Architecture recovery for software evolution

Proceedings of the 2nd Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR 1998

Volumn 1998-March, Issue , 1998, Pages 113-119

  Dueñas, Juan C ^a   De Oliveiray, William Lopes ^a   De La Puente, Juan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; LIFE CYCLE; RECOVERY; REENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

ARCHITECTURAL RECOVERY; ARCHITECTURE RECOVERY; EVOLUTION PATHS; ITS APPLICATIONS; RECOVERY TECHNIQUES; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE RECOVERY; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84867251161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSMR.1998.665766     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. T. Biggerstaff. Design recovery for maintenance and reuse. IEEE Computer, pages 36-49, July 1989.
2. G. Canfora, A. Cimitile, and M. Munro. An improved algorithm for identifying objects in code. Software Practice and Experience, 26(1):25-48, January 1996.
3. A. Consortium. http://www.dit.upm.es/ares, http://www.infosys.tuwien.ac.at/projects/ares. 1996.
4. T. Fruchterman and E. Reingold. Graph drawing by forcedirected placement. Software, Practice and Experience, 21(11):1129-11164, 1991.
5. D. Harris, A. Yeh, and H. Reubenstein. Extracting architectural features from source code. Automated Software Engineering, (3), 1996.
6. A. Mayrhauser and A. Vans. Identification of dynamic comprehension processes during large scale maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(6), June 1996.
7. N. Mendoca and J. Kramer. Requirements for an effective architecture recovery framework. Proceedings of the SIGSOFT96 Workshops: 2nd Int. Software Architecture Workshop and Int.WorkshoponMultiple Perspectives in Software Development, ACM, 1996.
8. H. Muller, M. Orgun, S. Tilley, and J. Uhl. A reverse engineering approachto subsystemstructure identification. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 5(4), December 1993.
9. G. Murphy and D. Notkin. Reeengineering with reflexion models: A case study. IEEE Computer, 30(8), August 1997.
10. I.-C. T. C. on Software Engineering (TCSE)-Committee on Reverse Engineering. Taxonomy project. http://www.tcse.org/reveng/taxonomy.html, 1997.
11. M. Shaw andD. Garlan. Software Architecture.Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall, 1996.
12. K. Sugiyama, S. Tagawa, and M. Toda. Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical systemstructures. IEEE Trans. on Systems,Man and Cybernetics, 11(2):109-125, 1981.