Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: Crayons are the Future

TechTrends

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 13-16

  Mishra, Punya ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867133521     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-012-0594-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abrahamson, D. (2004). Embodied spatial articulation: A gesture perspective on student negotiation between kinesthetic schemas and epistemic forms in learning mathematics. In D. E. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 791 - 797). Toronto, Ontario: Preney.
2. Abrahamson, D. (2006). The Three M's: Imagination, Embodiment, and Mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, June, 2006, Baltimore, MD.
3. Alibali, M., Mitchel, N. (2011) Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence from Learners' and Teachers' Gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1-40.
4. Bahls, P. (2009). Math and metaphor: Using poetry to teach college mathematics. The WAC Journal 20.
5. Caper, R. (1996). Play, Experimentation And Creativity. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis. 77, 859-869.
6. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Perseus Book Group.
7. Frank, K., Zhao, Y., & Boreman, K. (2004). Social Capital and the Implementation of Computers in Schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148-171.
8. Fuson, K. C., & Abrahamson, D. (2005). Understanding ratio and proportion as an example of the Apprehending Zone and Conceptual-Phase problem-solving models. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 213-234). New York: Psychology Press.
9. Gulbahar, Y (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4). 943-956.
10. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17(6), 560-565.
11. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being: Basic Books.
12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
13. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March 24-28. (Conference Presentation).
14. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the tpack framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11(2), 22-28.
15. Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
16. Robinson, K. (2003). Mind the gap: The creative conundrum. Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 41-45.
17. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In: A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49-82). Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. Root-Bernstein, R. S, & Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world's most creative people. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, D. K. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structure domains. Educational Technology, 31 (5), 24-33.
21. Ureta, N. (2012). Kinecting With Students: UW Bothell students and faculty get creative with math education. The Daily of the University of Washington. (January 5th, 2012) Retrieved from: http://dailyuw. com/news/2012/jan/04/kinectingstudents/.
22. Yardi, S. and boyd, d. (2010). "Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter." Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30(5), 316-327.
23. Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway?: Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 171-202.