Quality metric to assess video streaming service over TCP considering temporal location of pauses

IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 985-992

  Rodriguez, Demostenes Z ^a   Abrahao, Julia ^a   Begazo, Dante ^a   Rosa, Renata L ^a   Bressan, Graca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

MOS; QoE; Subjective Test; TCP; Video Quality; Video Streaming

Indexed keywords

MOS; QOE; SUBJECTIVE TESTS; TCP; VIDEO QUALITY;

QUALITY OF SERVICE; VIDEO STREAMING;

TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

EID: 84867308793     PISSN: 00983063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCE.2012.6311346     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Z. Chen, C. Lin, and X. Wei, "Enabling on-demand Internet Video Streaming Services to Multi-terminal Users in Large Scale," IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1988-1996, Oct. 2009.
2. O. Hiroki, H. Hisamatsu and H. Noborio, "Design and Evaluation of Hybrid Congestion Control Mechanism for Video Streaming," in Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. pp. 585-590, Pafos, Cyprus, Sep. 2011.
3. H. Hisamatsu, G. Hasegawa, and M. Murata, "Non bandwidth-intrusive video streaming over TCP," Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Information Technology, pp. 78-83, Las Vegas, U.S., Apr. 2011.
4. L. Cai, X. Shen, J. Pan, and J.Mark, "Performance analysis of TCP friendly AIMD algorithms for multimedia applications," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, pp. 339-355, Apr. 2005. (Pubitemid 40454763)
5. H-J. Park and D-H. Har, "Subjective Image Quality Assessment based on Objective Image Quality Measurement Factors," IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1176-1184, Aug. 2011.
6. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. Sheikh, "Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, No. 4, Apr 2004.
7. M. Pinson and S. Wolf, "A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality," IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 312-322, Sep. 2004.
8. H. Kwon, H. Han, S. Lee, W. Choi, and B. Kang, "New Video Enhancement Preprocessor Using the Region-Of-Interest for the Videoconferencing," IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 2644-2651, Nov. 2010.
9. J. You, A. Perkis, M. Gabbouj, and M. M. Hannuksela, "Perceptual quality assessment based on visual attention analysis," in Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, pp. 561-564, Beijing, China, May, 2009
10. A. K. Noorthy and A. C. Bovik, "Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment," IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Processing, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193-201, Apr. 2009.
11. T. Porter and X. H. Peng, "An Objective Approach to Measuring Video Playback Quality in Loss Networks using TCP," IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2011.
12. R. Mok, E. Chan, R. Chang, "Measuring the Quality of Experience of HTTP Video Streaming," in Proc. of IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), pp. 485-492, Dublin, Ireland, May, 2011.
13. ITU-T Report 2007, "Definition of Quality of Experience (QoE)," International Telecommunication Union, Liaison Statement, Ref.: TD 109rev2 (PLEN/12), Jan. 2007.
14. R. Laghari, K. Crespi, N. Molina, B. Palau, "QoE aware Service Delivery in Distributed Environment," IEEE Workshops of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 837-842. Mar, Biopolis, Singapore, Mar. 2011.
15. G. Nyman, J. Radun, T. Leisti, and T. Vouri, "From image fidelity to subjective quality: a hybrid qualitative/quantitative methodology for measuring subjective image quality for different image contents", in Proc. of the International Display Workshops, vol. 12, 1817-1820, 2005.
16. G. Nyman, J. Radun, T. Leisti, J. Oja, H. Ojanen, J. Olives, T. Vuori and J. Hikkinen, "What do users really perceive: probing the subjective image quality experience", Proceedings of the IST/SPIE's: Imaging Quality and System Performance III, vol. 6059, pp. 1-7, Jan. 2006.
17. ITU-R, "Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures," Tech. Rep. BT.500-11, 2002.
18. ITU-R, "Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications", Tech. Rec. P.910, Geneva, Abr. 2008.
19. J. Blin, "New quality evaluation method suited to multimedia context: Samviq," in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics, VPQM'06, Arizona, U.S., Jan. 2006.
20. J. Redi, H. Liu, H. Alers, R. Zunino, and I. Heynderickx, "Comparing Subjective Image Quality Measurement Methods for the Creation of Public Databases," in Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE vol. 1, no. 7529, California, U.S., Jan. 2010.
21. K. Seshadrinathan, A.C. Bovik, "Temporal hysteresis model of time varying subjective video quality," in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1153-1156, Jul. 2011.
22. J. You; J. Korhonen, J.; A. Perkis, "Attention modeling for video quality assessment: Balancing global quality and local quality," in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 914-919, Singapore, Jul. 2010.
23. D. Rodríguez, M. Arjona, "VoIP Quality Improvement with a Ratedetermination Algorithm", in Proc. of International Workshop on Telecommunications, pp. 30-34, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Feb. 2009.