Detecting friendly, flirtatious, awkward, and assertive speech in speed-dates

Computer Speech and Language

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 89-115

  Ranganath, Rajesh ^a   Jurafsky, Dan ^b   McFarland, Daniel A ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dating; Emotion; Paralinguistics; Prosody

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION; DATING; EMOTION; FEATURE ANALYSIS; LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS; PARALINGUISTICS; PROSODY; SOCIAL COMPUTING; SPOKEN CONVERSATION; SVM CLASSIFIERS;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84867332819     PISSN: 08852308     EISSN: 10958363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2012.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Acton, E.; 2010. Date-uh analysis: On gender differences in the distribution of um and uh, presentation at NWAV-2010.
2. Ang J.; Dhillon R.; Krupski A.; Shriberg E.; and Stolcke A. Prosody-based automatic detection of annoyance and frustration in human-computer dialog interspeech-02 2002
3. Boersma, P.; Weenink, D.; 2005. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (version 4.3.14), [Computer program]. http://www.praat.org/ (retrieved 26.05.05).
4. Brave S.; Nass C.; and Hutchinson K. Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied conversational agent International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62 2 2005 161 178
5. Brennan S.E.; and Schober M.F. How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech Journal of Memory and Language 44 2001 274 296
6. Brown P.; and Levinson S.C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage 1978 Cambridge University Press
7. Chartrand T.L.; and Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 6 1999 893 910
8. Chen F.; Li A.; Wang H.; Wang T.; and Fang Q. Acoustic analysis of friendly speech ICASSP-2004 2004 569 572
9. Coates J. Women Talk 1996 Blackwell
10. Cohn M.A.; Mehl M.R.; and Pennebaker J.W. Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001 Psychological Science 15 2004 687 693
11. Collins S.A. Men's voices and women's choices Animal Behaviour 60 6 2000 773 780
12. Collins S.A.; and Missing C. Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women Animal Behaviour 65 5 2003 997 1004
13. Edelsky C. Who's got the floor? Language in Society 10 1981 383 421
14. Fan R.-E.; Chang K.-W.; Hsieh C.-J.; Wang X.-R.; and Lin C.-J. LIBLINEAR: a library for large linear classification Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 2008 1871 1874
15. Feinberg D.R.; DeBruine L.M.; Jones B.C.; and Perrett D.I. The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women's voices Perception 37 4 2008 615
16. Feinberg D.R.; Jones B.C.; Little A.C.; Burt D.M.; and Perrett D.I. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices Animal Behaviour 69 3 2005 561 568
17. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance 1957 Row, Peterson Evanston, IL
18. Finkel E.J.; and Eastwick P.W. Speed-dating Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 3 2008 193
19. Finkel E.J.; Eastwick P.W.; and Matthews J. Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: a methodological primer Personal Relationships 14 1 2007 149 166
20. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology 1967 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
21. Godfrey J.; Holliman E.; and McDaniel J. SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development ICASSP-92 San Francisco 1992 517 520
22. Goffman E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior 1967 Pantheon Books
23. Goffman E. Forms of Talk 1981 University of Pennsylvania Press
24. Goodwin C. Transparent vision Ochs E. Schegloff E.A. Thompson S.A. Interaction and Grammar 1996 Cambridge University Press 370 404
25. Goodwin C.; and Goodwin M. Concurrent operations on talk: notes on the interactive organization of assessments IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1 1987 1 52
26. Gravano A.; and Hirschberg J. Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue Computer Speech and Language 25 3 2011 601 634
27. Gravano1 A.; Levitan R.; Willson L.; Beňuš Štefan.; Hirschberg J.; and Nenkova A. Acoustic and prosodic correlates of social behavior. INTERSPEECH 2011 2011
28. Grossman R.; Bemis R.; Plesa Skwerer D.; and Tager-Flusberg H. Lexical and affective prosody in children with high-functioning autism Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53 3 2010 778
29. Gumperz J. Discourse Strategies 1982 Cambridge University Press
30. Heritage J. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology 1984 Polity Press Cambridge
31. Higgins E.T.; and Bargh J.A. Social cognition and social perception Annual Review of Psychology 38 1987 369 425
32. House D. Phrase-final rises as a prosodic feature in wh-questions in Swedish human-machine dialogue Speech Communication 46 3-4 2005 268 283
33. Huang Y.-M.; and Du S.-X. Weighted support vector machine for classification with uneven training class sizes Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 7 2005 4365 4369
34. Ireland M.E.; Slatcher R.B.; Eastwick P.W.; Scissors L.E.; Finkel E.J.; and Pennebaker J.W. Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability Psychological Science 22 1 2011 39
35. Jaffe J.; and Anderson S.W. Communication rhythms and the evolution of language Siegman A. Feldstein S. Of Speech and Temporal Speech Patterns in Interpersonal Contexts 1979 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale NJ
