New predictive tools to estimate diesel oil density and viscosity

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Volumn 98-99, Issue , 2012, Pages 19-21

  Ghaderi, Abdolvahed ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Correlation; Density; Diesel oil; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE ABSOLUTE ERROR; DIESEL OIL; MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OIL-BASED MUD; PREDICTIVE TOOLS; VITAL PARAMETERS;

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); DIESEL FUELS; OPTICAL CORRELATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

VISCOSITY;

AIR TEMPERATURE; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CORRELATION; DENSITY; DIESEL; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84867237454     PISSN: 09204105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ayeni, K., Osisanya, S.O., 2004. Evaluation of Commonly Used Fluid Rheological Models Using Developed Drilling Hydraulic Simulator. Petroleum Society's 5th Canadian International Petroleum Conference (55th Annual Technical Meeting) Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
2. Bourgoyne A.T., Chenevert M.E., Millheim K.K., Young F.S. Applied Drilling Engineering 1991, SPE, Richardson, Texas, USA.
3. Brady D.L., Barnes J.V. Oil mud speeds drilling rate in four Texas fields. Pet. Eng. Int. 1978, 44-53.
4. Caenn R., Chillingar G.V. Drilling fluids: state of the art. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 1996, 14(3-4):221-230.
5. Demirdal B., Cunha J.C. Olefin-based synthetic-drilling-fluids volumetric behavior under downhole conditions. SPE Drill. Completion 2009, 24(2):239-248.
6. Dzida M., Prusakiewicz P. The effect of temperature and pressure on the physicochemical properties of petroleum diesel oil and biodiesel fuel. Fuel 2008, 87(10-11):1941-1948.
7. Galate J.W., Mitchell R.F. Behavior of oil muds during drilling operations. SPE Drill. Eng. 1986, 1(2):97-106.
8. Golis, S.W., 1984. Oil Mud Techniques Improve Performance in Deep, Hostile-Environment Wells. Paper SPE 13156 Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas, USA.
9. Heidaryan E., Moghadasi J., Rahimi M. New correlations to predict natural gas viscosity and compressibility factor. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2010, 73(1):67-72.
10. Hoberock L.L., Thomas D.E., Nickens H.V. Here's how compressibility and temperature affect bottom-hole mud pressure. Oil Gas J. 1982, 80(3):159-164.
11. Jarrahian A., Heidaryan E. A novel correlation approach to estimate thermal conductivity of pure carbon dioxide in the supercritical region. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 64:39-45.
12. Lummus J., Azar J.J. Drilling Fluids Optimization 1986, Penn Well Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
13. Maglione R., Robotti G., Romagnoli R. In-situ rheological characterization of drilling mud. SPE J. 2000, 5(4):377-386.
14. Nance W.B. How to select oil mud applications. Pet. Eng. Int. 1984, 56(1):30-38.
15. Peters E.J., Chenevert M.E., Zhang C. A model for predicting the density of oil-based muds at high pressures and temperatures. SPE Drill. Eng. 1990, 5(2):141-148.
16. Politte, M.D., 1985. Invert Oil Mud Rheology as a Function of Temperature and Pressure. Paper SPE/IADC 13458. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
17. Sorelle, R.R., Jardiolin, R.A., Buckley, P., Barrios, J.R., 1982. Mathematical Field Model Predicts Downhole Density Changes in Static Drilling Fluids. SPE Paper 11118. 57th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.