Patient understanding of the revised USPSTF screening mammogram guidelines: need for development of patient decision aids

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Allen, Summer V ^a   Solberg Nes, Lise ^b   Marnach, Mary L ^a   Polga, Kristen ^c   Jenkins, Sarah M ^a   Files, Julia A ^d   Croghan, Ivana T ^a   Ghosh, Karthik ^a   Pruthi, Sandhya ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MARSHFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Confusion; Guidelines; Health status; Screening mammogram; USPSTF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867198131     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-36     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225-249. 10.3322/caac.20006, 19474385.
2. Miller B, Kolonel L, Bernstein L, Young J, Swanson G, West D, Key C, Liff J, Glover C, Alexander G, et al. Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the united states, 1988-1992, Top five cancers. NIH Pub. No. 96-4104 1996, Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, http://seer.cancer.gov/publications/ethnicity/index.html, 3111874, 21493873.
3. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JD, Feuer EJ. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:1784-1792. 10.1056/NEJMoa050518, 16251534.
4. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2002, 137:347-360.
5. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer 2009, http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
6. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:727-737. W237-742, 2972726, 19920273.
7. US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:716-726. US Preventive Services Task Force.
8. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, Berry DA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, Huang H, Lee SJ, Munsell M, Plevritis SK, Ravdin P, Schechter CB, Sigal B, Stoto MA, Stout NK, van Ravesteyn NT, Venier J, Zelen M, Feuer EJ. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:738-747.
9. Woolf SH. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US preventive services task force. JAMA 2010, 303:162-163. 10.1001/jama.2009.1989, 20068210.
10. Peres J. Mammography screening: after the storm, calls for more personalized approaches. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:9-11. 10.1093/jnci/djp496, 20023204.
11. Petitti DB, Calonge N. Media coverage of U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: a commentary. Am J Prev Med 2011, 40:579-580. 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.009, 21496760.
12. Holliman K. Calmer talk needed about mammography 2010, http://www.acpinternist.org/archives/2010/02/breast.htm.
13. American Academy of Family Physicians Updated AAFP breast cancer screening recommendations stress communication 2010, http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/clinical-care-research/20100115aafp-brca-recs.html, American Academy of Family Physicians.
14. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the united states, 2010: a review of current american cancer society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2010, 60:99-119. 10.3322/caac.20063, 20228384.
15. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D, Brenner RJ, Bassett L, Berg W, Feig S, Hendrick E, Mendelson E, D'Orsi C, Sickles E, Burhenne LW. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the society of breast imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7:18-27. 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022, 20129267.
16. American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists Practice bulletin no. 122: breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 2011, 118:372-382. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822c98e5, 21775869, American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists.
17. Berg WA. Benefits of screening mammography. JAMA 2010, 303:168-169. 10.1001/jama.2009.1993, 20068213.
18. Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United states preventive services task force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196:W112-116. 10.2214/AJR.10.5609, 21257850.
19. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. JAMA 2010, 303:164-165. 10.1001/jama.2009.2007, 20068211.
20. Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive services task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prev Med 2011, 40:497-504. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027, 21496748.
21. SAS Institute Inc SAS®/STAT User's guide 2005, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, Version 9, SAS Institute Inc.
22. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006, 333:417. 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE, 1553508, 16908462.
23. Australian screening mammography decision Aid trial http://www.mammogram.med.usyd.edu.au/.
24. Public Health Agency of Canada Information on mammography for women aged 40 and older: a decision Aid for breast cancer screening in canada 2009, Chronic Disease Management Divison, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/mammography-mammographie-eng.php, Public Health Agency of Canada.
25. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ 2002, 324:827-830. 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827, 1122766, 11934777.
26. Neuman HB, Charlson ME, Temple LK. Is there a role for decision aids in cancer-related decisions?. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007, 62:240-250. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.12.006, 17317206.
27. Brawley O, Byers T, Chen A, Pignone M, Ransohoff D, Schenk M, Smith R, Sox H, Thorson AG, Wender R. New american cancer society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines. JAMA 2011, 306:2495-2499. 10.1001/jama.2011.1800, 22166609.