36. Jones B.C.; Feinberg D.R.; DeBruine L.M.; Little A.C.; and Vukovic J. A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch Animal Behaviour 79 1 2010 57 62
37. Jurafsky D. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive Language 72 1996 533 578
38. Jurafsky, D.; Shriberg, E.; Biasca, D.; 1997. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Labeling Project Coder's Manual, Draft 13. Tech. Rep. 97-02, University of Colorado Institute of Cognitive Science.
39. Jurafsky D.; Shriberg E.; Fox B.; and Curl T. Lexical, prosodic, and syntactic cues for dialog acts Proceedings, COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers 1998 114 120
40. Kenny D. Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis 1998 Guilford Press New York, NY
41. Kenny D.A.; Kashy D.; and Cook W.L. Dyadic Data Analysis 2006 Guilford Press New York
42. Krahé B. Self-serving biases in perceived similarity and causal attributions of other people's performance Social Psychology Quarterly 46 1983 318 329
43. Lakoff G. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 4 1973 458 508
44. Lee C.M.; and Narayanan S.S. Combining acoustic and language information for emotion recognition ICSLP-02 Denver, CO 2002 873 876
45. Leifer E.; and Rajah V. Getting observations: strategic ambiguities in social interaction Soziale Systeme 6 2000 251 267
46. Levitan R.; and Hirschberg J. Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions ACL 2011 2011
47. Li A.; and Wang H. Friendly speech analysis and perception in standard Chinese INTERSPEECH-2004 2004 897 900
48. Liscombe J.; Venditti J.; and Hirschberg J. Classifying subject ratings of emotional speech using acoustic features INTERSPEECH-03 2003 725 728
49. Madan A.; Caneel R.; and Pentland A. Voices of attraction Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Augmented Cognition, HCI International 2005 Las Vegas 2005
50. Mairesse F.; and Walker M. Trainable generation of big-five personality styles through data-driven parameter estimation ACL-08 2008
51. Mairesse F.; Walker M.; Mehl M.; and Moore R. Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 30 2007 457 500
52. Mehl M.R.; Gosling S.D.; and Pennebaker J.W. Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 5 2006 862 877
53. Namdy L.L.; Nygaard L.C.; and Sauerteig D. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: the role of perception Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21 4 2002 422 432
54. Nass C.; and Brave S. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship 2005 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
55. Natale M. Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 5 1975 790 804
56. Nenkova A.; Gravano A.; and Hirschberg J. High frequency word entrainment in spoken dialogue Proceedings of ACL 2008 2008
57. Newman M.L.; Pennebaker J.W.; Berry D.S.; and Richards J.M. Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic style Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 2003 665 675
58. Ng A.Y. Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance ICML 2004 2004
59. Niederhoffer K.G.; and Pennebaker J.W. Linguistic style matching in social interaction Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21 4 2002 337 360
60. Pardo J.S. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction JASA 119 4 2006 2382 2393
61. Pennebaker, J. W.; Booth, R.; Francis, M.; 2007. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2007 - operator's manual. Tech. rep.; University of Texas.
62. Pennebaker J.W.; and King L.A. Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 6 1999 1296
63. Pennebaker J.W.; and Lay T.C. Language use and personality during crises: analyses of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's press conferences Journal of Research in Personality 36 2002 271 282
64. Pentland A. Socially aware computation and communication Computer 2005 63 70
65. Pon-Barry H.; and Shieber S.M. Recognizing uncertainty in speech EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing: Special Issue on Emotion and Mental State Recognition from Speech 2011 2011
66. Potts C. On the negativity of negation Li N. Lutz D. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20 2011 CLC Publications Ithaca, NY 636 659
67. Puts D.A.; Barndt J.L.; Welling L.L.M.; Dawood K.; and Burriss R.P. Intrasexual competition among women: vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness Personality and Individual Differences 50 1 2011 111 115
68. Rosenberg A.; and Hirschberg J. Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech EUROSPEECH-05 Lisbon, Portugal 2005 513 516
69. Rude S.S.; Gortner E.M.; and Pennebaker J.W. Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students Cognition and Emotion 18 2004 1121 1133
70. Schegloff E.A.; Jefferson G.; and Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation Language 53 1977 361 382
71. Scherer K.R. Personality inference from voice quality: the loud voice of extroversion European Journal of Social Psychology 8 1978 467 487
72. Scherer K.R. Psychological models of emotion Borod J. The Neuropsychology of Emotion 2000 Oxford University Press 137 162
73. Scherer K.R. Vocal communication of emotion: a review of research paradigms Speech Communication 40 1-2 2003 227 256
74. Schiffrin D. Information and participation: y'know and i mean Discourse Markers 1987 Cambridge University Press
75. Street R.L. Jr. Noncontent speech convergence in adult-child interactions Bostrom R. Communication Yearbook 7 1983 Sage Beverly Hills, CA 369 395
76. Taylor H. Balance in Small Groups 1970 Von Nostrand Reinhold Company New York, NY (Chapter 2)