Evaluation of four time-saving methods of reading capsule endoscopy videos

European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1276-1280

  Kyriakos, Nikolaos ^a,d   Karagiannis, Stefanos ^a   Galanis, Petros ^a   Liatsos, Christos ^a,d   Zouboulis Vafiadis, Irini ^c   Georgiou, Evangelos ^b   Mavrogiannis, Christos ^a  

^a Faculty of Nursing   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

^c LAIKO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^d 401 GENERAL MILITARY HOSPITAL OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Detection rate; Reading time; Small bowel; Wireless capsule endoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUTOMATIC MODE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CELIAC DISEASE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANUAL MODE; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES, PARAMETERS AND DEVICES; QUICKVIEW MODE; READING; REVIEW; SPEED UP MODE; TIME PERCEPTION; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84867332862     PISSN: 0954691X     EISSN: 14735687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835718d2     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Delvaux M, Gerard G. Capsule endoscopy in 2005: facts and perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20:23-39. (Pubitemid 43210625)
2. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology status evaluation report: wireless capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:539-545.
3. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61:503-505.
4. Daperno M, D'Haens G, Van Assche G, Baert F, Bulois P, Maunoury V, et al. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:505-512. (Pubitemid 39311530)
5. Sim J, Wright C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther2005; 85:257-268. (Pubitemid 40333545)
6. Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992; 304:1491-1494.
7. Wolff JH, Uradomo LT, Goldberg EM. Wireless capsule endoscopy practice makes perfect? A survey of capsule endoscopy viewing practices in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69:AB201.
8. Appalaneni V, Glenn T, Hoffman BJ. Video capsule endoscopy: accuracy of Quick-view [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:AB313.
9. Diaz AP, Viso LM, Asanza CG, Arregui EC, Fernandez-Pacheco PM. Evaluation of Quickview system and suspected blood indicator test from Given M2A plus capsule endoscopy software in the clinical setting [abstract]. GastrointestEndosc 2006; 63:AB227.
10. Smelkin I. Rapid4 Quickview V4 has 100% negative and positive predictive values [abstract]. 5th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy; 6-7 March 2006; Boca Raton, Florida.
11. Ponferrada A, Menchen L, Gonzalez AC, Cos E, Menchen P. Quickview(g) system and Suspected Blood Indicator(g) test are a useful tool in the clinical setting [abstract]. 5th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy; 9-10 June 2006; Paris.
12. Schnoll-Sussman FH, Bergwerk A, Eliakim R, Legnani P, Lewis BS, Rubin M, et al. New capsule endoscopy viewing mode may improve reading efficiency without effect on pathology detection rate [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:AB227.
13. Westerhof J, Koonnsta J, Weersma K. Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times? Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 694:497-502.
14. Günther U, Daum S, Zeitz M, Bojarski C. Capsule endoscopy: comparison of two different reading modes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27:521-525.
15. Hosoe N, Rey JF, Imaeda H, Besshob R, Ichikawab R, Ida Y, et al. Evaluations of capsule endoscopy software in reducing the reading time and the rate offalse negatives by inexperienced endoscopists. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2012; 36:66-71.
16. Subramanian V, Mannath V, Telakis E, Ragunath K, Hawkey CJ. Efficacy of new playback functions at reducing small-bowel wireless capsule endoscopy reading times. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57:1624-1628.
17. Zheng Y, Hawkins L, Wolff J, Goloubeva O, Goldberg E. Detection of lesions during capsule endoscopy: physician performance is disappointing. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:554-560.
18. Shiotani A, Honda K, Kawakami M, Murao T, Matsumoto H, Tarumi K, et al. Evaluation of RAPID 5 Access soft ware for examination of capsule endoscopies and reading of the capsule by an endoscopy nurse. J Gastroenterol 2011; 46:138-142.
19. Shiotani A, Honda K, Kawakami M, Kimura Y, Yamanaka Y, Fujita M, et al. Analysis of small-bowel capsule endoscopy reading by using quickview mode: training assistants for reading may produce a high diagnostic yield and save time for physicians. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Saurin J-C, Lapalus MG, Cholet F, D'Halluin PN, Filoche B, Gaudric M, et al. Can we shorten the small-bowel capsule reading time with the 'Quick-view' image detection system? Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:477-481.
21. Jang BI, Lee SH, Moon JS, Cheung DY, Lee IS, Kim JO, et al. Inter-observer agreement on the interpretation of capsule endoscopy findings based on capsule endoscopy structured terminology: a multicenter study by the Korean Gut Image Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45:370-374.
22. Lai LH, Wong GL, Chow DK, Lau JY, Sung JJ, Leung WK. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18:283-286.
23. Cave DR, Fleischer DE, Leighton JA, Faigel DO, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of the endocapsule and the Pillcam SB. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68:487-494.