Understanding eParticipation State of Play in Europe

Information Systems Management

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 321-330

  Tambouris, Efthimios ^a   Macintosh, Ann ^b   Smith, Simon ^b   Panopoulou, Eleni ^a   Tarabanis, Konstantinos ^a   Millard, Jeremy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c DANISH TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

analytical framework; electronic participation (eParticipation); impact assessment; survey

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; E-PARTICIPATION; EXTERNAL FACTORS; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS;

HARDWARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84867279635     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716994     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aichholzer, G. and Westholm, H. 2009. Evaluating eParticipation projects: Practical examples and outline of an evaluation framework. European Journal of ePractice, 7: 27-44. ISSN: 1988-625X
2. Chevallier, M., Warynski, M., & Sdoz, A. (2006). Success factors of Geneva's e-Voting system. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on e-Government, 77-85, Marburg, Germany, April 27-28 http://www.google.com/books?id=KHmF1aZtUaYC&printsec=frontcover&hl=el#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed: November 21 2011, from).
3. Dalakiouridou, E., Smith, S., Tambouris, E. and Tarabanis, K. 2012. Electronic participation policies and initiatives in the European Union institutions. Social Science Computer Review, 3: 297-323.
4. Eriksen, E. 2007. "Conceptualising European public spheres-General, segmented and strong publics". In The European Union and the public sphere: a communicative space in the making?, Edited by: Fossum, J. and Schlesinger, P. 23-43. London, England: Routledge.
5. Fagan, G. H., Newman, D., McCusker, P., & Murray, M. (2006). E-consultation: evaluating appropriate technologies and processes for citizens' participation in public policy. HEA http://www.nuim.ie/nirsa/econsult/ (http://www.nuim.ie/nirsa/econsult/) (Accessed: from).
6. Frances, J., Levačic, R., Mitchell, J. and Thompson, G. 1991. "Introduction". In Markets, Hierarchies & Networks: the coordination of social life, Edited by: Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levačic, R. and Mitchell, J. 1-20. London: Sage.
7. Kubicek, H. (2007). Electronic democracy and deliberative consultation on urban projects: Putting e-Democracy into context. Report for the Congress of Regional and Local Authorities. Bremen, Germany: University of Bremen http://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/Creative_final.pdf (http://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/Creative_final.pdf) (Accessed: November 12, 2011, from).
8. Lippa, B., Aichholzer, G., Allhutter, D., Freschi, A. C., Macintosh, A., & Westholm, H. (2008). D13.3 booklet: eParticipation Evaluation and Impact. DEMO-net www.demo-net.org (Accessed: from).
9. Loukis, E., Xenakis, A. and Charalabidis, Y. 2010. An evaluation framework for e-Participation in parliaments. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(1): 25-47.
10. Lührs, R., Albrecht, S., Lübcke, M. and Hohberg, B. September 1-5 2003. "How to grow? Online consultation about growth in the city of Hamburg: Methods, techniques, success factors". In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eGovernment, (EGOV 2003) September 1-5, 79-84. Prague, Czech Republic
11. Macintosh, A. January 5-8 2004. "Characterizing e-Participation in policy-making". In Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS-37) January 5-8, Big Island, HI
12. Macintosh, A. 2006. "eParticipation in policy-making: The research and the challenges". In Exploiting the knowledge factory: Issues, applications, case studies, Edited by: Cunningham, P. and Cunningham, M. 364-369. Amsterdam: IOS Press. In
13. Macintosh, A. and Whyte, A. 2008. Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process & Policy, 2(1): 16-30.
14. Millard, J. 2008. eGovernment measurement for policy makers. European Journal of ePractice, 4: 19-32. (August)
15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2003). Promise and problems of e-Democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/11/35176328.pdf (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/11/35176328.pdf) (Accessed: from).
16. Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E. and Tarabanis, K. 2009. eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing?. European Journal of ePractice, 7, 15-26
17. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science Technology Human Values, 25(1): 3-29. doi: 10.1177/016224390002500101
18. Smith, S. (2009). D3.1c: Main benefits of eParticipation developments in the EU-A contextualisation with reference to the EU governance regime and the European public sphere. European eParticipation http://islab.uom.gr/eP/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=36&&Itemid=82 (Accessed: from).
19. Smith, S., Macintosh, A. and Millard, J. 2011. A three-layered framework for evaluating e-Participation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(4): 304-321.
20. Tambouris, E., Kalampokis, E. and Tarabanis, K. 2008. A survey of eParticipation research projects in the European Union. International Journal of Electronic Business (IJEB), 6(6): 554-571. doi: 10.1504/IJEB.2008.021874
21. Westholm, H. 2003. Adaptability in online democratic engagement: A multi-channel strategy to enhance deliberative policies. Communications, 28(2): 205-227.