Informal prerequisites for informal proofs

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 9-16

  Heinze, Aiso ^a   Kwak, Jee Yi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867287638     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02655688     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of Proof in Pupils Practice of School Mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, Teachers, and Children, (216-235). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
2. Balacheff, N. (1991). Treatment of refutations: Aspects of the complexity of a constructivist approach to mathematics learning. In E. von Glasersfeld, (ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education, (89-110). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Baumert, J., Bos, W. & Lehmann, R. (2000). TIMSS/III-Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn. Mathematische und physikalische Kompetenzen am Ende der gymnasialen Oberstufe (Bd. 2). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
4. Beaton, A. E.; Mullis, I.V.S.; Martin, M. O.; Gonzalez, E. J.; Kelly, D. L.; Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years. IEA's third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy.
5. Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, 7/8.
6. Burger, W. F. & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1985) Spadework Prior to Deduction in Geometry. Mathematics Teacher 78 (6), 419-428.
7. Burger, W. F. & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986) Characterising the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 17 (1), 31-48.
8. Clemens, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In: D. A. Grouws (ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (420-464).New York: Macmillian.
9. Deutsches Pisa-Konsortium (Hrsg.). (2001). PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
10. de Villiers, M. (1992). Children's Acceptance of Theorems in Geometry. Poster presentation at the 16th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 16), University of New Hampshire, USA.
11. Flavell, J. H. (1977). Cognitive Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Pretince Hall.
12. Greeno, J. G. (1980). Some examples of cognitive task analysis with instructional implications. In: R. E. Snow, P. Frederico, W. E. Montague (Eds.) Aptitude, learning and instruction, Vol. 2, (1-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Hanna, G. (1983). Rigorous proof in mathematics education. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
14. Hanna, G. (1997). The ongoing value of proof. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 18, 171-185.
15. Hanna, G. & Jahnke, H. N. (1996). Chapter 23: Proof and Proving. In: Bishop, A. J.; Clements, K.; Keitel, C.; Kilpatrick, J.; Laborde, C. (eds.) International Handbook on Mathematics Education. Vol. 4, Part 2, (877-908). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (1998). Students' Proof Schemes: Results from Exploratory Studies. In A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, (234-283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
17. Healy, L & Hoyles, C. (1998). Justifying and proving in school mathematics. Technical Report on the Nationwide Survey. Mathematical Science. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
18. Hershkowitz, R. & Vinner, S. (1980). Concept Images and Common Cognitive Paths in the Development of Some Simple Geometrical Concepts. In: R. Karplus (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (177-184). Berkley: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science.
19. Hershkowitz, R. & Vinner, S. (1982). Basic geometric concepts - definitions and images. In: Vermandel, A. Wilrijk, Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (18-23). Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Antwerp (Belgium).
20. Hoyles, C. & Küchemann, D. (2001). Identifying Differences in Students' Evaluation of Mathematical Reasons. Paper presented at the British Congress of Mathematics Education, March 2001, Manchester.
21. Koedinger (1998). Conjecturing and argumentation in highschool geometry students. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.). Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Koedinger, K. R. & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511-550.
23. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
24. Lehrer, R. & Chazan, D. (Eds.) (1998). Designing Learning Enviroments for Developing Understanding of Geometry. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Moore, R. C. (1994). Making transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249-266.
26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.) (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
27. Reiss, K., Klieme, E. & Heinze, A. (2001). Prerequisites for the understanding of proofs in the geometry classroom. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 4, (97-104). Utrecht (The Netherlands): Utrecht University.
28. Reiss, K. & Thomas, J. (2001). Wissenschaftliches Denken beim Beweisen in der Geometrie. Ergebnisse einer Studie mit Schülerinnen und Schülern der gymnasialen Oberstufe. Mathematica didactica 23 (1), 96-112.
29. Reiss, K. & Hellmich, F. (submitted). Bedingungen für das Argumentieren, Begründen und Beweisen in der Sekundarstufe. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik.
30. Senk, S. (1985). How Well Do Students Write Geometry Proofs? Mathematics Teacher 78 (6), 448-456.
31. Vinner, S. (1991). The Role of Definitions in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. In: D. Tall (ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking, (65-81). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Wilson (1986). The role of negative instances in geometric feature identification task. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 17, 130-139.
33. Wilson (1990). Inconsistent ideas related to definitions and examples. Focus on Learning Problems of Mathematics 12 (3/4), 31-47.