The outcomes of navigation-assisted bone tumour surgery: Minimum three-year follow-up

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1414-1420

  Cho, H S ^a,b   Oh, J H ^a,b   Han, I ^c   Kim, H S ^c  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMELOBLASTOMA; ARTICLE; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE TUMOR; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CHILD; CHONDROSARCOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVENT FREE SURVIVAL; EWING SARCOMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; LIMB SALVAGE; MALE; MALIGNANT FIBROUS HISTIOCYTOMA; METAPHYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OSTEOSARCOMA; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BONE NEOPLASMS; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867312693     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.28638     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;426:174-179. (Pubitemid 39167126)
2. Hart R, Krejzla J, Svab P, Kocis J, Stipcak V. Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2008;24:569-578.
3. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 2000;25:606-614. (Pubitemid 30158220)
4. Cho HS, Kang HG, Kim HS, Han I. Computer-assisted sacral tumor resection: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:1561-1566. (Pubitemid 351947599)
5. Wong KC, Kumta SM, Chiu KH, et al. Precision tumour resection and reconstruction using image-guided computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:943-947. (Pubitemid 47322796)
6. Hufner T, Kfuri M Jr, Galanski M, et al. New indications for computer-assisted surgery: tumor resection in the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;426:219-225. (Pubitemid 39167133)
7. Cho HS, Oh JH, Han I, Kim HS. Joint-preserving limb salvage surgery under navigation guidance. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:227-232.
8. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:241-246. (Pubitemid 23059493)
9. Cho HS, Park IH, Jeon IH, et al. Direct application of MR images to computerassisted bone tumor surgery. J Orthop Sci 2011;16:190-195.
10. Estrada-Aguilar J, Greenberg H, Walling A, et al. Primary treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma: report of five cases. Cancer 1992;69:1137-1145.
11. Fahey M, Spanier SS, Vander Griend RA. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: a clinical and histopathological study of twenty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74-A:321-330.
12. Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, et al. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:796-802. (Pubitemid 29438353)
13. Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;348:196-207. (Pubitemid 28160824)
14. Marangolo M, Tienghi A, Fiorentini G, et al. Treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol 1992;3(Suppl 2):S19-S21.
15. Ozaki T, Flege S, Kevric M et al. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis: experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:334-341. (Pubitemid 46613482)
16. Cartiaux O, Docquier PL, Paul L, et al. Surgical inaccuracy of tumor resection and reconstruction within the pelvis: an experimental study. Acta Orthop 2008;79:695-702.
17. Leong JL, Batra PS, Citardi MJ. CT-MR image fusion for the management of skull base lesions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:868-876.
18. Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Schuster A, et al. Clinical applications of registration and fusion of multimodality brain images from PET, SPECT, CT, and MRI. Eur J Radiol 1996;21:174-182. (Pubitemid 26097558)
19. Wong KC, Kumta SM, Antonio GE, Tse LF. Image fusion for computer-assisted bone tumor surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:2533-2541.
20. West J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:554-566. (Pubitemid 27432693)
21. Pappas IP, Puja M, Styner M, Liu J, Caversaccio M. New method to assess the registration of CT-MR images of the head. Injury 2004;35(Suppl 1):105-112.
22. Baidya KP, Ramakrishna S, Rahman M, Ritchie A. Quantitative radiographic analysis of fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Biomater Appl 2001;15:279-289. (Pubitemid 32286554)