The landmark selection method for multiple output prediction

Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2012

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 983-990

  Balasubramanian, Krishnakumar ^a   Lebanon, Guy ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL PROBLEMS; CONDITIONAL MODELS; DATA SETS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; LANDMARK SELECTION; LOW DIMENSIONAL; MULTI-LABEL; MULTIPLE OUTPUTS; MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION; PREDICTION METHODS; RESEARCH EFFORTS; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84867137594     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bi, W. and Kwok, J. Multi-label classification on tree and dag structured hierarchies. ICML, 2011.
2. Breiman, L. and Friedman, J. H. Predicting multivariate responses in multiple linear regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:B, 59, 1997.
3. Cesa-Bianchi, N., Gentile, C., and Zaniboni, L. Incremental algorithms for hierarchical classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006.
4. Hsu, D., Kakade, S. M., Langford, J., and Zhang, T. Multi-label prediction via compressed sensing. NIPS, 2009.
5. Izenman, A.J. Reduced-rank regression for the multivariate linear model. Journal of multivariate analysis, 5, 1975.
6. Liu, H., Lafferty, J., and Wasserman, L. Nonparametric regression and classification with joint sparsity constraints. NIPS, 2008.
7. Obozinski, G., Wainwright, M. J., and Jordan, M. I. support union recovery in high-dimensional multivariate regression. Annals of statistics, 39, 2011.
8. Reinsel, G. C. and Velu, R. P. Multivariate reduced- rank regression: theory and applications. Springer New York, 1998.
9. Rifkin, R. and Klautau, A. In defense of one-vs-all classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:101-141, 2004.
10. Rohde, A. and Tsybakov, A. B. Estimation of high-dimensional low-rank matrices. The Annals of Statistics, 39, 2011.
11. Sprechmann, P., Ramírez, I., Sapiro, G., and Eldar, Y. C. C-hilasso: A collaborative hierarchical sparse modeling framework. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 59, 2011.
12. Tai, F. and Lin, H. T. Multi-label classification with principle label space transformation. Neural Computation, 2012.
13. Tsochantaridis, I., Joachims, T., Hofmann, T., and Altun, Y. Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006.
14. Tsoumakas, G., I., I. Katakis, and Vlahavas. Mining multi-label data. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, pp. 667-685, 2010.
15. Vens, C., Struyf, J., Schietgat, L., Ďzeroski, S., and Blockeel, H. Decision trees for hierarchical multi-label classification. Machine Learning, 2008.
16. Wright, S. J., Nowak, R. D., and Figueiredo, M. A. T. Sparse reconstruction by separable approximation. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 57, 2009.
17. Yang, J., Yu, K., Gong, Y., and Huang, T. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.
18. Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 68, 2006.
19. Zhao, P. and Yu, B. On model selection consistency of lasso. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006.
20. Zou, H., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. Sparse principal component analysis. Journal of computational and graphical statistics, 2006.