CE-MRA for follow-up of aneurysms post stent-assisted coiling

Interventional Neuroradiology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 275-283

  Agid, Ronit ^a   Schaaf, M ^a   Farb, Ri ^b  

^a TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Aneurysmal remnants; Cerebral angiography; DSA; Follow up; Marker band effect; MR angiography; MRA; Parent artery stenosis; Stent assisted coiling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COIL EMBOLIZATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; ENDOVASCULAR STENT ASSISTED COILING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT;

EID: 84867321509     PISSN: 15910199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/159101991201800305     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005; 366: 809-817. (Pubitemid 41557380)
2. Willinsky RA, Peltz J, da Costa L, et al. Clinical and angiographic follow-up of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30: 1035-1040.
3. Grunwald IQ, Papanagiotou P, Struffert T, et al. Recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2007; 49: 41-47. (Pubitemid 46062645)
4. Holmin S, Krings T, Ozanne A, et al. Intradural saccular aneurysms treated by Guglielmi detachable bare coils at a single institution between 1993 and 2005: clinical long-term follow-up for a total of 1810 patient-years in relation to morphological treatment results. Stroke. 2008; 39: 2288-2297.
5. Ferns SP, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke. 2009; 40: e523-529.
6. Tan IY, Agid RF, Willinsky RA. Recanalization rates after endovascular coil embolization in a cohort of matched ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011; 17: 27-35.
7. Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26: 1349-1356. (Pubitemid 43733427)
8. Leclerc X, Navez JF, Gauvrit JY, et al. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 1121-1127.
9. Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison with 3D digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14: 1162-1168. (Pubitemid 38979208)
10. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, et al. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: CEMRA versus DSA. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29: 1570-1574.
11. Lubicz B, Levivier M, Sadeghi N, et al. Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol. 2007; 34: 190-197. (Pubitemid 47042903)
12. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology. 2003; 227: 522-528. (Pubitemid 36514772)
13. Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 1154-1157. (Pubitemid 39095159)
14. Farb RI, Nag S, Scott JN, et al. Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology. 2005; 47: 507-515. (Pubitemid 41086405)
15. Lubicz B, Neugroschl C, Collignon L, et al. Is digital substraction angiography still needed for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by embolisation with detachable coils? Neuroradiology. 2008; 50: 841-848.
16. Schaafsma JD, Velthuis BK, Majoie CB, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement: test characteristics of follow-up MR angiography - multicenter study. Radiology. 2010; 256: 209-218.
17. Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30: 1665-1671.
18. Hartman J, Nguyen T, Larsen D, et al. MR artifacts, heat production, and ferromagnetism of Guglielmi detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol. 1997; 18: 497-501. (Pubitemid 27154565)
19. Lettau M, Sauer A, Heiland S, et al. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30: 1993-1997.
20. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 1996; 23: 815-850. (Pubitemid 26192503)
21. Bartels LW, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47: 171-180. (Pubitemid 34019706)