-agricultural forest adjacent to ancient forest. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2011, 14(1):75-83.
22. Dölle M., Schmidt W. Impact of tree species on nutrient and light availability: evidence from a permanent plot study of old-field succession. Plant Ecol. 2009, 203:273-287.
23. Domon G., Bouchard A. The landscape history of Godmanchester (Quebec, Canada): Two centuries of shifting relationships between anthropic and biophysical factors. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:1201-1214.
24. Dufrêne M., Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 1997, 67(3):345-366.
25. Dzwonko Z., Loster S. Species richness and seed dispersal to secondary woods in southern Poland. J. Biogeogr. 1992, 19:195-204.
26. Fischer D., Hart S., Rehill B., Lindroth R., Keim P., Whitham T. Do high-tannin leaves require more roots?. Oecologia 2006, 149:668-675.
27. Flinn K.M., Vellend M. Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2005, 3:243-250.
28. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (Ed.), 1993+. Flora of North America North of Mexico, New York and Oxford.
29. Fortier J., Gagnon D., Truax B., Lambert F. Biomass and volume yield after 6 years in multiclonal hybrid poplar riparian buffer strips. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:1028-1040.
30. Fortier J., Gagnon D., Truax B., Lambert F. Nutrient accumulation and carbon sequestration in 6-year-old hybrid poplars in multiclonal agricultural riparian buffer strips. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 137:276-287.
31. Fortier J., Gagnon D., Truax B., Lambert F. Understory plant diversity and biomass in hybrid poplar riparian buffer strips in pastures. New For. 2011, 42:241-265.
32. Foster D.R. Land-use history (1730-1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J. Ecol. 1992, 80:753-771.
33. Frazer G.W., Canham C.D., Lertzman K.P. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA): Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs 1999, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York.
34. Frère Marie-Victorin é.C. Flore Laurentienne 1995, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal.
35. Gardiner E.S., Stanturf J.A., Schweitzer C.J. An afforestation system for restoring bottomland hardwood forests: biomass accumulation of nuttall oak seedlings interplanted beneath eastern cottonwood. Rest. Ecol. 2004, 12:525-532.
36. Garten C.T., Wullschleger S.D., Classen A.T. Review and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:214-226.
37. Glitzenstein J.S., Canham C.D., McDonnell M.J., Streng D.R. Effects of environment and land-use history on upland forests of the Cary Arboretum, Hudson Valley, New York. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 1990, 117:106-122.
38. Grashof-Bokdam C.J., Geertsema W. The effect of isolation and history on colonization patterns of plant species in secondary woodland. J. Biogeogr. 1998, 25:837-846.
39. Hall R.L., Allen S.J., Rosier P.T.W., Hopkins R. Transpiration from coppiced poplar and willow measured using sap-flow methods. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1998, 90:275-290.
40. Hansen E.A. Soil carbon sequestration beneath hybrid poplar plantations in the North Central United States. Biomass Bioenergy 1993, 5:431-436.
41. Hartley M.J. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155:81-95.
42. Honnay O., Hermy M., Coppin P. Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization. For. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 115:157-170.
43. Honnay O., Verheyen K., Butaye J., Jacquemyn H., Bossuyt B., Hermy M. Possible effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on the range of forest plant species. Ecol. Lett. 2002, 5:525-530.
44. Hooker T.D., Compton J.E. Forest ecosystem carbon and nitrogen accumulation during the first century after agricultural abandonment. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13:299-313.
45. Hornbeck J.W., Martin C.W., Eagar C. Summary of water yield experiments at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Can. J. For. Res. 1997, 27:2043-2052.
46. Horsley S.B. Allelopathic inhibition of black cherry by fern, grass, goldenrod, and aster. Can. J. For. Res. 1977, 7:205-216.
47. Horticulture Indigo Inc., 2011. Nos végétaux. (accessed 02.10.11). http://www.horticulture-indigo.com.
48. Humbert L., Gagnon D., Kneeshaw D., Messier C. A shade tolerance index for common understory species of northeastern North America. Ecol. Indic. 2007, 7:195-207.
49. Inouye R.S., Huntly N.J., Tilman D., Tester J.R., Stillwell M., Zinnel K.C. Old-field succession on a Minnesota sand plain. Ecology 1987, 68:12-26.
50. Jeffries S.B., Wentworth T.R., Allen H.L. Long-term effects of establishment practices on plant communities across successive rotations in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 260:1548-1556.
51. Knops J.M.H., Tilman D. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 2000, 81:88-98.
52. Laganière J., Angers D.A., Paré D. Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2010, 16:439-453.
53. Laliberté E., Bouchard A., Cogliastro A. Optimizing hardwood reforestation in old fields: the effects of treeshelters and environmental factors on tree seedling growth and physiology. Rest. Ecol. 2008, 16:270-280.
54. Le Houérou H.N. Land degradation in Mediterranean Europe: can agroforestry be a part of the solution? A prospective review. Agrofor. Syst. 1993, 21:43-61.
55. Li X., Wilson S.D. Facilitation among woody plants establishing in an old field. Ecology 1998, 79:2694-2705.
56. Lust N., Kongs T., Nachtergale L., De Keersmaeker L. Spontaneous ingrowth of tree species in poplar plantations in Flanders. Ann. For. Sci. 2001, 58:861-868.
57. Matlack G.R. Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 1994, 75:1491-1502.
58. Maycock P.F., Guzikowa M. Flora and vegetation of an old field community at Erindale, southern Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 1984, 62:2193-2207.
