Prediction of breast cancer using artificial neural networks

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 2901-2907

  Saritas, Ismail ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; BI RADS; Breast cancer; Breast cancer prediction

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SURVIVAL PREDICTION; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84867299673     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-011-9768-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Firat, D.; Hayran, M.; Cancer Statistics in Turkey and in the World (1990-1992). Turkish Association for Cancer Research and Control. Iz Press, Ankara, 1995.
2. Şengelen, M.; Kutluk, T.; FIrat, D.; Cancer statistics in Turkey and in the World (1996-2003). Turkish Association for Cancer Research and Control. Iz Press, Ankara, 2007.
3. Stomper PC, Connolly JC, Meyer JE, et al. (1989) Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in-situ detected with mammography: Analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 172-235
4. Holland, R.; Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Eur. Radiol. 10:327-330, 2000.
5. American College of Radiology, Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edition. American College of the Radiology, Reston, VA, 1998.
6. Erkul, Z. K.; Erkuş, M.; TaşkIn, F.; Meteoǧlu, I.; Liesegang ring calcification in breast biopsy: case report. J. Breast Healthy. 1(1):22-24, 2005.
7. Gülsün, M.; DemirkazIk, F. B.; Köksal, A.; ArIyürek, M.; According to BI-RADS assessment of breast microcalcifications and to investigate the agreement between reviewers. Off. J. Turkish Soc. Radiol. 8(3):358-363, 2002.
8. Renee, W.; Pinsky, M. D.; Mark, A.; Helvie, M. D.; Medscape mammographic breast density: Effect on imaging and breast cancer risk: Breast density measurement. JNCCN-J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 8:1157-1165, 2010.
9. Edward, T. B.; Rick, K.; Robert, R.; Conn's current therapy. Elsevier INC, Saunders, Philadelphia, 2011.
10. Elter, M.; Schulz-Wendtland, R.; Wittenberg, T.; The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process. Med. Phys. 34(11):4164-4172, 2007.
11. Nassif, H.; Page, D.; Ayvaci, M.; Shavlik, J.; Burnside, E. S.; Uncovering age-specific invasive and DCIS breast cancer rules using inductive logic programming. In: Veinot, T. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI '10). ACM, New York, pp. 76-82, 2010.
12. American College of Radiology, Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2003.
13. Baker, J. A.; Kornguth, P. J.; Lo, J. Y.; Williford, M. E.; Floyd, C. E.; Breast cancer: Prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 196:817-822, 1995.
14. Markey, M. K.; Lo, J. Y.; Vargas-Voracek, R.; Tourassi, G. D.; Floyd, C. E.; Perception error surface analysis: A case study in breast cancer diagnosis. Comput. Biol. Med. 32:99-109, 2002.
15. Floyd, C. E.; Lo, J. Y.; Tourassi, G. D.; Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions, AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 175:1347-1352, 2000.
16. Bilska-Wolak, A. O.; Floyd, C. E.; Investigating different similarity measures for a case-based reasoning classifier to predict breast cancer. Proc SPIE 4322:1862-1866, 2001.
17. Bilska-Wolak, A. O.; Floyd, C. E.; Development and evaluation of a case-based reasoning classifier for prediction of breast biopsy outcome with BI-RADS lexicon. Med. Phys. 29:2090-2100, 2002.
18. Bilska-Wolak, A. O.; Floyd, C. E.; Lo, J. Y.; Baker, J. A.; Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: Validation on new cases. Acad. Radiol. 12:671-680, 2005.
19. Markey, M. K.; Fischer, E. A.; Lo, J. Y. Bayesian networks of BIRADS descriptors for breast lesion classifications. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. San Francisco, California 3031-3034, 2004
20. UCI Machine Learning Repository: Data Sets 2007. http://archive.ics.uci. edu/ml/datasets/Mammographic+Mass, Accessed 29 March 2011
21. Saritas, I.; Ozkan, I. A.; Sert, I. U.; Prognosis of prostate cancer by artificial neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(9):6646-6650, 2010.
22. Ronco, A. L.; Fernandez, R.; Improving ultrasonographic diagnosis of prostate cancer with neural networks. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25(5):729-733, 1999.
23. Allahverdi, N.; Expert systems. An artificial Intelligence application. Atlas Press, Istanbul, 2002.
24. Türker, N.; Tokan, F.; YIldIrIm, T. Determination of artificial neural networks performances by roc analysis on the diagnosis of heart disease. Biomedical Engineering National Congres, BIYOMUT 2005, Istanbul 206-208, 2005.
25. Wichard, J.D.; Cammann, H.; Stephan, C.; Tolxdorff, T. Classification models for early detection of prostate cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 7, 2008.