Improving operational support in hospital wards through vocal interfaces and process-awareness

Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Cossu, Fabrizio ^a   Marrella, Andrea ^a   Mecella, Massimo ^a   Russo, Alessandro ^a   Bertazzoni, Giuliano ^a   Suppa, Marianna ^a   Grasso, Francesco ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL GUIDELINE; DAILY ACTIVITY; HOSPITAL WARDS; TOUCH INTERFACES; VIABLE SOLUTIONS; VOCAL INTERFACE;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MOBILE DEVICES; USER INTERFACES;

HOSPITALS;

EID: 84867300847     PISSN: 10637125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CBMS.2012.6266329     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. P. Ciccarese et al. A guideline management system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 107:28-32, 2004.
2. P. A. de Clercq et al. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artificial Intell. in Medicine, 31(1):1-27, 2004.
3. A. Dix et al. Human-computer interaction. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1997.
4. J. Fox et al. Disseminating Medical Knowledge: the PRO-forma Approach. Artificial Intell. in Medicine, 14(1-2):157-181, 1998.
5. M. L. Geleijnse et al. Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram. European Heart J., 21(5):397-406, 2000.
6. J. Horsky et al. Technology for Emergency Care: Cognitive and Workflow Considerations. In AMIA Annu. Symp., 2006.
7. G. Hripcsak et al. Rationale for the Arden Syntax. Computers and Biomedical Research, 27(4):291-324, 1994.
8. D. Isern and A. Moreno. Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: a review. Int. J. of Medical Informatics, 77(12):787-808, 2008.
9. A. Laxmisan et al. The multitasking clinician: decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int. J. of Medical Informatics, 76(11-12):801-811, 2007.
10. R. Lenz and M. Reichert. IT support for healthcare processes - Premises, challenges, perspectives. Data & Knowledge Eng., 61(1):39-58, 2007.
11. R. S. Mans et al. Process-Aware Information System Development for the Healthcare Domain - Consistency, Reliability, and Effectiveness. In BPM 2009 Workshops.
12. F. Ottani et al. Percorso di valutazione del dolore toracico - Valutazione dei requisiti di base per l'implementazione negli ospedali italiani, (in Italian), Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, 10:46-63, 2009.
13. M. Peleg et al. Comparing Computer-Interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-Study Approach. J. of the AMIA, 10(1):52-68, 2003.
14. S. Quaglini et al. Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artificial Intell. in Medicine, 22(1):65-80, 2001.
15. G. Slavich and G. Buonocore. Forensic medicine aspects in patients with chest pain in the emergency room. Italian Heart J. Suppl., 2(4):381-384, 2001.
16. F. A. Sonnenberg and C. G. Hagerty. Computer-Interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines. Where are we and where are we going? Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 45:145-158, 2006.
17. S.W. Tu and M. A. Musen. A flexible approach to guideline modeling. In AMIA Annu. Symp., 1999.
18. D. Wang et al. Representation Primitives, Process Models and Patient Data in Computer-Interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Literature Review of Guideline Representation Models. Int. J. of Medical Informatics, 68:1-3, 2002.