Validation of administrative data sources for endoscopy utilization in colorectal cancer diagnosis

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Li, Xue ^a   Hilsden, Robert ^b   Hossain, Shakhawat ^c,d   Fleming, John ^a   Winget, Marcy ^a,c  

^a ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

Administrative data; Agreement; Colorectal endoscopy; Data validation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER STAGING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ALBERTA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84867317998     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-358     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Assessing quality using administrative data. Iezzoni LI, Ann Intern Med 1997 127 666 74 9382378
2. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality. Logan JR, Lieberman DA, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010 20 717 34 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.007 20889074
3. Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems. Peabody JW, Luck J, Jain S, Bertenthal D, Glassman P, Medical Care 2004 42 1066 72 10.1097/00005650-200411000-00005 15586833
4. Quality of hospital discharge and physician data for type of breast cancer surgery. Pinfold SP, Goel V, Sawka C, Medical Care 2000 38 99 107 10.1097/00005650-200001000-00011 10630724
5. Administrative data and measurement of colonoscopy quality: not ready for prime time? Smalley W, Gastrointest Endosc 2011 73 454 5 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11. 042 21353842
6. Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Tollefson MK, Gettman MT, Karnes RJ, Frank I, J Urol 2011 185 1686 90 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.039 21419458
7. Same question, different data source, different answers? Data source agreement for surgical procedures on women with breast cancer. Turner D, Hildebrand KJ, Fradette KSL, Healthc Policy 2007 3 46 54 19305755
8. Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Woodworth GF, Baird CJ, Garces-Ambrossi G, Tonascia J, Tamargo RJ, Neurosurgery 2009 65 251 6 10.1227/01.NEU.0000347003.35690.7A 19625902
9. Accuracy of administrative claims data for polypectomy. Wyse JM, Joseph L, Barkun AN, Sewitch MJ, CMAJ 2011 183 743 E747 10.1503/cmaj.100897 21670107
10. Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Abraham NS, Gossey JT, Davila JA, Al-Oudat S, Kramer JK, Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 1320 8 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00545.x 16771956
11. Validation of diabetes case definitions using administrative claims data. Amed S, Vanderloo SE, Metzger D, Collet JP, Reimer K, McCrea P, Johnson JA, Diabet Med 2011 28 424 7 21392063
12. Validation of diagnoses of peptic ulcers and bleeding from administrative databases: a multi-health maintenance organization study. Andrade SE, Gurwitz JH, Chan KA, Donahue JG, Beck A, Boles M, Buist DS, Goodman M, LaCroix AZ, Levin TR, Platt R, J Clin Epidemiol 2002 55 310 3 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00480-2 11864803
13. Validity of autism diagnoses using administrative health data. Dodds L, Spencer A, Shea S, Fell D, Armson BA, Allen AC, Bryson S, Chronic Dis Can 2009 29 102 7 19527568
14. Lix L, Yogendran M, Burchill C, Metge C, McKeen N, Moore D, Bond R, Defining and validating chronic diseases: an administrative data approach Winnipeg: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy 2006 Ref Type: Generic
15. Identifying type 1 and type 2 diabetic cases using administrative data: a tree-structured model. Lo-Ciganic W, Zgibor JC, Ruppert K, Arena VC, Stone RA, J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011 5 486 93 21722564
16. Accuracy of administrative health data for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal diseases. Lopushinsky SR, Covarrubia KA, Rabeneck L, Austin PC, Urbach DR, Surg Endosc 2007 21 1733 7 10.1007/s00464-006-9136-1 17285379
17. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer. Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, Sparapani RA, Freeman JL, Health Serv Res 2004 39 1733 49 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00315.x 15533184
18. Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal cancer? a comparison of two health plans. Ramsey S, Mandelson M, Etzioni R, Harrison R, Smith R, Taplin S, Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2004 5 27 37 10.1007/s10742-005-5562-0
19. Accuracy of administrative databases in identifying patients with hypertension. Tu K, Campbell NR, Chen ZL, Cauch-Dudek KJ, McAlister FA, Open Med 2007 1 18 e26 20101286
20. Developing and validating a diabetes database in a large health system. Zgibor JC, Orchard TJ, Saul M, Piatt G, Ruppert K, Stewart A, Siminerio LM, Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007 75 313 9 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.07.007 16934906
21. The utility of administrative data for measuring adherence to cancer surveillance care guidelines. Cooper GS, Schultz L, Simpkins J, Lafata JE, Med Care 2007 45 66 72 10.1097/01.mlr.0000241107.15133.54 17279022
22. Assessing accuracy of diagnosis-type indicators for flagging complications in administrative data. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA, J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 366 72 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.01.002 15135837
23. A retrospective study on the use of post-operative colonoscopy following potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province. Hilsden RJ, Bryant HE, Sutherland LR, Brasher PM, Fields AL, BMC Cancer 2004 4 14 10.1186/1471-2407-4-14 15096279
24. Using an asthma control questionnaire and administrative data to predict health-care utilization. Peters D, Chen C, Markson LE, Len-Ramey FC, Vollmer WM, Chest 2006 129 918 924 10.1378/chest.129.4.918 16608939
25. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, et al. (eds): International Classification of Diseases for Oncology Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 3 2000
26. Collaborative Staging Task Force of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Collaborative Staging Manual and Coding Instructions, version 01.04.00 Jointly published by American Joint Committee on Cancer (Chicago, IL) and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Bethesda, MD) 2004 NIH Publication Number 04-5496. Incorporates updates through September 8, 2006
27. Ascertainment of colonoscopy indication using administrative data. Fisher DA, Grubber JM, Castor JM, Coffman CJ, Dig Dis Sci 2010 55 1721 5 10.1007/s10620-010-1200-y 20393875
28. An automated data algorithm to distinguish screening and diagnostic colorectal cancer endoscopy exams. Haque R, Chiu V, Mehta KR, Geiger AM, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005 35 116 118 16287897
29. Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees. Schenck AP, Klabunde CN, Warren JL, Peacock S, Davis WW, Hawley ST, Pignone M, Ransohoff DF, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007 16 2118 27 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0123 17932360
30. Administrative data used to identify patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Goff SL, Feld A, Andrade SE, Mahoney L, Beaton SJ, Boudreau DM, Davis RL, Goodman M, Hartsfield CL, Platt R, Roblin D, Smith D, Yood MU, Dodd K, Gurwitz JH, J Clin Epidemiol 2008 61 617 21 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.013 18471667
31. External validation of a claims-based algorithm for classifying kidney-cancer surgeries. Miller DC, Saigal CS, Warren JL, Leventhal M, Deapen D, Banerjee M, Lai J, Hanley J, Litwin MS, BMC Health Serv Res 2009 9 92 10.1186/1472-6963-9-92 19500395
32. Canadian Institute for Health Information http://www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext- portal/internet/EN/TabbedContent/standards+and+data+submission/data+quality/ cihi021513