The perils of the least publishable unit

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 601-602

  Dupps, William J ^a   Randleman, J Bradley ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT ANALYSIS; COST; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REFRACTIVE SURGERY;

EID: 84867203049     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120815-05     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Broad WJ. The publishing game: getting more for less. Science. 1981;211(4487):1137-1139.
2. Rohrich RJ, Sullivan D. Plagiarism and dual publication: review of the issues and policy statement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(4):1333-1339.
3. Anderson MP. Plagiarism, copyright violation, and dual publication: are you guilty? Ground Water. 2006;44:623. Available at: http://www.ngwa.org/ Documents/Publications/gw-plagiarism. pdf. Accessed August 14, 2012.
4. Williamson RC, Farndon JR, Murie JA, Johnson CD, Earnshaw JJ. Dual publication (almost). Br J Surg. 1995;82(5):581.
5. Williamson RC, Farndon JR, Murie JA, Johnson CD. Dual publication - again [editors announcements]. Br J Surg. 1992;79(7):601.
6. Hanke CW, Arndt KA, Dobson RL, Dzubow LM, Parish LC, Taylor JS. Dual publication and manipulation of the editorial process. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990;12(6):542-543.
7. Avoidance of dual publication. Statement by the Council of Biology Editors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115(1):13.