59. Myster R.W. Contrasting litter effects on old field tree germination and emergence. Plant Ecol. 1994, 114:169-174.
60. Myster R.W., Pickett S.T.A. Effects of litter, distance, density and vegetation patch type on postdispersal tree seed predation in old fields. Oikos 1993, 66:381-388.
61. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Wagner, H., 2011. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 1.17-11. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
62. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. (accessed 02.10.11). http://www.ontarioweeds.com.
63. Peterken G.F. Rebuilding networks of forest habitats in lowland England. Landsc. Res. 2000, 25:291-303.
64. Petzold R., Schubert B., Feger K.H. Biomass accumulation, nutrient allocation and soil ecological effects of a short-rotation poplar plantation in Saxony (Germany). Bodenkultur 2010, 61:23-35.
65. Petzold R., Schwärzel K., Feger K.H. Transpiration of a hybrid poplar plantation in Saxony (Germany) in response to climate and soil conditions. Eur. J. For. Res. 2011, 130:695-706.
66. Pickett S.T.A. Population Patterns through Twenty Years of Oldfield Succession. Plant Ecology 1982, 49(1):45-59.
67. Pons T.L. Breaking of seed dormancy by nitrate as a gap detection mechanism. Ann. Bot. 1989, 63:139-143.
68. Poulton P.R., Pye E., Hargreaves P.R., Jenkinson D.S. Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen by old arable land reverting to woodland. Glob. Change Biol. 2003, 9:942-955.
69. Poyatos R., Latron J., Llorens P. Land use and land cover change after agricultural abandonment: the case of a Mediterranean Mountain area (Catalan Pre-Pyrenees). Mt. Res. Dev. 2003, 23:362-368.
70. Richter D.D., Markewitz D., Wells C.G., Allen H.L., April R., Heine P.R., Urrego B. Soil chemical change during three decades in an old-field loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) ecosystem. Ecology 1994, 75:1463-1473.
71. Ritter E., Vesterdal L., Gundersen P. Changes in soil properties after afforestation of former intensively managed soils with oak and Norway spruce. Plant Soil 2003, 249:319-330.
72. Roura-Pascual N., Pons P., Etienne M., Lambert B. Transformation of a rural landscape in the Eastern Pyrenees between 1953 and 2000. Mt. Res. Dev. 2005, 25:252-261.
73. Sartori F., Lal R., Ebinger M.H., Eaton J.A. Changes in soil carbon and nutrient pools along a chronosequence of poplar plantations in the Columbia Plateau, Oregon, USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 122:325-339.
74. Schimel J.P., Cates R.G., Ruess R. The role of balsam poplar secondary chemicals in controlling soil nutrient dynamics through succession in the Alaskan taiga. Biogeochemistry 1998, 42:221-234.
75. Singleton R., Gardescu S., Marks P.L., Geber M.A. Forest herb colonization of postagricultural forests in central New York State, USA. J. Ecol. 2001, 89:325-338.
76. Soo T., Tullus A., Tullus H., Roosaluste E. Floristic diversity responses in young hybrid aspen plantations to land-use history and site preparation treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:858-867.
77. Stephens S.S., Wagner M.R. Forest plantations and biodiversity: a fresh perspective. J. For. 2007, 105:307-313.
78. The Nature Conservancy, 1988. Element Stewardship Abstract for Anthoxanthum odoratum. (accessed 02.10.11). http://conserveonline.org/library/anthodo.PDF.
79. Thomaes A., De Keersmaeker L., De Schrijver A., Vandekerkhove K., Verschelde P., Verheyen K. Can tree species choice influence recruitment of ancient forest species in post-agricultural forest?. Plant Ecology 2011, 212(4):573-584.
80. Thomaes A., De Keersmaeker L., Van Calster H., De Schrijver A., Vandekerkhove K., Verstraeten G., Verheyen K. Diverging effects of two contrasting tree species on soil and herb layer development in a chronosequence of post-agricultural forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 278:90-100.
81. Thomas S.C., Halpern C.B., Falk D.A., Liguori D.A., Austin K.A. Plant diversity in managed forests: understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:864-879.
82. Thorne J.F., Hamburg S.P. Nitrification potentials of an old-field chronosequence in Campton, New Hampshire. Ecology 1985, 66:1333-1338.
83. Tilman D. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:827-852.
84. Truax B., Lambert F., Gagnon D. Herbicide-free plantations of oaks and ashes along a gradient of open to forested mesic environments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 137:155-169.
85. Truax B., Gagnon D., Fortier J., Lambert F. Yield in 8 year-old hybrid poplar plantations on abandoned farmland along climatic and soil fertility gradients. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 267:228-239.
86. USDA NRCS, 2011. The PLANTS Database, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Plant Data Team. (accessed 02.10.11). http://plants.usda.gov.
87. Vankat A.J.L., Carson W.P. Floristics of a chronosequence corresponding to old field-deciduous forest succession in Southwestern Ohio. III. Post-disturbance vegetation. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 1991, 118:385-391.
88. Vitousek P.M., Andariese S.W., Matson P.A., Morris L., Sanford R.L. Effects of harvest intensity, site preparation, and herbicide use on soil nitrogen transformations in a young loblolly pine plantation. For. Ecol. Manage. 1992, 49:277-292.
89. Wright J.P., Fridley J.D. Biogeographic synthesis of secondary succession rates in eastern North America. J. Biogeogr. 2010, 37:1584-1596.